<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: At the same time</title>
<link>http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/</link>
<description>DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: At the same time</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:23:43 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>salkjHz5s0 on "At the same time"</title>
<link>http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/topic.php?id=337712&#038;page#post-365084</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 01:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>salkjHz5s0</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">365084@http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;23 papers were found cheating alter results invalid prosecution sought to withdraw the punishment of First Instance was dismissed sued again&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Translation candidates qualifications bathing evaluation report center&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(Reporter Wang Wei) When the National Translation professional qualification exam papers change a 23,&lt;a href=&quot;http://verdamilio.net/tonio/spip.php?article2462&quot;&gt;http://verdamilio.net/tonio/spip.php?article2462&lt;/a&gt;, was identified as cheating results invalid, candidates Wang will Chinese Foreign Office translation of professional qualification assessment center sued the court to set aside decision. Reporters today that a Court accepted the case.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wang participated in the first half of 2010 national translation of professional qualifications (level) French secondary examination, change the 23 in the papers in. Chinese Foreign Office translation of professional qualification assessment center as cheating. After he was taken to court,&lt;a href=&quot;http://serengetiwatch.org/moncler-a.php&quot;&gt;piumini moncler&lt;/a&gt;, the court revoked the decision.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Shortly thereafter, the evaluation finds its center again made invalid results. He pointed out that there are papers in the answer sheets obvious change 23,&lt;a href=&quot;http://pgy.chisa.edu.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=762446&amp;#38;fromuid=35974&quot;&gt;http://pgy.chisa.edu.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=762446&amp;#38;fromuid=35974&lt;/a&gt;, commissioned by the Beijing people's livelihood forensic identification evidence, that the 23 changes to the original writing letters and writing letters is not the same person. In accordance with the provisions of the papers identified as cheating papers, test scores invalid.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wang refused to accept the identification,&lt;a href=&quot;http://sunhotelsoft.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=394561&quot;&gt;http://sunhotelsoft.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=394561&lt;/a&gt;, evaluation center written decision he believes has been revoked before the court decision,&lt;a href=&quot;http://web.izhechen.cn/news/html/?68242.html&quot;&gt;http://web.izhechen.cn/news/html/?68242.html&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.trainminiatureoutlet.fr/&quot;&gt;moncler femme&lt;/a&gt;, the two decided to book based on the fact that basically the same. Assessment center can not prove that they cheat in the examination process, we can not prove that he had colluded with others at the end of the exam cheating.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;At the same time, Mr. Wang believes that evaluation center is to identify problems in the marking process and make decisions on their own,&lt;a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://witches.kabotya.com/apeboardplus/apeboard_plus.cgi/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://witches.kabotya.com/apeboardplus/apeboard_plus.cgi/&lt;/a&gt;\&quot;/&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kinderpiuvolleyblog.it&quot;&gt;piumini woolrich outlet&lt;/a&gt;, rather than find problems in the process of registration points. These are two different stages of the examination,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.parrucchieretilohairbeauty.it/&quot;&gt;moncler outlet online&lt;/a&gt;, evaluation center to make a written decision on error of law.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Court of First Instance that the assessment center is not inappropriate to make a written decision, Mr. Wang's lawsuit claims the lack of factual and legal basis for the decision to reject the claim.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Wang refused to accept the appeal,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democratie-socialisme.org/spip.php?article3550&quot;&gt;http://www.democratie-socialisme.org/spip.php?article3550&lt;/a&gt;, he thinks cheating evaluation center finds himself papers insufficient evidence, forensic evaluation center made both serious problems in the procedures and structure, evaluation center found no legal authority papers cheating in the process of boarding points. He requested the court to revoke the first instance verdict, revoke evaluation center decision.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The case is under further investigation process,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ysangna.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&amp;#38;ac=blog&amp;#38;blogid=&quot;&gt;http://www.ysangna.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&amp;#38;ac=blog&amp;#38;blogid=&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tonermoinscher.fr&quot;&gt;doudoune parajumpers femme&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595&quot;&gt;http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Welcome to comment I want to comment&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging (edit: SN026)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
