v8nS6Aq3Sd on "the court ruled against Chen."

v8nS6Aq3Sd — Wed, 02 Dec 2015 04:11:55 +0000

(Reporter Wang Qiu) magazine reports that the distortion of the facts, damage to personal reputation, Beijing Union Technology Co., Ltd. Long Chen, former CEO of the "Chinese e-commerce," the magazine to court to require the defendant to stop infringement of its reputation and It claims 100,000 yuan. Yesterday, reporters learned,louboutin soldes pas cher, Haidian Court Fuxing Road, the court ruled against Chen. Chen said that in 2011 five "Chinese e-commerce" magazine, an article entitled "We are no longer brothers," the article made him into a reputation crisis. In this article,woolrich outlet,http://www.tianyakeji.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, Mr. Chen has been described as a salary increase for himself with unauthorized,woolrich outlet, illegal occupation of reimbursement and other means of company assets,http://palevo.com/gallery/displayimage.php?pid=104479/index.php/index.php, the company was eventually "driven out" of bad faith who was related to insiders as "top five evil "" shameless to the extreme. " Chen believes, "Brothers," a text of a dispute between him and the company's hype,http://thomassankara.net/spip.php?article1353,scarpe hogan, damaged his reputation, it shall bear civil liability. The Court found that, Mr. Chen reimbursement accounts during his tenure irregularities do exist,http://www.jinmeidsf.com/news/html/?47457.html,piumini woolrich sito ufficiale, but had also been reporting suspected positions occupied bail measures being taken to the public security organs according to law. The combination of these facts, the content can be identified "Brothers" article described the basic truth,http://www.shenjidaren.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=59856, though published articles citing "five evil" is,http://www.metabored.com/boards/viewtopic.php?pid=550634#p550634, but the term is a reference to the alleged others 'can be described as five evil', not article He is the author of the evaluation, so "Brothers," a text of Mr. Chen does not constitute an infringement of the right of reputation. Finally,http://www.8liuxing.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, the court rejected his claim. Yesterday, reporters in the Baidu search found involved in the article on the Internet can still be found. According to the article,http://www.wifigx.com/forum.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, he said suspected positions occupied after the incident, Mr. Chen was Beijing Technology Co., LTD removed from the CEO post. Share: welcome to comment I want to comment Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging (edit: SN014)

DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: the court ruled against Chen.

v8nS6Aq3Sd on "the court ruled against Chen."