v8nS6Aq3Sd on "Liu payment risk protection fund 50"

v8nS6Aq3Sd — Sat, 16 Jan 2016 15:00:54 +0000

Risk security fund to pay 50,http://ga5jyism.com/news/html/?73437.html,000 yuan, contracting hospital clinic, found no money, sued the hospital revoked the contract and return the Guarantee Fund. Haidian court the morning briefing, the two sides signed the "contract" in violation of the relevant provisions of the contract is not valid,doudoune moncler femme, the contractor ordered the hospital to return 50,000 yuan security payments. & Nbsp; & Nbsp; & nbsp; The Court also suggested that relevant departments should make violations of both administrative penalties and confiscated illegal gains. Doctors sue hospital contracting department & nbsp; & nbsp,http://www.senmon.co.nz,moncler Outlet; do not make money back guarantee gold & nbsp; In March 2011,http://www.zeroniroku.net, Mr. Liu and a hospital sign a "contract", contracting a hospital medical room, Liu payment risk protection fund 50,000 yuan. Mr. Liu said he later discovered that not many patients to seek medical treatment, his normal income after deducting costs,http://ww.yklog.com/viewthread.php?tid=222044&extra=, not as good as the previous high wages. Mr. Yu Shiliu sued the hospital, called for the repeal "contract" hospital risk refund guarantee gold. Hospital believes that Mr. Liu is wholly capacity for civil conduct. When signing the contract, the hospital has been fully informed of their rights and obligations related. The two sides signed the contract valid, there is no case law revocable. Hospital also believes that risk protection fund should belong penalty. Mr. Liu in August 2011 abruptly terminated fulfill the contract, has since repeatedly to disrupt its normal order of the hospital, to the hospital caused serious economic losses, so the risk protection fund should be returned. In the lawsuit, the hospital filed a counterclaim against Mr. Liu, the lifting of "contract" and asked Liu compensation for hospital operating income loss of 20 million. Court Hospital disguised sell "medical institution" & nbsp; & nbsp; The Court found that the two sides agreed to a medical hospital operating room to Liu, Liu pay rent,doudoune moncler soldes,http://bbs.zc09.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=146725, the hospital provides hospital outpatient department Mr. Xiang Liu of relevant documents. The agreement shows that the hospital in disguise to sell all of its "medical institution", in violation of the relevant provisions, the two sides signed the "contract" is invalid. Court hospital returned 50,000 yuan risk security fund. For hospital counterclaim,http://jshahandco.in/forum/profile.php?id=130290, the court held that the contract is invalid because the two sides, so Liu termination of the contract is not inappropriate conduct, dismissed the hospital demands. Court proposal Punishing illegal parties & nbsp; & nbsp; confiscation of ill-gotten gains Judge introduced, under "medical institution regulations" and "medical institution" not negotiable,louboutin soldes femme, lend, no entity or individual, without the "medical institution" shall not carry out treatment activities. Hospitals and Liu signed a contract, in essence,http://www.postyournipples.com, to avoid the administrative regulations of the prohibitions,piumini woolrich, thus illegal profits,http://bbs.xbkfw.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2967401, both sides are at fault. It recommends that the relevant departments of the two courts will be punished, and confiscated illegal gains. Text / reporter Li Kui & Nbsp;

DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: Liu payment risk protection fund 50

v8nS6Aq3Sd on "Liu payment risk protection fund 50"