urkma8w9u0i on "air max 90 "

urkma8w9u0i — Sat, 14 Nov 2015 19:41:08 +0000

Evening News reporter intern Zhang Xue Qian Zhu Yun reports Complain because "something less, and unpalatable,chaussure new balance, what is the use of light to change tableware", two flight attendants Virgin Atlantic's dismissal on the microblogging. To this end,louboutin promo, two flight attendants will Shanghai FASCO human resources branch,woolrich bologna, the British Virgin Atlantic Airways Shanghai office to court. In June, the Court of First Instance dismissed the entire petition Changning two flight attendants and two flight attendants appeal. Yesterday, the case of a second trial in Shanghai Intermediate People's Court, the two sides around the boundaries of "free speech" and "duty of loyalty" of heated discussions again. Trial focus Dismissal legality First instance verdict, the Court affirms the flight attendants as employees failed to fulfill a duty of loyalty to the airline's failure to comply with the provisions of the company's system, so the company to terminate the labor contract with the flight attendants compliance with the law, the court shall be supported. As appellant, two flight attendants took part in the trial yesterday. The trial,ceinture versace, the focus of controversy between the two sides are: Virgin Atlantic Airways flight attendants on both the legality of the lifting of labor relations; during the dispute, the company investigation, the fact that the flight attendants if there is overtime; whether flight attendants can enjoy the benefits of annual leave and free of charge. Among them, the first point is the crux of the dispute. The lawyer stressed that two flight attendants and two flight attendants are used in the private time private microblogging accounts, published real speech, and did not disclose their identity Virgin employees,maillot basket, which is totally citizens "freedom of speech",cappelli nhl, nor violate the Articles of Association . In addition, two of the comments did not cause any real impact, it is fired after Virgin stewardess and attracted media coverage, only netizens strong concern and dissatisfaction. Virgin Atlantic's attorney countered that the Virgin's clear regulations,basket nike pas cher, an employee shall not be published on the company's negative remarks in public social platform, the provision does not distinguish between work or after work, he did not distinguish whether revealing identity. That is, as long as the employee made his unfavorable remarks, the company can be processed,louboutin france, as is fine, conditioning or direct job dismissal, the degree of severity of the punishment process is decided. The trial also dismissal procedures and debate on issues such as annual leave, the court is not in court for sentencing. &#160,basket jordan homme; Outside the courtroom Virgin was the official micro netizens scraper This morning, reporters in the Virgin Atlantic Airways official microblogging see, "Virgin Atlantic Airways has announced plans to spend one hundred million pounds over three years to enhance the luxury business class products,asics gel prix," is still on the microblogging page, but in this case the two flight attendants , that is,lacoste lunette de soleil, the microblogging comment, use the "little things, but unpalatable, what is the use of light to change tableware" words dismissed. This was released last February 7 microblogging comment number 3581. Carefully read can be found,chaussures nike pas cher, from between last February 7 to February 14, the microblogging only a few more than 10 comments. Since then it has been quiet in the micro-Bo, until last December 19, the media exposure stewardess dismissed because micro-Bo, this microblogging again dug out, suffered a large number of users to refresh protest. In these comments, about 3,000 more than are "little things,moncler outlet roma, but unpalatable, what is the use of light to change the cutlery " After this exposure, a large number of micro broad FINANCE celebrities and all have forwarded the matter, "something less, and unpalatable, what is the use of light to change tableware" incident became popular vocabulary. In condemning the one-sided, but also the voice behind the Virgin, Some netizens commented, "When the boss who will spend money to hire such employees " Hot friends Tucao quietly may be expelled In fact, the case is not the first, in September 2011 as a result of Microsoft employees in the microblogging leaked Nokia WP phone dismissal; early in 2012 because of the Patriot digital employees in Wuhan microblogging cursed and expelled. Perhaps the original intention of the company's employees harmless rhetoric, but in the micro-Bo has become a weapon when public utterance and Oversight, said the speaker has no intention listener interested, can easily lead to misunderstanding and even negative impact on the company's reputation, interests objectively; however, blindly stop freedom of expression of employees, it is difficult for the company to provide a platform for progress, is often stifled many interesting criticism, will exacerbate the deterioration of relations between the employer and the employee, in the long term development of the company and individuals have no benefit . &#160,cappelli nhl; In fact, the employees of the company management have opinions is a very common phenomenon, as Apple has an internal speech occlusion, their employees will organize a "secret Tucao group", without revealing company secrets, customer privacy situation in anonymous communities " Tucao. " The "Tucao" or not is not the focus, with emphasis on the company's ability to guide employees Reasonable vent discontent, the establishment of channels for employees to provide advice confided internet. This can not only distraction for employees mood, speech provides a more appropriate way, you can attract a lot of valuable advice to the company, and will not allow these contain Jin's "Tucao" became no nutritional complaints and attacks. Related views What are the limits of freedom of expression of employees &#160,louboutin cachottière; Related lawyers pointed out that the law does not expressly prohibit the conduct is lawful, if viewed from this angle, the airline laid off staff and unreasonable. Employee handbooks and company policies and procedures signed by two flight attendants, belonging to the company regulations, and the company's employee handbook does not carry out the agreement in the labor contract. The stewardess comment is evaluation of objective things, and afterwards delete the micro-Bo,doudoune moncler paris, correct behavior, to minimize the adverse effects this may have caused,swarovski collane, the airline is only this personal evaluation will terminate the labor contract is not right. From the perspective of speech, "You have the right to remain silent, but what you say will become evidence in court." Huaqiao University Law School lecturer 王方玉 has said, is that the boundary of free speech rights and freedoms of others, in the law The requirement is not contrary to the basic provisions of the law, it can not cause violations of the legitimate rights of other subjects. Shanghai Institute of Politics teacher Shao Zhu Wen chapter has pointed out that from the perspective of freedom of expression, microblogging and other media is no essential difference, are the information media and freedom of expression platform. However, no responsible editor microblogging traditional media specially configured. But as microblogging registered users and should not therefore ignore the bottom line behavior, loss of speech responsibility,cappelli polo, micro-blog and traditional media,chloé lunette de soleil, like,new balance homme, have the obligation to abide the law, morality and discipline. Further legislative gaps, lack of standards and law enforcement fuzzy or ambiguous reasons also contributed significantly controversial. (Original title: stewardess with Virgin heated debate "freedom" and "loyalty") [See Sina news Win iPad mini] 
相关的主题文章：

DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: air max 90

urkma8w9u0i on "air max 90 "