<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: correspondent Liao Wei</title>
<link>http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/</link>
<description>DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: correspondent Liao Wei</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 16:15:11 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>gsdvhyhg1a on "correspondent Liao Wei"</title>
<link>http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/topic.php?id=386114&#038;page#post-414007</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>gsdvhyhg1a</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">414007@http://davidcadogan.ca/bbpress/</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The court held that the guardian default is the main reason leading to drowning and plaza security obligations have been fulfilled&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yangcheng Evening News reporter Xie Ying, correspondent Liao Wei, Li Shuping reported: Moumou children aged 3 and 5 year-old sister and 4-year-old cousin in a nearby rented play, accidentally fall into the pond, drowned.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;After the accident, drowning children think parents do not set the fence ponds on the edge, only to erect warning signs in the back of a brick, usually difficult to find. Then, their parents in violation of obligations on the grounds of security,&lt;a href=&quot;http://yasubeisushi.com&quot;&gt;http://yasubeisushi.com&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.histoiredrole.fr/&quot;&gt;canada goose pas cher&lt;/a&gt;, A group of villagers where the fish ponds,&lt;a href=&quot;http://bbs.10moli.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=6038&quot;&gt;http://bbs.10moli.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=6038&lt;/a&gt;, B village court, a request for compensation of 14 million yuan.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Coincidentally. 4-year-old had so its 5-year-old brother, go out to play, after being found drowned fountains certain square. Had so parents think, as a public place managers and owners of the two defendants involved fountain construction, maintenance, management flawed,&lt;a href=&quot;http://guanlie.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=2351&amp;#38;fromuid=66&quot;&gt;http://guanlie.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&amp;#38;tid=2351&amp;#38;fromuid=66&lt;/a&gt;, leading to a certain son had drowned accidentally fall into the pool of the main reason for spraying, so the pool of management by C center court, a request for compensation of 36 million yuan.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Dongguan City People's Court judge first introduced,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ristorantesanti.it/&quot;&gt;woolrich outlet italia&lt;/a&gt;, there are two cases in common when the accident occurred, the child's age is only three or four, belonging to no capacity for civil conduct, self-awareness and safety awareness is weak, due to the custody of a guardian present responsibilities, its practical routine monitoring and management. However, the above two cases, the guardians are not letting children accompanied by a guardian or other adult play, resulting in its scope from the guardianship and eventually lead to drowning accident, guardian of a child neglect to fulfill its monitoring duties, to deal with the drowning of children accident liability.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;And related facilities owners or managers of the need to assume responsibility for the accident,&lt;a href=&quot;http://marandy.foyer.be/spip.php?article2161&quot;&gt;http://marandy.foyer.be/spip.php?article2161&lt;/a&gt;, it should, as the case may be.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The first case, the Court held that, A group of villagers is the actual owner of the case involving fish ponds and managers,&lt;a href=&quot;http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/waiwai/gw-8900-1jf.html&quot;&gt;http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/waiwai/gw-8900-1jf.html&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tesoridiverona.it&quot;&gt;scrape hogan&lt;/a&gt;, but only one side in the incident ponds erected warning signs, warning signs are positive and stacked bricks blocked, there is a big security risk, hereby affirm the existence of management oversight A group of villagers,&lt;a href=&quot;http://meguru.jp/cgi-bin/joyful/./joyful.cgi&quot;&gt;http://meguru.jp/cgi-bin/joyful/./joyful.cgi&lt;/a&gt;, not entirely to reasonable security safeguards obligations, there is a certain death for Moumou fault, should bear 10% of secondary liability, the plaintiff 21,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gzxchd.com/news/html/?67837.html&quot;&gt;http://www.gzxchd.com/news/html/?67837.html&lt;/a&gt;,452.04 yuan . As for the B village, due to the plaintiff failed to provide direct evidence that it is the case involving fish pond owner or manager, so B village did not have the relevant security obligations, is not liable for damages.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The second case, the Court held that, C center as case managers wading pool, incurs security obligations. But the site of the incident is in the public leisure square, non-operating sites,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realestatesalento.it&quot;&gt;tiffany bracciali&lt;/a&gt;, therefore, the management center is relatively light duty C compared to the general business of the place, it should be able to fulfill the average person do to protect the general duty of care under that can avoid accidents is limited. When the incident involved the erection of a fountain in the middle has &quot;pool have electricity, do not leisure,&quot; the warning signs, has been able to prompt ordinary people to do this to the general duty of care, and the plaintiff did not prove the existence of security involved in the design and construction of fountains defects,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xiyatour.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&amp;#38;ac=blog&amp;#38;blogid=&quot;&gt;http://www.xiyatour.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&amp;#38;ac=blog&amp;#38;blogid=&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consorzioicaro.it&quot;&gt;hogan outlet&lt;/a&gt;, the Court accordingly finds that A center has taken certain precautions to fulfill the security obligations, to have a certain drowning there is no fault. Accordingly, the court dismissed all the plaintiff's claim.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(Original title: children aged 4 square pool drowning claims 360,000 families without court support)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
