<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: ASUS P8P67 WS Revolution Motherboard Review</title>
<link>http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/</link>
<description>DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: ASUS P8P67 WS Revolution Motherboard Review</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 04:21:49 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>skaidyhbl on "ASUS P8P67 WS Revolution Motherboard Review"</title>
<link>http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/topic.php?id=135769&#038;page#post-156987</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Oct 2013 23:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>skaidyhbl</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">156987@http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;ASUS P8P67 WS Revolution Mother board Assessment,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cefir.fr/Cheminsdetraverse/&quot;&gt;Louboutin&lt;/a&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Your on the deck of audio tracks MICIN vent had been analyzed utilizing a Logitech World wide web Chat Bluetooth headset. Spoken words had been registered through the Glass windows Sound Camera located beneath the Accessories\Entertainment directory inside the begin food selection inside Windows 7. The playback quality is made using the Mic Boost alternative disabled, and then enabled. The particular Microphone Enhance options within your superior menu within the microphone stand part within the degree Manage Menus.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The playback quality test was really pretty clear with the microphone stand improve selection empowered and also disabled. Although it had been audible for both, it absolutely was more clear and a lot more noticable using the optioned enabled.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To check the features in the fully briefed Universal series bus Two.Zero internet connections, we employed the ACOMDATA HD060U2FE72USB Two.0/FireWire Hard drive connected initial for the Universal series bus interface. SATA generate exams ended up done employing Developed Digital camera Caviar Dark WD1002FAEX hard drives upon almost all SATA headers. Your SATA hard disks were utilised for tests in RAID Zero 16k prevent dimensions adjustments upon just about all suitable controllers. Testing was also carried out utilizing the same model SATA hard disks in a stand-alone SATA setting in almost all suitable remote controls. Just about all travel criteria ended up carried out while using readily accessible CrystalDiskMark Three or more.0 software, manage using the two 50MB along with 100MB sized check sets.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Typically you think that the actual Marvell 9128 operator would certainly dominate. Maybe it will in a celery to be able to oatmeal assessment however since anyone put on possess the precise control of the actual red stripe dimension carry out with all the Apple remote controls, the particular Apple company operator dominates during SATA 3 grams method. In SATA 6G setting the actual Marvell control looks instead pathetic. This might be as a result of go delinquent red stripe dimensions being diverse from that relating to the actual Apple controlled nevertheless usually many of us come to realize that the particular nonnative built-in options simply aren on par with the actual chipset centered controllers. (Editor's Take note: It's my realizing that there's a BIOS correct ahead that can tackle this kind of Marvel circumstance.)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Generally speaking the same developments we got in the 50MB check keep on. The gap here is which throughout successive reads the particular Marvell 9128 truly displaces your Apple P67 operator even during SATA 6G mode. No doubt due to the bigger red stripe dimensions the idea defaults for you to inside RAID function. (Most likely a new Sixty-four or 128K stripe as opposed to 16KB) What additionally interesting though is the fact that within RAID0, your Marvell 9128 overall performance declines being a good ole'. That gets considerably a whole lot worse efficiency throughout RAID function compared to stand alone function. Within the publish assessments the P67 once again trounces the particular Marvell 9128 control inside stand alone and in RAID modes. Along with RAID modes acquiring almost 50% running within step by step is currently writing. (Editor's Be aware: It is indeed my understanding that there's a BIOS repair in the future that will deal with this specific Miracle predicament.)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;You might have noticed your USB and Firewire performance,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cefir.fr/Cheminsdetraverse/&quot;&gt;Louboutin femme&lt;/a&gt;. The latter can be worse than I observed on various other panels. The actual VIA operator only doesn complement TI centered remotes. Nonetheless Hardware efficiency is way better in contrast to repeat the MSI P67AGD65,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cefir.fr/Cheminsdetraverse/&quot;&gt;Louboutin soldes&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Hagel Technologies DU Gauge computer software was adopted together with Glass windows Process Boss to ascertain the functionality amounts of the on-ship system user interface. DU Multi meter was used to measure bandwith as well as shift rates, while House windows Task Manager checked Computer consumption on the analyze system. For your screening, the 750MB Repository document composed of many condensed WMA/MP3 documents was utilized for the huge report move, and 750MB valuation on MP3/WMA records were utilised ranging throughout styles from three in order to 30MB was adopted for your small records transfer test. The exam has been done utilizing a plenum ranked group 5e crossover wire to be able to bypass any traffic, routing or other move concerns and also probable package reduction or even data corruption that could be the result of a router/switch or centre. Your cabling were attached in between a pair of test machines, 1 using the on board NIC(utes) from the aboard being evaluated and the other can be an Apple company EXPI9400PT 10/100/1000Mbps PCIExpress Gigabit Ethernet card set up right into a test machine using an Apple company D5400XS mother board.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;ASUS has really appreciated Apple network game controllers and PHY as of late,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cefir.fr/Cheminsdetraverse/‎&quot;&gt;Louboutin Pas Cher&lt;/a&gt;. That of course good news because the Realtek and Marvell game controllers have been or even often subpar. LAN One particular is surely an Apple 82547L PHY gigabit controlled competent at 10/100/1000 data transfer rates. Additionally it is competent at adaptor teaming together with LAN 2. LAN Two is surely an Apple company 82579V that has been incorporated into the particular system board.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The big data files down load analyze created virtually identical results. The common transfer fee had been Sixty.1MB/s having a maximum of Sixty six,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cefir.fr/Cheminsdetraverse/&quot;&gt;http://www.cefir.fr/Cheminsdetraverse&lt;/a&gt;.3MB/s. CPU consumption emerged a bit when compared to last check from 5%. The larger data files distribute check demonstrated great amounts. The typical shift charge reach Ninety one.2MB an additional with a peak of 119MB/s. CPU usage would be a simple 3% with this check. In general the execution is a little throughout the road here,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.speakeasy.jp/sebbs/index.cgi&quot;&gt;http://www.speakeasy.jp/sebbs/index.cgi&lt;/a&gt;. This is among the most severe carrying out of all the Intel NICs My partner and i seen. Performance only agreed to be not to consistent which in turn unexpected situations us.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Your Apple 82579v adapter do far better with an typical shift fee associated with 87.8MB/s and also maxing out and about at 115MB/s from the small files obtain analyze. Central processing unit usage had been more than I expected however because of the strong performance, My spouse and i forgive that. CPU usage was simply 5%, however witnessed less about this board in additional assessments. Not really that 5% is actually silly. As we saw inside the modest records distribute check on the other half adapter, average overall performance ended up being under outstanding hitting a delicate Fifty-two.7MB/s along with peaking in 114MB/s. Processor consumption fell once more in order to 3%.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The large document obtain examination demonstrated the best final results but. Striking Ninety-seven,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.61l.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=2313868&quot;&gt;http://www.61l.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=2313868&lt;/a&gt;.5MB/s and maxing away with 119MB/s. Many of us would cash in terms of Processor consumption achievable number growing to be able to 7%. On the big files add check we got almost identical results as compared to the acquire examination. Ninety-seven.6MB/s for your regular along with 118MB/s for the highest throughput,&lt;a href=&quot;http://bbs.feipinbox.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=1027065&quot;&gt;http://bbs.feipinbox.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=1027065&lt;/a&gt;. CPU utilization had been a little much better though hitting merely 5%. Apart from the anomaly in the tiny files distribute analyze this adapter was greater around simply by progress when compared to the 82547L control.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Off of the baseball bat many of us several interesting outcomes. The particular P8P67 WS Wave really does much better from Three.4GHz in comparison with Some.4GHz on this examination. Strangely enough, we had exactly the same thing about the MSI P67AGD65. There's probably a new latency or even moment matter at work which in turn causes the particular stop by memory data transfer useage overall performance. My spouse and i noticed similar final results once in a while working Sandra on my analyze table. And surely there has been Massive double channel bandwith numbers that rival that relating to the actual triple channel 980X cpu. Apple has done their preparation with this particular latest storage operator.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;This specific benchmark is extremely seriously threaded, achieving into just about all accessible strings and that means you would think that your 980X would certainly reign better. And also you can be appropriate. In spite of the particular P67 panels overclocked to Several.4GHz, they may be still long ago within the group.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
