trkbiIu1l8 on "wB9U6mVcLr"

trkbiIu1l8 — Fri, 08 Jan 2016 22:16:55 +0000

"Criminal Law Amendment (h)" this year on May 1 implementation, an increase of "burglary into the penalty" clause. Yesterday,moncler pas cher, more than 3:00, in Xigang Gorky Road, a hair salon, a burglary was arrested thief. Some people pointed out: Although the thief did not have the stolen goods, but according to this provision, the thief will bear criminal responsibility. So, for such acts of judgment and understanding of the nature, the city of the judiciary if there is a change in practice it? Reporters interviewed. Lying on the ground unconscious thief loaded Incident salon near Gorky road. At the time, these men broke down the thief with bricks salon window,Parajumpers Pas Cher, then enter the room ready to steal. The thief did not expect the store actually was. It turned out that night, a female clerk sleeping in the salon of a room. When the glass was smashed, he issued a fierce sound. After the clerk was awakened and found that someone walked into the inner hair salon. Clerk be no small shock, but she quickly stabilize their emotions, in the case did not disturb the thief, called the salon owner's phone. According to witnesses, salon owner lived in the salon backyard. After receiving the message, the salon owner immediately rushed to the scene,air max pas cher, but the scene in front but dumbfounding: thief even lying on the ground,chaussure Louboutin pas cher, seems to have no consciousness. In the rush to the salon, the boss has been reported to the police. Alarm, Xigang Public Security Bureau police station immediately rushed to the pro-democracy street. At this time, the original "unconscious," the thief actually awake. The original, in order to evade responsibility, the thief actually fell faint installed. Curiously,peuterey spaccio outlet, on the ground inside the salon, there is something like a pie,, the food there was bite marks. It turned out that after the burglary, the thief, who opened the refrigerator,i3aq8PWj63, pulls out the inside of the food to eat a few bites. Witnessed people said that this thief is north of the three cities who provided identity cards due to be false, and therefore can not verify their exact age. According to face judgment, the thief should belong to minors, but there may be over 16 years of age. It is understood that the thief had previously played in a nearby cafe for a few days, because they have no money, they moved or evil. "Burglaries into the penalty" should be uniform standards In the "Criminal Law Amendment (eight)", the new addition of the "burglary", "pickpocketing" clause and the punishment of the two cases. The present case, the thief has been smashing windows burglary, theft and motivation does exist. However, despite the thief turned the cabinet is very messy,zg7t19kO5N, but his body was not stolen. During the interview, some people pointed out: Under the new terms, the thief should bear criminal responsibility, that is, "caught on the sentence." However, the salon owner has become very tolerant: "He was a child, perhaps because very hungry before implementation of the theft, hoping the law can temper justice with mercy, give him a chance, not sentenced." Currently, the thief has been identified as burglary. "Although the burglary and burglary is just one word, and probably almost literally, but in practice, there are nuances." Police official said,yrv5qFUvS8, "burglary" refers to all private with a closed nature space, which includes housing, public buildings and other places; and "home" are often specific to residential. Click here to understand, since the thief did not steal the thing, and belongs to the "Non-burglary", then this name is still a minor thief can avoid bear criminal responsibility. A law experts believe that if the inquiry in the end, in ordinary life,8lWa6slKpm, "burglary" and "home" are basically the same concept. In the new amendment,PC7N6D2SxQ, there is no clear boundaries and differences between the two. Therefore, since the standards are not the same,sAFGwDTmfb, it is easy to confuse the concept of consequences to the judiciary. Legislative Affairs Office of Dalian Municipal Public Security Bureau official said, after careful inquiry, to distinguish between the two, there is no special judicial interpretation. Judicial practice,KL3AH190Va, into the room theft is often used as an aggravating circumstance, to be more severe punishment. In the case of the transfer of public security organs to the prosecution, the thief whether bear criminal responsibility, but also after the prosecution depending on the specific case, according to their behavior harmful to society size, in order to make a decision to arrest or not. A law called for: national authorities should promptly introduce relevant rules and interpretation, so as to avoid the formation of a variety of different understandings of embarrassment. Currently, the case is still under further work. Reporter Manchu fly Welcome to comment I want to comment Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging (edit: SN021)

DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: wB9U6mVcLr

trkbiIu1l8 on "wB9U6mVcLr"