d3i221izsrp on "hogan interactive organized by the Supreme People's Court"

d3i221izsrp — Wed, 02 Dec 2015 15:06:47 +0000

forced to pay." However, when the unit does not perform, how to enter the compulsory program, it is transferred to the executive branch by the criminal courts, the judicial police brigade execution, direct execution or criminal courts, is not specified.The Supreme Court "on the issues of applying the provisions of criminal property" Article 9 states: "People's Court sentenced the defendant should be considered the property of punishment according to the law.

seven-level courts found that the rate of criminal fines in place to perform a minimum of only 3%, generally not more than 20%, most of the fine penalty cases have not been effectively implemented. "Initiate an enforcement case basically no. Attitude taken by the majority of the Court is laissez-faire, is willing to pay to pay, do not want to pay is not mandatory. Even the implementation of accumulated cases carried out by the national courts, nor will perform most of the court cases criminal fine . put on the agenda "& nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp;The implementation unit fine penalty, apparently, and perform other cases are not the same. Perform other cases, there are victims in the supervision of public opinion in the supervision, "do not place other cases, victims every day to find the court, but does not perform criminal fine or do not place nobody cares." & Nbsp;Bribery penalty execution units exist blankThe paper also believes that many problems in the implementation of the criminal fine penalty cases exist, it can be attributed to the institutional,parajumper sale, legislative level.Code of Criminal Procedure Article 29, Article 220 clearly the executive organ of the court fines. However, the specific implementation of the department by the court, does not require, a blank appears on the legislation. The court take into account the assessment of various departments and other issues, we are afraid of the impact were resolved, so there is the Court's internal organization of the work of buck-passing.Article 53 of the Penal Code stipulates a fine "If he fails to pay.

which will be turned over to the state treasury stolen money, stolen money into the national unified fiscal, and then be distributed by the state.In judicial practice, there has never been "astronomical fines." Supreme People's Court "on the issues of applying the provisions of criminal property": "people's court should be based on circumstances of the crime, such as illegal gains, losses of size, and considering the ability of criminals to pay the fine, he shall be sentenced to a fine."Some scholars specifically explained that the decision to fine the amount of the "circumstances of the crime based, supplemented by the economic situation", should be concerned about the continued existence and development units, considering the unit inside the lives of workers, the role of emotions as well as units in the social and economic life and status, so not only play the role of punishment, and leave room so penalized in the objective unit can accept, as small as possible impact on its daily work and lives of workers.But scholars also proposed another form of discipline. JiangMingAn believe that corruption is not just a small group of collective punishment and responsible, and let Liyijunzhan who feel punishment.He believes that in Xiejiaji District School Board case, take the money of the workers should spit out the money for a fine cross units.Mr Hu believes that, to be held criminally responsible for the crimes committed by units of state organs, the financial sector should reduce its financial allocations for the following year, as a punishment.Mr Hu said that China's state organs budget is based on the amount of the previous year, as the next fiscal year's funding base, on top of this may go up a certain percentage."If the 'problem of units' financial allocations no less a point, but increased, and how to play the role of discipline?" He believes that this law-abiding unit is not fair.Fine penalty issueSome local "empty judgment" phenomenon prominentIn addition to the nature of the national authorities.

after the sentence is difficult to perform criminal fine, the problem is the law enforcement authorities to be considered.In December 2009, organized by the Supreme People's Court, the national court system, the National Judges College China Applied Legal Research Institute, jointly hosted by the People's Court Press, the twenty-first colloquium candidates'education all over. Tianshui City, Gansu Province, Vice-President from Qinzhou District Xing Yuan, research director Peng Aiming book "Bewilderment and regulate the implementation of criminal fines," won the third prize.The article said that the new Criminal Law in 1997 from punishing and preventing economic crime unit crime perspective, a significant increase in the scope of application of fine penalty, but in the current judicial practice, criminal fines "empty judgment", "little sentence" prominent phenomenon.The authors investigated an intermediate court.
相关的主题文章：

DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: hogan interactive organized by the Supreme People's Court

d3i221izsrp on "hogan interactive organized by the Supreme People's Court"