<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: The Beijing News</title>
<link>http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/</link>
<description>DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: The Beijing News</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 05:07:25 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>v8nS6Aq3Sd on "The Beijing News"</title>
<link>http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/topic.php?id=307729&#038;page#post-335014</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>v8nS6Aq3Sd</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">335014@http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The Beijing News (Reporter Liu Yang) pilot candidates Xiaogang (a pseudonym) brush at the final hurdle after examination. He believes that record is rejected because he is &quot;Hepatitis B carriers&quot;, the Beijing Capital Airlines Limited (inaugural) to court, that the other side exists discrimination in employment, and ask for a public apology, paid 50,000 yuan for mental damages.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Recently, the case in Shunyi Court of First Instance hearing, the defendant refused to record Xiaogang said the reason is that the plaintiff failed intelligence test scores, not because it is &quot;hepatitis B carriers.&quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;  plaintiff&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Illegal search defendant &quot;HBV&quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For fear of exposure to privacy, Xiaogang did not appear in court, his agent,&lt;a href=&quot;http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/ebest-dvd/0000001114305.html&quot;&gt;http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/ebest-dvd/0000001114305.html&lt;/a&gt;, attended the hearing. The defendant as &quot;cadet&quot; details concerning grounds of commercial confidentiality does not apply for a public hearing, the Court has not been supported.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The plaintiff said that in September 2011,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arret-net.fr/link.php&quot;&gt;doudoune moncler pas cher&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mysignup.com/cgi-bin/view.cgi&quot;&gt;http://www.mysignup.com/cgi-bin/view.cgi&lt;/a&gt;, Xiaogang information submitted candidates, candidates inaugural pilots. After the interview, the initial inspection,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yanncapet.fr/link.php&quot;&gt;air max 90 pas cher&lt;/a&gt;, etc.,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ritex.it/temp.php&quot;&gt;moncler Outlet&lt;/a&gt;, when in November, received &quot;through the interview,&quot; As a result,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ac-grenoble.fr/ecole/74/ewues1.cluses/spip.php?article554&quot;&gt;http://www.ac-grenoble.fr/ecole/74/ewues1.cluses/spip.php?article554&lt;/a&gt;, placed Beijing Civil Aviation General Hospital medical examination. A few days later,&lt;a href=&quot;http://303310.com/thread-156499-1-1.html&quot;&gt;http://303310.com/thread-156499-1-1.html&lt;/a&gt;, he received notice that his examination showed as &quot;hepatitis B surface antigen positive&quot; (ie, carriers of the hepatitis B virus), the defendant decided not recruiting.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The plaintiff that the defendant's conduct is not only a violation of the plaintiff medical HBV markers, but also because the plaintiffs are hepatitis B virus carriers refusing to employ. The defendant's conduct violated the plaintiff's right to equal employment, employment discrimination practiced against hepatitis B virus carriers, affecting the plaintiff life and employment confidence. So, he sued the defendant a public apology,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dukeint.co.jp&quot;&gt;http://www.dukeint.co.jp&lt;/a&gt;, compensation for moral damages and 50,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.njhxny.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=2069712&amp;#38;fromuid=16320&quot;&gt;http://www.njhxny.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=2069712&amp;#38;fromuid=16320&lt;/a&gt;,000 yuan tolls and so on.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;  defendant&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Check the items not set&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The defendant said the agent, the defendant did not detect violations, the company just as the candidates undergo a medical examination in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Aviation Pilots and the Ministry of Health, which checks the project, location,&lt;a href=&quot;http://sonnino.sp.unipi.it/index.php?page=biografia&quot;&gt;hogan outlet online&lt;/a&gt;, time according to the relevant requirements of the Civil Aviation Authority. Plaintiff's intelligence test score of 28 points, 30 points away from qualifying score difference,&lt;a href=&quot;http://66.154.116.54&quot;&gt;http://66.154.116.54&lt;/a&gt;, the interviewer does not pass a decision by a comprehensive assessment. Therefore, the plaintiffs were not hired,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.m-pep.org/spip.php?article4038&quot;&gt;http://www.m-pep.org/spip.php?article4038&lt;/a&gt;, not because the test results of hepatitis B markers. In this process, the fact that there is no infringement defendant. So, I hope the court dismissed the plaintiff appeals.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Argument against the defendant, the plaintiffs objected: &quot;The plaintiff passed the interview and initial inspection included all aspects of intelligence test, was the notification examination, otherwise the defendant to the plaintiff is not lawful comprehensive physical examination.&quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The original defendant, the parties do not agree to mediation, the case was not in court for sentencing.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;■ focus of the trial&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Why the candidates refused entries?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;When the trial in this case, the focus of dispute between the parties is whether the plaintiff was eliminated due to any reason.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Plaintiff submitted three sections court record. In which a recording medium, a Zhao Xing Nvzi said, Xiaogang &quot;The reason does not pass the hepatitis B surface antigen positive,&lt;a href=&quot;http://uswebsitebuilder.com/temp.php&quot;&gt;piumini woolrich&lt;/a&gt;, the other measured the results are qualified.&quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The defendant said that the recording of the Zhao is not the maiden voyage of employees, but the defendant commissioned site staff recruitment.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Judge accused in court repeatedly asked: &quot;Suppose that all examination candidates meet the requirements, just examination results of hepatitis B surface antigen positive this one does not meet the requirements, the defendant will be recruiting you?&quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The defendant replied: &quot;The airlines themselves will not refuse to hire because of this one.&quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The plaintiff admitted that Zhao Xiaogang has been in the recruitment contacts, a recruitment site for employees.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(Original title: Pilot rejected candidates called because hepatitis B discrimination)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; (Edit: SN017)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
