<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: 57nsdzUYt3</title>
<link>http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/</link>
<description>DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: 57nsdzUYt3</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:58:23 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>vb7aB4mxH on "57nsdzUYt3"</title>
<link>http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/topic.php?id=367804&#038;page#post-395518</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2015 06:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>vb7aB4mxH</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">395518@http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I'm the old man a dispute with the crew on the train,&lt;a href=&quot;http://kp82m.com/home.php?mod=space&amp;#38;uid=6362&quot;&gt;http://kp82m.com/home.php?mod=space&amp;#38;uid=6362&lt;/a&gt;, after being tied train staff carried on Qujing green belt of Station Square crosswalk. Later, the court verdict Railway Bureau adhere to mental damages claims to old Lin apology,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.orangesite.it/temp.php&quot;&gt;moncler Outlet&lt;/a&gt;, I'm the old man. Both parties refused to accept the appeal to the Kunming Intermediate People's Court. Recently, the second instance Court made the final judgment,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davidmurry.com/class.php&quot;&gt;louboutin femme&lt;/a&gt;, verdict revoked.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;After the verdicts,&lt;a href=&quot;http://uswebsitebuilder.com/temp.php&quot;&gt;woolrich outlet milano&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xiyatour.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&amp;#38;ac=blog&amp;#38;blogid=&quot;&gt;http://www.xiyatour.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&amp;#38;ac=blog&amp;#38;blogid=&lt;/a&gt;, the plaintiff and defendant both sides appealed to the Kunming Intermediate People's Court. &quot;Since the Court of First Instance finds Kunming Railway's conduct did not constitute an infringement of the right to liberty and reputation,&lt;a href=&quot;http://ydlog.com/viewthread.php?tid=204570&amp;#38;extra=page%3D1&quot;&gt;http://ydlog.com/viewthread.php?tid=204570&amp;#38;extra=page%3D1&lt;/a&gt;, why Kunming Railway Bureau also requested an apology?&quot; The second trial, Lin Guoxiang requested the court to revoke the first instance verdict, commuted Kunming Railway bundling their father's behavior against the right of reputation.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Kunming Railway Bureau believes that Lin Guoxiang behavior on the train in a certain social harm, and therefore its staff to take measures against Lin Guoxiang, no subjective fault, not illegal, does not constitute Lin Guoxiang liberty and reputation right infringement verdict It belongs error of law. Kunming Railway Bureau requested the court to revoke the first instance verdict,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davidmurry.com/class.php&quot;&gt;louboutin soldes femme&lt;/a&gt;, dismissed Lin Guoxiang of commuted.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Second instance court that the train is running, Lin Guoxiang fall smashing items, curse and mental disorders, marshals and train staff to use tape their hands and feet tied to limit action. According to relevant regulations, &quot;Railway Law&quot;, marshals and train staff to take measures to stop acts of Lin Guoxiang justified,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boccondivino.com/link.php&quot;&gt;piumini woolrich&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://club.zhanzhang9.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=438793&quot;&gt;http://club.zhanzhang9.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=438793&lt;/a&gt;, compliance with the law,&lt;a href=&quot;http://karamja.net/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=393470#p393470&quot;&gt;http://karamja.net/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=393470#p393470&lt;/a&gt;, does not constitute an infringement of the appellant Lin Guoxiang liberty, reputation. After the train arrived Qujing station with limited at this time is to limit the continuation of the behavior of the train, and the time is short; the entire process was accompanied by his wife Lin Guoxiang Lin Guoxiang,&lt;a href=&quot;http://my.5754.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&amp;#38;ac=blog&amp;#38;blogid=&quot;&gt;http://my.5754.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&amp;#38;ac=blog&amp;#38;blogid=&lt;/a&gt;, did not raise any objection, Kunming Railway is not at fault, does not constitute an infringement of personal Lin Guoxiang liberty, reputation. Kunming Railway pronounced its verdict on Lin Guoxiang not constitute infringement, but the judgment of its apology,&lt;a href=&quot;http://changsanyin.com/home.php?mod=space&amp;#38;uid=1086&quot;&gt;http://changsanyin.com/home.php?mod=space&amp;#38;uid=1086&lt;/a&gt;, improper applicable law. Ultimately, the court ruling, revoked Kunming Guandu District People's Court (2008), a public-private Chu Zi No. 2981 civil judgment,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hyfruida.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&amp;#38;uid=127481&quot;&gt;http://www.hyfruida.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&amp;#38;uid=127481&lt;/a&gt;, dismissed the claims of Lin Guoxiang. Reporter Zhao Yong&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
