n8bS6lA5Sa on "the case eventually found how to deal with"

n8bS6lA5Sa — Wed, 28 Oct 2015 04:08:49 +0000

"If this case so I draw a conclusion, and the future of marriage who also protected?" Marital relations is done because of that, a rich list Hurun Rich List's wife Ms. Song to the Haidian court her husband for divorce. Husband actually took out a piece of paper the decision a decade ago to prove the two divorced early, and Ms. Song claiming this totally unaware. An exclusive interview with this reporter, explore billionaire's wife "is divorce," the mystery. It discovered had filed for divorce, "divorce" Decade Although as a billionaire's wife, but Miss Song this identity in addition to the closest person, few people know, she do not want people to know. In Miss Song opinion, this identity did not give her much enjoyment, but is suffering unspeakable. After 22 years of marriage maintained, Miss Song choose divorce. Last September, Ms. Song divorce in Beijing Haidian court pretrial mediation. As prominent husband did not show up, his attorney asked the jurisdiction objection that the case should be tried in local courts Hebei. Ms. Song did not think so in any case, in addition to jurisdictional objection, the other party has come up with a verdict entered into force in Hengshui City, Hebei Province Intermediate People's Court in 2001 made the decision in court have been shocked to read the divorce judgment, the husband and wife Two real estate in all housing units owned by the woman. That is to say, a decade ago, the couple would have ended the marriage,http://www.foss.lk/comment/profile.php?uid=58, while Ms. Song actually completely unaware of this, but also on the court yet. "I was on the Mongolia, his mind went blank." Miss Song told reporters that she did not dare to believe, divorce such a big thing, how she did not know. Reporters saw in the verdict, Ms. Song's husband, said he outside year round business, busy little home. It is inevitable that misunderstandings between husband and wife, feeling slowed. Miss Song said he, "is divorce" because she did not appear in court, a copy of the indictment and the court summons,piumini moncler sito ufficiale, even the verdict is in form of notice served,http://www.juezhansa.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=6179, from beginning to end, even the shadow of her children do not know. Our Civil Procedural Law stipulates that missing person to be served, or any other manner prescribed by law can not be served before the public notice. After the public notice should be exhausted other mode of service, a way to protect the party's appeal of last resort. Is Miss Song disappeared in 2001? "Unaccounted for" stricken "is divorce" According to Ms. Song's husband to court to say, after he separated from his wife in 1997, three years and a half, even the phone did not contacted his wife during this period "unaccounted for." But the reporter Miss Song's lawyer and obtained a divorce case file and the court did not see the phone records of judicial notice, or send the relevant special mailing sent material was returned. The court found Ms. Song "unaccounted for," the evidence is a visit to the investigation. February 5, 2001, the judge made a special trip to Beijing to cell Miss Song live, to find a staff member of the Property Management Department, according to the staff said, Ms. Song has not lived here more than a year, and find people . Ms. Song afterwards found the property staff to understand the situation, the person said the living conditions of the time did not know Miss Song. February 9, 2001, announcement court complaint and court summons served on the newspapers. Miss Song is almost no opportunity to see the announcement on the newspaper, the respondent did not appear natural. After the announcement expires, the court hearing the same day in a default judgment, and also served on the verdict announcement, after the expiration of the divorce judgment so entered into force. Ms. Song puzzled and said: "My cell phone number since 1997 began to use, has not been replaced, if the fight can not contact my phone does not address the court on my investigation was also my residence, even knocked up. door, I could at home. And I identity card residence address is the residence of her in-laws, I always go back, can also find me. Although I was and her husband separated, but after all,http://demo1.lomotec.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=56, two people with children, but also in regular contact, he said, I have no problem unaccounted for, can the court alone to find a so-called man of property say that I am missing, it can not be justified. " "Flawed" frequent verdict Look this divorce decree, Miss Song is angry. On serious verdict actually had a lot of "flawed." First of all, her name in one word wrong,woolrich outlet italia, her husband's birth date was wrong after one year, the eldest son of the date of birth is wrong. But can not explain that, Miss Song's second son in 2007 the name was changed, and in 2001 the verdict had been using the new name for six years after the. Miss Song is leaving confused, she was divorced in knowledge, this decade husband Why can never start? Even more strange it is that, in the past two years, the two had also discussed matters relating to divorce. Husband is also a lawyer drafted a divorce agreement. In addition, the handle of her husband in 2009, Hebei temporary residence permits, marital status is still "married." Since he would have got the divorce judgment, why so many years, "hidden", even after the divorce and Ms. Song also discuss divorce? Although it has too many problems, but not to question Miss Song husband. "My heart is all broken." Ms. Song said she would rather go bankrupt, we should also fight the lawsuit in the end, to have a say of their own identity this decade. "I want to fight for the rights of children,http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595." Since Ms. Song also wanted a divorce, and then the judgment also found divorce. From the results point of view is no different,moncler outlet italia, Miss Song why not accept it? "There should not divorce from my comments, I can not accept the situation in the knowledge of being divorced." Ms. Song said, the more important point is that in the 2001 judgment, the husband's duties also I wrote a pipe plant manager, but after all these years, his assets have been I do not know how many times the surge. If the two had been divorced 10 years ago, that her husband's assets this decade on the whole of their personal property; if overturned this verdict, then these assets should be jointly owned property. Once split up, this would be the highest amount of domestic assets subject divorce. Such astronomical property, Miss Song is impossible not to be tempted. But she told reporters that her own power could live well, that wealth must give two of her sons fight. Ms. Song and her husband are from Beijing, the original work in a factory, in 1988 to get married. Two free love, very happy married life,http://bbs.0736tc.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=13529, has given birth to two boys. Husband is very business-minded, with his wife venture into the sea, from scratch, run from the pipe plant. For children, Ms. Song to go home to start a full-time wife. Miss Song said, when expecting her second child, the two sides to produce intense conflict, separated life. "I gave birth to second son, six months later,http://www.hayasoft.com/snooze/cgi-bin/guest/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=245/, the hands of money, they had to go out to work, he took the opportunity to send their children taken away." Ms. Song comes to child sadly lap dog eat dog. Miss Song said, in this decade, she worked hard teeth entrepreneurship, and finally a small achievement, the company also has a good income each year. "My two children are married to our normal birth, if I do not seek solutions in the future they will certainly be in trouble." Ms. Song said that if she can win a couple of their own part of the common property division, will leave all two children. The woman's desire to divorce is invalid In order to fight the lawsuit, Ms. Song Longan Law Firm Beijing attracted find the main Renchen Xu counsel. While Chen Xu counsel many complex problems of family property disputes,http://www.pennbranchdc.org/communityforum/discussion/2780733/a-campus-student-seriously-injured, but this "is divorce," the verdict is still surprised him. Chen Xu lawyer told reporters, first of all, the right to court accepted the case should be defendant Miss Song seat of the Court, in the year her husband did not provide any evidence that Ms. Song unaccounted for, the Hebei Hengshui Intermediate People's Court has no jurisdiction. Second, as the exercise of the litigation rights of the parties to ensure that the basic procedures, the law strictly defines the method of service of the court. Hengshui Intermediate People's Court after the case, there is no law to take direct delivery, mail service, lien served, commissioned service, etc., but in the third day after the announcement of the decision to initiate service copy of the indictment and the court summons, He violated the rights of Ms. Song's lawsuit is a serious offense. Moreover, only a survey record is not proof of identity retained investigators could not prove the authenticity of this investigation. This was the testimony of the person under investigation is very low effectiveness, the court has decided to serve in this way, hasty action. Mr. Chen said that in addition to violation of procedure outside there are many wrong decisions. For such a party concerning personal rights and property rights and interests of major cases, the court failed to adequately examine the identity of the litigants, and even party identity cards, marriage certificates and other basic identity information is not retained in the case file. These problems led to the trial judge should be invalid. The puzzle is that after Miss Song filed for divorce, which is the Hengshui Intermediate People's Court after the divorce judgment after 10 years, her husband ED Hebei Hengshui Intermediate People's Court for rectification of errors in judgment, and the trial verdict did not put forward a reasonable punishment couple common property. Thereafter, the Hengshui Intermediate People's Court retrial procedures initiated ex officio. Recently,doudoune moncler soldes, the Haidian court ruling has also served on the Miss Song and lawyers: Hebei Hengshui Intermediate People's Court in view of the divorce judgment, can no longer accept Ms. Song Haidian court proceedings. Today, the case eventually found how to deal with, we should look Hengshui Intermediate People's Court for retrial can change the year has been the fact that the judgment of divorce. In order to verify the proper settlement of the legal basis for argumentation of the case, Chen Xu lawyer invited more than domestic procedural law experts and scholars argues that experts issued Opinion that, as a change in the relationship between the subject of proceedings identity divorce proceedings, Hengshui Intermediate People's Court trial procedures jurisdictional error exists, depriving the rights of the parties debate, without lawful subpoena default judgment and other serious violations, the decision was undoubtedly made invalid. Experts believe that the correct verdict wrong, retrial procedure should cassation, the court rejected the man prosecuted. Chen Xu, the lawyer said: "Although this is only a special case together,woolrich outlet milano, but it contains an extremely dangerous signal: If the existing marriage relationship may be by any of the lifting of such proceedings, the stability that marriage and the family, social relations certainty would be seriously damaged. correct errors in handling the case, is not only a fair to Miss Song, but is also an account of the public interest. " Reporters at March 24 dedicated to the Hengshui Intermediate People's Court sent a letter to want to interview Miss Song verification issues reflect, but immediately after the court received a fax reply, told reporters that all interview Hebei Provincial High Court shall be subject to the approval of the job. Reporter then call the Hebei Provincial High Court Political Department propaganda department, the staff said,http://www.foss.lk/comment/profile.php?uid=1, "should not have this provision." Finally, the High Court received a reporter's interview letter, conveyed to the Hengshui Intermediate People's Court. However, ten days later, the reporter has not received any reply. In addition, reporters from the two telephone contact Ms. Song provides case man party, make their comments. One number is not turned on, another subsidiary of the company Miss Song husband answered the phone, his co-workers dedicated to understand the contents of the reporters needed to verify, but said it could not reply on his behalf, will be conveyed. As of press time reporter, has not been a substantive reply. Our reporter Sun Ying (Edit: SN026)

DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: the case eventually found how to deal with

n8bS6lA5Sa on "the case eventually found how to deal with"