fh7pD1GH6 on "NVG30tMC9D"

fh7pD1GH6 — Tue, 10 Nov 2015 14:14:32 +0000

Guangzhou Huangpu District Environmental Protection Bureau, said the National Day holiday due cause overdue, the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court said the case "unjustified overdue" Last year, the Guangzhou Huangpu District Environmental Protection Bureau for a business owner to make oil out of a 100,000 yuan in fines, the boss will Huangpu District Environmental Protection Agency reported to the court. Unexpectedly, the council was overdue proof, because the National Day holiday. The court held that leave is not justified, but the council did not apply for an extension in advance, should be regarded as relevant evidence does not provide a fine, it has recently declared it lost. ■ Express reporter intern Guo Haiyan Chen Meng Since the National Day holiday, an extension to submit evidence According to the Court of First Instance to identify, Chow rented mountain bluegrass field next to the Huangpu District,http://www.haircare-style.jp, gas station a long fork,http://www.nj-bridge.com/ad/Review.asp?NewsID=486, the means for storing business use. August 19, 2014,http://www.moviequote.net/moviequote.cgi, Huangpu District of Guangzhou City Environmental Protection Bureau to Chow out of a "administrative penalty decision" because Chow Set used oil collection point at this location for storage, sales from refinery collected from oil. EPA region that these waste oil collection, storage, sales and other items,doudoune moncler femme, are not implemented environmental impact assessment system, and not build in environmental protection facilities into production without environmental acceptance of the case, in violation of the State Council, "Construction Project Environmental Protection Management Regulations. " EPA regulations issued on the basis of the area above penalties,moncler Outlet, to Chow oil business in date of receipt of this decision from the collection point to stop related, and fined 100,000 yuan. Chow is very satisfied with this punishment. September 15,http://0to1.info, 2014, he filed an administrative lawsuit to the Huangpu court, requesting the court to revoke the EPA region "administrative penalty decision" and assume the case acceptance fee. Huangpu court in the same year on September 24 to the EPA lawsuit served on the relevant material. The court held that, under the provisions of the EPA for specific administrative acts of the burden of proof shall be on the date of receipt of the copy of the complaint submitted to the specific administrative act of the relevant materials to the people's court within ten days. But the EPA until October 9, 2014, before submitting evidence and legal basis for administrative penalties to the Huangpu court. Subsequently, the council has issued submit "a report on the case because the incident delayed submit proof material,http://hisamatsu-online.org," says for "National Day" holiday and is not due to my legal representative units and other reasons, resulting in overdue proof. No application for extension shall be deemed overdue process Because overdue,louboutin soldes pas cher, lost the first trial of the EPA. Huangpu court held that, in accordance with regulations, the EPA does not provide or unjustified late evidence deemed specific administrative act is no corresponding evidence. If the EPA due to force majeure or objective can not control other legitimate reasons, can not provide evidence on schedule, it should be in receipt of the copy of the complaint to the People's Court to apply for an extension in writing within ten days of evidence. According to the investigation, Huangpu District Environmental Protection Bureau received a copy of the complaint on September 24, 2014,woolrich outlet italia, October 9, 2014 was submitted to the relevant evidence and legal basis. The court held that it fails to provide evidence; the reason given does not belong to the objective force majeure or other legitimate reasons can not control. Accordingly,http://www.beautylife8.com, the court depending on the Huangpu District Environmental Protection Bureau of the specific administrative act is no corresponding evidence. Chow's judgment should revoke the administrative penalty decision. After the sentence, Huangpu District Environmental Protection Bureau appealed to Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court, said the council as early as June last year,http://www.femme-nail.jp, will be "ordered to stop environmental violations notice" served to Chow, then was issued a "notice of administrative penalty hearing this book . " Chow offense of "record of inquiry", "on-site inspection record" and the scene photos give proof, its extension is proof indeed accidental. But Chow said before the penalty decision, did not fulfill obligations under the law,louboutin pas cher, no service "Hearing this book" to the appellant. Second instance court case in Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court, the hospital found evidence the council indeed overdue, but did not provide evidence for an extension of a written application, are "unjustified overdue." Yesterday, reporters learned that the case Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court has made a decision in May this year,http://www.dvd.net.au/search.cgi, giving upheld. & Nbsp; Edit: SN146

DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: NVG30tMC9D

fh7pD1GH6 on "NVG30tMC9D"