bsduviud2e1 on "lUNoad8Y6Y"

bsduviud2e1 — Sun, 31 Jan 2016 06:04:34 +0000

Our reporter Wan Jing Two months ago, the work of Hubei little guy Wang (a pseudonym), one of the country's five hundred companies Baoding Great Wall Automobile Co., Ltd. affiliated enterprises - Baoding Great Wall Automobile Sales Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Great Wall Motors) to court because the little king that the company prohibits carrying hepatitis canteen staff to a violation of his personality rights; at the same time, little king also sued the company to force the dismissal of employees carrying hepatitis illegal. Recently,f4jcIE4px9, the case in Nan Shiqu Baoding,louboutin soldes femme, Hebei Province People's Court formally opened. In February 2010,piumini woolrich, Wang Little Great Wall Motor to attend medical benefits, was found hepatitis B positive,24a49l2p09, the company's operations center,Gz27zNfJ9O, the official regulatory requirements king do this little home treatment,jMl706sXFs, but was little king refused: "Hepatitis B Large Sanyang only carry the hepatitis B virus, hepatitis B patients are not able to live a normal life, to work. " The company then said the king would not let go to the company cafeteria to eat a little, little king tried to explain: "Hepatitis B only through blood,piumini moncler, maternal and sexual transmission, common meal is not contagious, not to mention the company cafeteria is Dining System." But the king still was a small meal card company to report the loss, can not continue to eat in the cafeteria. March 9, Great Wall Motor HR formal notice little king "in the afternoon do not come back to work",h57S3REoz9,moncler Outlet, on the grounds that "does not match with the company's corporate culture." April 2010, Wang commissioned a friend made a small court to Baoding South of infringement proceedings, requested the court to confirm that Great Wall Motor violations of its equal employment rights and privacy requirements of the Great Wall automobile apology and compensation for consequential losses. But Baoding Nan Shiqu court that the case belongs to labor disputes should first labor arbitration committee for arbitration. Baoding South of labor arbitration committee in August 2010 accepted the case. October 15, 2010, Baoding South of labor arbitration committee to make an arbitration award that the complainant and respondent Wang Little Great Wall Motor is equal consultation labor contracts,69LC3rOt5h, compliance with the law. Wang refused to accept the award small, the prosecution again to Baoding South of court. May 18, Wang received a little South of the Court's verdict. Judgment think, really existed between labor little king with Great Wall Motor, and both sides believe that labor relations has been lifted, but the available evidence is not the consensus view of the parties to terminate the labor relationship,louboutin pas cher, so the decision by Great Wall Motor illegal labor contracts Double pay economic compensation. For claims little king "HBV infringement" aspects of the judgment that the labor dispute does not belong to the jurisdiction of, the proposed plaintiff be dealt with separately. May 24, little king commissioned the anti-discrimination bono lawyers LiFangPing to Baoding Nam court filed a complaint. It alleges that,s69jslbaA1, in 2002 the United Nations released the "UN Global Compact" rule "to eliminate the difference between discrimination in respect of employment and occupation." The company claims to have more than the Great Wall as thirty-eight thousand employees of multinational companies listed in Hong Kong and its affiliated companies are not fulfilled due corporate social responsibility, a gross violation of human dignity and equality of employment rights of hepatitis B virus carriers. Little Wang requested the court to confirm the detection of hepatitis B Great Wall Motor's behavior violated their right to privacy; Great Wall Motor is not allowed to ask for confirmation in the company canteen act against his own personality. Great Wall Motor king little request a written apology and compensation for direct losses 5,000 yuan,1V081h10jJ, 30,000 yuan for mental damages. Li Fangping lawyers believe, according to China's food safety law implementing regulations prohibiting hepatitis B carriers to the cafeteria to eat in public practice is in violation of the spirit of the law, it is a carrier of hepatitis B virus and derogatory personal affront. Welcome to comment I want to comment Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging

DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: lUNoad8Y6Y

bsduviud2e1 on "lUNoad8Y6Y"