<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: he said in a blog Gongmou fabricated</title>
<link>http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/</link>
<description>DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: he said in a blog Gongmou fabricated</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>mlanf8727041 on "he said in a blog Gongmou fabricated"</title>
<link>http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/topic.php?id=364907&#038;page#post-392600</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 05:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>mlanf8727041</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">392600@http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(Reporter Wang Qiu) accused the owners of residential property on the blog posting &quot;low quality&quot;, &quot;abusive owners&quot;, and mentioned the name of the developer boss Joe. Joe do this before the owners prosecuted criminally, and then bring a civil action to withdraw the claim for moral damages. Yesterday, reporters learned,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.m-pep.org/spip.php?article4012&quot;&gt;http://www.m-pep.org/spip.php?article4012&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.comoves.unam.mx/link.php&quot;&gt;louboutin pas cher&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.altritaliani.net/spip.php?article248&quot;&gt;http://www.altritaliani.net/spip.php?article248&lt;/a&gt;, Tongzhou's Court dismissed the lawsuit Qiaomou request.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Last May,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democratie-socialisme.org/spip.php?article3522&quot;&gt;http://www.democratie-socialisme.org/spip.php?article3522&lt;/a&gt;, Tongzhou Fu River Park residential property owners Gongmou published in the blog Bowen, the paper relates to residential property charges,&lt;a href=&quot;http://sy2shou.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=2045300&amp;#38;extra=&quot;&gt;http://sy2shou.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=2045300&amp;#38;extra=&lt;/a&gt;, the industry committee was established,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davidmurry.com/class.php&quot;&gt;louboutin femme&lt;/a&gt;, conflict with the owners of the property,&lt;a href=&quot;http://uswebsitebuilder.com/temp.php&quot;&gt;woolrich outlet milano&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://framasoft.net/spip.php?article1077&quot;&gt;http://framasoft.net/spip.php?article1077&lt;/a&gt;, and referred to the developers of the district general manager Joe's name, and accused him of &quot;brute force the owners ordered the construction workers&quot;, &quot;property now only know to make money, quality bias&quot; and so on. This blog was viewed 53 times, 11 times comments. In February, Joe filed criminal private prosecution to the court, sued Gongmou libel,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sddistribution.fr/contacts.php&quot;&gt;nike air max 90&lt;/a&gt;, but then they apply for withdrawal. In the meantime, Gongmou deleted blog.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Since then Joe has filed a civil action, he said in a blog Gongmou fabricated, fictional unwarranted problems, his personality and reputation slander,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boccondivino.com/link.php&quot;&gt;woolrich outlet italia&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xingtai5188.com/shenghuo/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=63892&amp;#38;fromuid=12687&quot;&gt;http://www.xingtai5188.com/shenghuo/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=63892&amp;#38;fromuid=12687&lt;/a&gt;, malicious slander they are riffraff Tongzhou District, a serious violation of his personality, reputation. He asked Gongmou stop abuse, rehabilitation, and to eliminate the impact of a public apology in the media; notary fees 2,420 yuan compensation for moral damages 40,000 yuan. Gongmou argued that the article is reproduced on the blog, the article is only for property companies, spread range is not great. He believes that the residential property services fail, property owners and other companies gathered others to beat &quot;are facts.&quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The court held that Gongmou published Bowen is reproduced, and mainly for the residential developers and property companies, Joe despite a legal representative for the company, the shareholders,&lt;a href=&quot;http://demo.8555.net/4037_6929/service/feedback_look.php?id=69076&quot;&gt;http://demo.8555.net/4037_6929/service/feedback_look.php?id=69076&lt;/a&gt;, but his personal reputation and the company is not the same. At the same time Joe also failed to provide evidence that Bowen Gongmou reputation caused him actual damage,&lt;a href=&quot;http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595&quot;&gt;http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595&lt;/a&gt;, lower social evaluation. In addition, Gongmou Bowen published in the relatively intimate personal blog, and has promptly removed, not widespread, and therefore dismissed the Qiaomou claim.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
