nksai07821 on "the other lied to the Bank of China"

nksai07821 — Sat, 14 Nov 2015 01:32:12 +0000

(Reporter Pei Xiaolan) Trustee Lee surrendered to buy public maternity passbook and password, and the result was a liar with a fake ID taken away more than 130 million yuan, which she sued China Construction Bank Beijing Branch Anwar damages. Reporters learned yesterday, the court found the bank negligent in reviewing Lee valid identity link, sentenced Lee 234,000 yuan compensation. Lee alleged that, in 2005,air max 90 pas cher, she was introduced to the woman Dan,air max 90 pas cher, the other lied to the Bank of China, China Orient Asset Management Corporation staff in a manner capable of "rent-sale" to buy units of public delivery room,woolrich outlet milano, she therefore commissioned Dan purchase. August 26, 2006,http://www.anne-dufetel.eu/spip.php?article211, Li Dan, said the timing of the purchase has been to allow Lee to buy a house there are 1.384 million yuan of book showed her aim is to make people look at the property,http://www.88822.com/#03666/read.php?tid=980, Lee will surrender passbook. October 17 the same year, Lee found within passbook deposits have been 18 times the basic points to take light, after the public security organs identified as Dan should do. Lee believes that Dan and without her ID card, bank lending entirely review obligations,http://www.ito.dz/spip.php?article74, should pay her damages. When the hearing, the bank said, holding passbook savings customers, a one-time withdrawal only 50,000 yuan passbook and password, 50,000 yuan more than required principal and agent ID card. When Dan withdrawals, there are a total of 3 780 000 pen teller 50,000 yuan more than a one-time, Dan and Lee then offered her identity. Banks also believe that to Dan Lee provides password and ID, should themselves bear responsibility. In this regard, Lee denied. So the Court were verified to Dan, she said, she made withdrawals Ms. Lee fake ID, but can not remember how to get the password. After hearings, the Chaoyang court verdict bank teller bears fault for 780,000 yuan, according to 30% of the responsibility, the need to compensate 234,http://www.dashangwuyu.com/news/html/?40740.html,000 yuan Lee. After the verdict, Ms. Lee and banks respectively appeal. During the second trial, the court for the transfer of Lee interrogation transcripts made in Dan fraud cases in which, Lee admitted that he told the passbook and password Dan. Second Intermediate Court that,http://www.radio-gresivaudan.org/spip.php?article49, under the provisions of the People's Bank, cash only 50,woolrich outlet,000 yuan passbook and password, Lee did not keep the passbook and password,http://www.democratie-socialisme.org/spip.php?article3525, remove the 5 million or less money on the bank there is no fault. 50,000 yuan to 780,http://bbs.tt919.com/read.php?tid-262522-fpage-80.html/read.php?tid-262522-fpage-80.html/post.php?fid=381?fid=381,000 yuan or more, according to the provisions teller withdrawals must be requested to provide valid identity documents,http://www.marandy.be/spip.php?article240, but the bank did not submit evidence of Dan Lee had valid ID,moncler pas cher, and there fault. The court held that Lee password and passbook custody obligation greater than the obligation of the bank to examine identity documents, to deal with the loss of 780,000 yuan deposits bear primary responsibility. Bank of negligence on the part of the review valid identity card, bear secondary responsibility. First instance verdict should be maintained.

DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: the other lied to the Bank of China

nksai07821 on "the other lied to the Bank of China"