sfkeiIOw9g on "a lot of popular science articles outdated content"

sfkeiIOw9g — Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:13:02 +0000

"The plants and animals into stone - fossil" - this from the domestic publishing house, a popular science books, since the launch of many questions raised by the investigation that, which is composed of more than 40 graduate students are publishing " gather "cobbled together a book: the book has more than the name of the fossil errors, such as" fish, crustaceans fossil became fossils, minerals, animal skulls became "error Illustrations abound. Such content is not scientific, and even many errors of popular science books, currently on the market is not unusual. As an important tool carrier and dissemination of scientific knowledge, improve public scientific literacy,, science publication appeared this serious quality problems, caused widespread concern in the community. Not only popular science publications so that the current scientific quality of our citizens generally low, the intensity of the science work is not enough, however,woolrich outlet milano, to let some of the old scientists worry that the community is a hidden secret surging "science useless", young do not want to engage in scientific research,moncler pas cher, especially basic research, it is the lack of high-quality scientific and technological talents. 40 people saved up a Mistakes of Popular Science Can think of it, one of the aims to "lead the adolescent love science, learning science, scientific," but there are many errors in the popular science books, (Wuhan) paleontology and paleoecology vertical Raven Masters posted online Chinese Geology University, said a real name as "plants and animals into stone - fossil," the book has more than ten names of the fossil error. "Only read dozens of pages, from the picture found many errors." Vertical Raven says he is seeing in this book in the library, and then feel very shocked. "'Ammonites' is a mollusk living in the sea millions of years ago, in the" fossil ", a book, Daisy was written conch fossils, snails, snakes and other fossils, and coral fossils have been written a 'snake bone fossil'. " This is published by China Social Sciences Publishing House, in March 2012 the first printing, the author of "Lin Jing," the book online Dangdang can easily be searched, and was introduced as "the Lin Jing edited" into stone animals and plants (fossil), "a book on fossils from all aspects of a comprehensive and thorough presentation, and with beautiful illustrations. illustrations that allows young people to have a comprehensive understanding of the fossil, provide a reference and practical significance for the future of learning Help. " It is understood that this "animals and plants into stone - fossil" is "Exploring science series" (set 100) is one. The series is currently in Beijing, a number of bookstores have sold books divided into material sciences, life sciences, geophysical sciences, modern technology four series, each book edited preface are "Lin Jing," the book of the words " This book is designed to give teenagers a systematic, comprehensive, accurate, in-depth study and master the basic knowledge of the natural sciences. " Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology researcher Deng Tao in look "into the stone of flora and fauna - fossil" this book says, vertical Raven noted error does exist. 50 years of research work in botany botany professor at Peking University College of Life Sciences in just half an hour Wangjin Wu discovered the book five errors. The science books curator named Wang Jun, he said, "Lin Jing" is a pseudonym, "" Research science series "took three years to complete. At that time, more than 40 organizations of the Chinese Academy of Sciences graduate students to write according to the outline, more than a dozen doctoral reviewers, academicians finally checks. When it comes to the wrong book, he claimed that it had "no comment", but also because the book has been listed more than six months, recovery is not realistic. Original quality popular science books worrying Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Popular Science Writers Association, Liu Jiaqi in an interview with reporters, said the research is not exactly the same with science,please reporters to help him find the child., research needs to explore, innovation, science and research is often good to have accurate scientific knowledge, maturity expressed, should the audience It provides a very accurate conclusions and concepts, but can not be ambiguous, but can not be wrong. He said that science workers must first have a good scientific literacy, scientific attitude and scientific ethics in the face of science can not pretend to understand or grandstanding. At the same time, science is a public good thing, anyone who wants to pursue profit through science or any other utility, can make the bad taste of science. Now on the market for some quality is not high, the so-called popular science books, a famous science writer, President of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Guo Yue Man United side have their own views, he said, popular science book market truly original, innovative works very little science, a lot of popular science articles outdated content, form a single, although the title is different, but similar content, a look that is another excerpt results compiled. "You look to the book town, you will find on the shelves of popular science books, although the title is different, but the content is about the same." In addition, our popular science works mostly limited to the dissemination of scientific knowledge, involve the spirit of science, technology values, research Too little work ethics, scientific thinking, scientific method. "Dissemination of scientific knowledge should be combined with the popularity of humanistic spirit up. Really produce profound and widespread impact of science reflected in the work of those who care, care for the fate of human life or human good works the late 1970s and 1980s First, the writer Xu Chi "Goldbach's Conjecture" influenced a generation or even generations, when young students in Chen's pursuit of science inspired by the spirit,On the 14th, the word back to buy lunch in the cafeteria line,he decided to steal their bank cards manner retaliate. Later, boil the oil lamps at night school to become a fashion of that period. The reason why such works can arise is with the author deep, rich human feelings spirit inseparable. "Guangming Daily deputy editor Fangzheng Hui expressed. Popular science books of poor quality leads to the shrinking market, Liu Jiaqi said, according to the survey,and after graduation went to , 16 percent of people in developed countries the United States each year to buy a popular science book, not even one percent of this ratio not to. It is learned that China's popular science books publishers involved in at least 100 or more, but by popular science book publishing, producing better economic publishers is very rare. In addition to a handful of the best-selling book, the popular science books in print runs mostly between 3000-5000. In sharp contrast, mostly from abroad-selling popular science book. In Hawking's "Brief History of Time" for example, the book since its inception in 1988, has been translated into 30 languages, worldwide sales of over ten million. Unwinding IT research firm research report statistics,The twins had just come home from school, in 2011 China had published 750 kinds of popular science books, an increase of 136 kinds of more than 614 kinds of last year (the children's science is not included in the statistics). Compared with the annual 200,000 kinds of books, popular science books of the retail market share for many years remained at only about 0.4%. "Scissors and paste" Popular Science can not make real "To ensure the quality of the works of science, we must pay attention to the construction of professional creative talents." Popular Science Publishing House, vice president, real editor Yan said. Now popular science books problems, because some publishers make no qualified social science who do work in this area. Like many original works of popular science plays like a set down a set of packages, and finally some of the graduate students are contracted to do. Many students may not necessarily be interested in science, but also the lack of professional training. Sometimes they tend to be from some of the information, and even find some content from the Internet. This "scissors and paste" the Popular Science's way, completely contrary to the original significance with creation science. Guo Yue Fang recommendations on the editorial staff who have made outstanding contributions in science and technology report, reporter or science writer should be rewarded; scientists engaged in science activities or creation science results, should be included among research institutes, examination and evaluation of the system, Whether in science will work as professional titles, job promotion conditions; the conditions of professional colleges may consider the establishment of science; the science education of input into the performance evaluation index levels of government. "China needs some 'you' out to do science work." Chinese Theory Research Office Institute of Popular Science, Professor Shi Shun,woolrich outlet italia, the "100 years ago, the United States of scientific reports have often wrong, distorted reporting and distorted reports, ulterior motives reported much later scientists stood out, the establishment of professional organizations and groups dedicated to refute or correct science fallacy in open publications. Even now, the United States there is a discovery center for non-scientific stuff were exposed and refuted,Nanjing Youth Olympic Games just held, including some great scientists,Gong Pei from Wuhan Municipal, like Bell, it is also dedicated to the public to clear up doubts. " Shi Shun said that science career development of so many years, the China Association now also offers financial and targeted support,tn reuqin pas cher, support, and supporting the creation of team creation science, but awards set enough to guide not strong enough, lead to an old problem: creative team Compare tender, no big science writer, difficult to show particularly good works to the reader. In addition, he believes that the domestic recommend good popular science books and informing the public is weak,piumini woolrich sito ufficiale, compared with foreign promotional expenses to account for the total Mayang first edition print run of 8-15% of the investment, we generally less than 1%. J177 (Original title: A dilemma Lanshu science behind)

DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: a lot of popular science articles outdated content

sfkeiIOw9g on "a lot of popular science articles outdated content"