bc5n8F9l8 on "rDUVaG7AQF"

bc5n8F9l8 — Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:38:15 +0000

Morning News reporter Yao Keqin,http://bbs.kaiwind.com/kfclub/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1470521 Buy a house, the owners have to incur a mortgage, they will be required to pay a maintenance fund for future housing overhaul. However,http://www.noshironet.jp/bbs2/light.cgi?res=887, after a developer in charge of the maintenance fund owner, but the delay is not a payment solution into a special account, and this dragged on for more than ten years. In subsequent negotiations, since the owners have mostly get no documents at the time of payment, the developer refused to return this. Recently, the Huangpu District court developers within 10 days of maintenance funds into the account of the owners of the General Assembly, and to pay interest. Industry Authority audit found problems Involved cell was built in 1999, according to the plaintiffs, said the industry committee, when residential property owners in the purchase upon check-in, the owners will have to bear the maintenance fund defendant developers. In 2010, the industry,polo ralph lauren outlet, the Commission conducted a general cell, the newly established industry committee in the cell material verification process unexpectedly found that a maintenance fund account balance of more than 100 owners of "0" in the cell. Industry, the Commission further found that after verification,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/brandcouture/ac-4946.html, the original developers did not fund all maintenance solutions into a special account, the developer uses a portion of the maintenance fund collection, involving a total of more than 80 million. Since then, the industry, the Commission conducted negotiations with the developers, demanded the return of the owners of the maintenance fund. After much urging, the developer returned the 21 owners of the maintenance fund and interest, but for the rest of the 121 owners of the maintenance fund is not always agreed to return. To this end, the industry committee will developers to court, demanding the return of occupied maintenance fund, and interest payments. Housing rights changed hands several times Difficult Trial,http://finalstraw.blogbus.com, industry,ralph lauren soldes ,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/spark-inc/ballast-55wu-1set-1.html, the Commission provided information on the purchase of some owners. 1 9 floor of a building as the owners in March 2, 2001 signed a purchase contract, March 28 The owners paid a maintenance fund,polo ralph lauren italia, the developer issued a receipt; 1 8 floor of a building and the owner signed in September 2001 contract, the following year in August to pay maintenance fund and get a receipt. Despite various efforts, the industry committee ultimately found only 13 owners to pay maintenance fund receipts,louboutin femme, since the rest of the owners house changed hands several times, receipt has been unable to find. In this regard, the developers insist that whether the owner has a maintenance fund to the fact that the defendant, the plaintiff shall produce an invoice or receipt for evidence, the defendant agreed to return, otherwise it is not recognized. For the facts of the case,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/waiwai/aw-590-1ajf.html, the judge asked the developer to provide evidence had been transferred to the maintenance fund industry committee, but the developers said because the company management confusion, has been unable to find the relevant financial documents. The court presumes the owners paid funds After the court hearing that the industry committee to require developers to refund the maintenance fund, with the proviso that involved 121 owners have already paid maintenance fund. Case, the industry,polo ralph lauren pas cher, the Commission can only provide part of the owners of the maintenance fund payment vouchers, the developer is required to provide full payment vouchers. Thus, 121 owners had to pay in the end there is no maintenance funds became the focus of controversy in this case. The court held that the burden of proof from the capacity point of view, involving cell began selling in 1999 and many houses have been traded twice or even more than twice, therefore, require owners to fully proof the existence of certain difficulties. And according to real estate sales practice, developers in housing sales, from signing the contract,http://www.microhard.co.jp, the formalities, usually only circumstantial evidence exists that some owners purchase a sales model and procedures, practitioners provide the Commission can be seen,http://jibun.atmarkit.co.jp/ljibun01/rensai/genesis/164/01.html, the developer sales program exists to charge part of the maintenance fund. Accordingly, the court presumed owners in the purchase process has paid maintenance funds, developers should be 121 owners of the maintenance fund 689,414.42 yuan into a maintenance fund account and pay interest during the occupation. (Original title: 80 yuan to repair the 10-year occupation of the developer fund)

DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: rDUVaG7AQF

bc5n8F9l8 on "rDUVaG7AQF"