tvb136s69 on "hogan interactive said the rule of law"

tvb136s69 — Sat, 12 Dec 2015 16:29:55 +0000

so hit and run with the accused infringer Peng Youhong should bear joint and several liability. The plaintiff demanded in the case of other accused infringers to escape liability Peng Youhong compliance with the law, so the plaintiff requested the defendant Peng Youhong liability claims, court support. Because he had suffered several rain to hit locations are within the motor vehicle lanes, the court had ordered to bear the cost of rain 20% of liability, tort shall bear 80% of the liability. Finally, the court ruled that the defendant safe financial security Shudu branch company to compensate the plaintiff 310,000 yuan (including mental solatium twenty thousand yuan), the defendant compensate the plaintiff Peng Youhong 8 one thousand (already paid on the amount in advance two million after deductions) . Car owners assume all liability. Court retained a right of recourse: the defendant Peng Youhong liability may recover after the other infringers. For the rule of law on a number of weekend Longquanyi District Court hearing the details of the interview, but it was refused. A court insider said, when the District Court dealt with the case think they do a fine case, did not think public opinion has endured as one of the sap. "I did not run away, not really noble" First butt to walk away, leaving the last one to take responsibility, but bear all the losses. Once the case is reported, public opinion will be biased in one direction in the past. The court's decision is fair? After the butt that we are not all choose to escape? Throw a doubt, it seems to make people heart cool down, do not those responsible are really asking for trouble? Liu believes private car owners, who gave the final responsibility of a law-abiding alarm, the reason is wrong, to establish a social climate unfavorable. He also suggested: the Court can not immediately closed, party losses paid in advance by the government, which would also help to urge the police to solve the case as soon as possible.

trial accused the plaintiff of the problem little rebuttal. The fact is that the bulk of the insurance company." Reporters call attorney Zhouxi Bin, and asked him how to look at the current public opinion, he replied:. "A lot of people do not understand," a reporter asked how he viewed the court's decision, he said he did not accept any interviews, and claimed that his client no interviews with the media. Tai Fook believes exclusions original defendant collusion, inadequate reasoning flaws exist in this case at least the court. "Judging from the verdict, there is no evidence to prove the existence of the owner Peng Youhong drinking, motor vehicle breakdown, speeding fault, but also set out on a traffic accident can not confirm clearly defined responsibilities Tort Law Article: The perpetrator because fault against the civil rights of others, it shall bear tort liability. fault including intentional and negligent, then Peng Youhong it too is wrong? " Tai Fook that the case, the court has the responsibility to pass on Peng Youhong former car owners too. "Even if the court finds that Peng Youhong 'failed to fulfill its obligation to drive carefully,' but therefore allowed to bear 80% of the responsibility.

not to mention. Peng Youhong 28,000 yuan to pay the price, with the way the law to solve the problem, no troubles, he does injustice, can only say that he is He did what he should do, and it is a wise move. " Tort law expert Professor Yang Lixin weekend in an interview with reporters, said the rule of law: "From a legal perspective, the court sentenced the case was not a problem according to the provisions of Article XI Tort Liability Act, tort Several people, everyone. All the reasons damages, jointly and severally liable to now only found the plaintiff caused the damage of the last people claim compensation according to the principle of joint and several liability, is possible, so the court did not issue a judgment. Now, after the defendant liable, should think find other ways to harm people, to find after their claim for compensation, they can restore their losses. " Lawyer Dai Fu believes that behind this case, the defendant can not be ruled out collusion insurance companies for compensation possible. "Both sides have agreed not to autopsies.

to establish righteousness. In his view, the elderly and the elderly have been lying on the ground does not move down the road compared to the case, the possibility of a smaller driver can avoid, that no matter what is in front of larger vehicles first hit responsibility, there are witnesses to prove the accident not a person under the circumstances, not a law-abiding citizen should be allowed to bear all the responsibility. not entirely agree with this view, he said in accepting the rule of law Weekend reporter, he said: "butt, and did not run away, not really noble ran once been recovered,hogan scarpe uomo 2014, not only civil compensation is inevitable, but also have to face three years. more than seven years of imprisonment without probation. driver's license was revoked for life.
相关的主题文章：

DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: hogan interactive said the rule of law

tvb136s69 on "hogan interactive said the rule of law"