o3qS2Aw5S on "after a former employee sued Xu"

o3qS2Aw5S — Mon, 28 Dec 2015 16:08:27 +0000

(Reporter Sun Siya) due to fraudulent use of the name of the company that the former employees flicker customers,http://orangebeer.com/fantasy/fantasy.cgi, Beijing International Investment Consulting Company (hereinafter referred to as Division) on his website published notice, said the name of former employees as "wrongful people ",http://www.itanon.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1229923, and announced his name. Yesterday,http://cgi4.synapse.ne.jp/~hazakura/cgi-bin/friends/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=80/, reporters learned, after a former employee sued Xu,http://www.liangzekeji.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=248569, City Court judgment Division infringement. Woman sued Xu said,hogan rebel, in July 2010,http://www.altritaliani.net/spip.php?article213, Division in Chinese rail online publication of the "Chinese urban rail transit Netcom divisions", circulars publicly accused her in false propaganda and deceptive sales activities. Xu said that the content of advertisements are fictitious, requiring Division apology, rehabilitation,piumini woolrich, compensation for loss of reputation and mental costs 10,000 yuan, notary fee of 1,http://dietexperience.seesaa.net,000 yuan. It is understood that Hua Qiugong company is Chinese urban rail transport network (www,http://www.px521.net/home.php?mod=space&uid=24130.ccmetro.com) registrants. The company said in the announcement, former employees of the company conference Xu theft marketing programs,http://www.beamed.com/search/search.cgi, customer lists and contact information, wantonly engaged in false advertising and deceptive sales activities with, and an indication of Xu's announcement last name, birth Year of job information and pre-departure. Division said the company is after the legitimate rights and interests have been seriously violated, it was necessary to clarify the behavior in time, they do so in order to eliminate the customer's questions and complaints, to clarify facts and publicity, is responsible for themselves and their clients. Court that Division did not provide evidence to prove the fact of infringement Xu exist, but the use of insulting words in the circular,tiffany milano, has exceeded the limits of normal comment, and notice the name Xu also pointed out that Xu's personality suffered derogatory. Accordingly,roshe run pas cher, the court Xu Hua Qiugong Division compensation for moral damages 1500 yuan, notary fee of 1,peuterey outlet,000 yuan. Welcome to comment I want to comment Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging (edit: SN009)

DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: after a former employee sued Xu

o3qS2Aw5S on "after a former employee sued Xu"