sdvshj6a on "to let the public question the credibility of public color"

sdvshj6a — Fri, 18 Dec 2015 20:04:20 +0000

Along the bank transfer receipt shows that "14 July 2008" has been a huge bonus go to Guangzhou City Welfare Center. After the thread of the article online, that someone in the forum and posted a bank stamp obvious as "2009," the transfer back to a single photo (and the reporter saw the transfer back to a single agreement). Netizen "hotel intern" and think, there must be a party PS the picture. To see how other people receive prizes! In 2004, the Massachusetts lottery lady Williams, a $ 294 million prize, she openly discloses to receive the bonus. (Reporter Zhou Jo) yesterday morning, Guangzhou acquire 96.68 million yuan color ball winner, from the Guangzhou Municipal Welfare Lottery Center to pick up their prize. Meanwhile, the winner Luk (a pseudonym) to Guangzhou and the Guangzhou Municipal Charity nursing home each donated one million yuan. July 2, Mr. Lu in Guangzhou Lottery was ShuangSeQiu 2,009,076 first prize, only 96.68 million yuan in prize money. Lottery the next day (July 3) afternoon, Mr. Lu to Guangdong Welfare Lottery center for the awarding recount procedures. July 14, the Guangdong Provincial Welfare Lottery Center received the National Welfare Lottery Center Duijiang allocated bonus, the same day by the Agricultural Bank wire transfer will be the first grand prize of 96.68 million yuan color ball 2,009,076 prize money allocated to the Guangzhou City Welfare Lottery Center. July 20, 96.68 million yuan winner to Guangzhou City Welfare Center received more than 77.75 million yuan after tax cash a check. Yesterday receive the grand prize, winner Luk expressed the desire to Guangzhou and the Guangzhou Municipal Charity nursing home donated one million yuan each, the City Welfare Center contacted more units, so the winner to realize his wish. Tax is 18,937,000 It is reported that, according to "individual part of their income through social groups within the territory of China, the State education authorities and other public welfare donation of China's personal income tax law, the 30% of their donations are not part of the taxpayer's taxable income declared exceeded, its taxable income can be deducted, "the provisions of the income tax exemption donors donate part. Winners of the original tax 19,336,http://www.colepicasso.es/spip.php?article242,000 yuan,nike air max 90, the actual tax to 18.937 million yuan. After the donation, he said the winner, "The money I was used up, the future will be through other means, other ways to donate to various welfare institutions and units." The last two days, 96.68 million grand prize in the network news has lit one. However, this is no longer the people envious of hundreds of millions of bonus let a person have to go,http://lauzyprygdjerwwprqqq.seesaa.net, but some have questioned the authenticity of the grand prize. On Saturday, the "Shenzhen Economic Daily" public reports, "nearly billion a year ago,woolrich outlet, picking up bonus?" The article attracted netizens hot overwhelming. After the incident Shenzhen Welfare Lottery hacking incident, questioned the authenticity of the lottery voice sounded again. What incentive is also very simple, that is 96.68 million yuan transfer receipt issued by a bank, "Shenzhen Daily," the article questioned the transfer back to a single seal cover of a year ago. Faced with the hustle and bustle of a crusade and questioned, Guangdong Province Fucai Center yesterday to respond quickly, that the report seriously inaccurate, and require them to make a public apology. Text / reporter Zhou Zuo Question 1 In advance to accept the award? Guangdong Lottery prize ever --9668 ten thousand yuan color ball jackpot prize has been transferred to the Guangzhou Municipal Welfare Lottery Center. Along the bank transfer receipt shows that "14 July 2008" has been a huge bonus go to Guangzhou City Welfare Center,http://www.ciscoclub.com.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=,moncler pas cher, obviously 2 July 2009 Japan's prize, Why would receive a bonus a year in advance? ! (Left) ...... Correspondent bank seal Figure rotated 90 degrees,http://seo-directories.info/regist_ys.cgi, after careful identification, and use tools to enlarge the bank stamp, year really like "2008" instead of "2009"! "Hackers tampering with the data," the aftermath is not flat,http://natyuraltste.3rin.net, such things happen again, ball of public trust may in turn be tested? Welfare Centre's explanation was, "the bank made a mistake, transfer back to a single date should be July 14, 2009, instead of July 14, 2008, just a number on the seal did not change over." - See "Shenzhen Daily," July 18 A14 version Provincial Welfare Lottery Center Response: This article two false Yesterday morning, the Guangdong Provincial Welfare Lottery Center held a press conference to clarify the matter, and sent a letter to the newspaper to demand a correction. Director of the Guangdong Provincial Welfare Lottery Center Huang Yan Bing interview with reporters, said the presence of two false article. First, the transfer back to seal the lid on the list obviously is July 14, 2009, the authors say is unverified 2008. Second, the authors say who interviewed Welfare Centre, but whether it is transferred back to a single issue of the Guangdong Provincial Welfare Lottery Center or Shenzhen Welfare Lottery Distribution Center, the staff did not accept the author's interview. User reasoning The more conceal it, the more doubt there is tricky Lottery Although the issuer has repeatedly stated that the lottery is "open, fair and transparent", but the majority of Lottery reasonable proposals on the lottery, supervision and other aspects of deaf ears. Its truth is as just trumpeted as "Our product quality is very strong, please rest assured consumption" like the slogan, but the product quality control indicators, but secretive, I ask,piumini woolrich, how to convince the public? This is a major event in the relationship between social welfare benefits, for various reasons can not be kept confidential. Our comrades buddies Welfare Centre, can not always play the mysterious play dodge, always conceal it, Lottery even more reason to suspect that transmission of the disease. The parties concerned should come immediately effective measures sufficient to convince the public, starting from the lottery, capital flows and other sectors, completely blocked and eliminate the possibility of cheating on the various processes from fraud! Lottery must give a clear view,http://joy-bells.seesaa.net, let Lottery to buy a happy, buy with confidence! - Transfer from Mop. Posted: Gongsun Regulus Post Time: 2009-07-10 Reporters Survey: image copy from the authors say online In order to verify the alleged online bill is wrong, our reporter yesterday, specifically in the provincial Welfare Centre access to the original bill goes turn. In the bill, the reporter witnessed, above the bank seal does clearly show is "2009", instead of "Shenzhen Daily," the article called "2008." Provincial Welfare Lottery Center confirmed that the provincial Welfare Lottery Center and did not send any pictures of the transfer order to the "Shenzhen Economic Daily" reporters, he said the person, I do not know where to find the reporter is transferred bill fuzzy picture,http://wx.jazzsynth.com/wxcgi/kizai/sunkizai.cgi?mode=form&no=69&page=2", and as written in the article. Last night, reporters also interviewed the reporter writing the text. The reporter admitted that this figure he is also copied from the Internet, images rather vague, so I think the date stamp on the "2008." Welfare Centre to see the statement after he felt a lot of pressure, but also feel embarrassed. Question 2 No one has seen the winner? Before each lottery, the country will be entertained data, and transfer to FC (Welfare) Center, then FC center statistics, sales statistics, conduct lottery. After the lottery, FC announced the winning data center. Note by FC center in Beijing search statistics, not what from Shenzhen FC and FC over the search data, search for winning note currently reported, and reporting. ...... June 12 has been to establish the truth, to July 8 Qijiang still looking for? ...... As a media person, until now I have not spoke to a true winner, who is not even think of winning, but they can often be seen who the lottery jackpot in the newspaper, how to accept the award, award acceptance speech reports, this is not true of our media interviews out, and are FC center news release. Gansu hundreds of millions of award,http://www.ciscoclub.com.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, Harbin 60 million prize, 50 million prize Zhuhai, Guangzhou and 90 million prize ...... I have not heard a fellow winners seen. Under a very simple conclusion is that if the award is true, in the media to ensure that people do not sell winning personal privacy information, if we interviewed jackpot winner FC center can help promote sales. But so far, I am sure that the newspaper where I, and my colleagues know, in addition to the center to see the FC Write your own press releases, we did not see a so-called winner. This occurs after the Gansu awards, there have been a collective questioning of the media. - Transfer from Jagged Community Reporters Survey: more than witnessed Winner The above statement, by the industry veteran reporter lottery line consistent rebuttal. This reporter in an interview more than three years in the lottery, many saw the grand prize winner. Another senior correspondent for many years in the lottery line, "Information Times" reporter Chen steel lottery version says that the network statement said it is nonsense, he interviewed many years engaged in the lottery, has witnessed most of the grand prize winner appeared to accept the award, including 90 million yuan last winner Luk. Chen reporter's argument has also been a number of Guangzhou city ran the lottery line mainstream media reporter's identity. No reporters have seen on the whole Chinese winner does not stand lies verification. Welfare voice: confidential names not be published Reporters also interviewed on the matter, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou City Welfare Center Duijiang staff responsible for handling, they reflect are rumors that these networks are very confusing, because each winner will appear in their flesh and came to interview Reporters in front. "These winners all have identity cards and other proof of identity. Only for the winners of the need for confidentiality, we can not publish their real names and identity. I do not know who is spreading these words." Guangzhou City Welfare Financial Center, said. News Analysis: There are rumors of shadow Lottery Coincidentally, on Welfare "trouble" saying the recent steady stream network, who is in for Fucai it? Lottery within an industry veteran, told reporters that now there are a lot of folk Underground Lottery, for the benefit of these private lottery, public order and national color, "competition", often on the Internet to make some rumors, to let the public question the credibility of public color, The purpose is self-evident. Meanwhile,piumini moncler sito ufficiale, the phenomenon on Welfare "false" remarks in a great market online and offline, and in recent years lottery frequent problem, a lack of public trust in public about color.

DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: to let the public question the credibility of public color

sdvshj6a on "to let the public question the credibility of public color"