dfnjiof6t on "This disorder in the court"

dfnjiof6t — Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:50:19 +0000

Abandoned within ten years of the Beijing-Tianjin Garden Villa Core Tip: & nbsp; 2004 August Beijing and Tianjin Development Industrial Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Beijing and Tianjin Industrial), former general manager Wang Xiangning in the outgoing audit found suspected of job occupation of state-owned assets of about 10 million yuan, after the Langfang City, Guang Yang District people's Procuratorate prosecuted to the court, after hearing seven times (Ben June 2 has reported, reported,achat extensions cheveux, "company executives suspected of job occupation is not repeated trial judgment"). June 3, Langfang City, Guang Yang District People's Court of First Instance judgment, finds four facts constitute Wang Xiangning job occupation were insufficient evidence, so the prosecution of charges can not be established. Wang Xiangning sentenced the accused guilty. & Nbsp; "Verdict is really baffling -!? Embezzling company nearly a million people hit by the property acquitted Is that such a legal fight against crime,single-handedly created Zhang, protection of state assets" Recently, the Beijing-Tianjin Industrial agents, deputy general Surin Call this site, dwell dissatisfaction and doubts on the judgment of the trial proceedings. & Nbsp; Surin told reporters: "Beijing-Tianjin Industry joint-stock companies in 1992 to set up private placement, currently about 70% of the company is directly under SASAC central enterprises hold for such a ruling, the company shareholders' does not. promised 'requires us to follow the proceedings continue to fight for our rights "& nbsp..; "Who gave the court the power to press the case without trial" & nbsp; The provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law, the court case of public prosecution, sentencing should be within one month after accepting, not later than one and a half; provinces, autonomous regions, municipalities directly under the Higher People's Court approval or decision may be extended by one month; even Procuratorate extension hearing the application, the longest trial period is only nine and a half months. & Nbsp; Surin said:. & Nbsp; "case May 8, 2007 Prosecutor's Office for prosecution, the trial should have been completed according to legal procedures, but Guang Yang District Court of First Instance which lasted more than two years of actually hearing the case the first time was in July 2007 January 11, this time has been more than a half of the people's court longest jurisdiction limits, without going through the trial of the case, can not apply for an extension to the High Court and the people's Procuratorate have the right to apply for an extension trial. That is, the case in the first hearing has been illegal in the prosecution to trial within this period of time, Guang Yang District people's Court in doing who gives them the power to press the case without trial & nbsp??; Against the judgment of the & nbsp; "on the case to the higher court were to consult the hospital," Surin believes that "even if there really need to consult the problem, the higher courts should complete reply within the statutory jurisdiction limits I did not see which law. provisions of the lower court asked the report on the work between the statutory reason to extend the jurisdiction limits of "& nbsp.; "Who gave the court the power to reopen the case" & nbsp; Accordance with the "Code of Criminal Procedure" provisions, the prosecution case through the courts should be reviewed after the verdict. And case in August 9, 2007 has completed the trial, Wang Xiangning I also made a final statement in court, however,t quit your day job.”, the courts have been slow to sentencing law. Since Guangyang District Court jurisdiction limits severely overdue, a direct result of Wang Xiangning was released on bail. & Nbsp; October 28, 2008, Guang Yang District People's Court in the absence of any justification and the reopening of the case on the grounds that "Procuratorate added new evidence." Since the Guangyang District People's Court decided to reopen the case, resulting in Wang Xiangning defender and retracted in court on multiple charges of public prosecution against supplement their vulnerability. & Nbsp; May 21, 2009 the last trial,followed by Lee and water and, Wang Xiangning again for the prosecutor to testify add the appropriate file, and lead around the defense evidence and contradictory. & Nbsp; Surin told reporters: "In the course of the case aside, Wang Xiangning and their attorney to move around, to obstruct the case according to law and fair trial, and the use of their personal holding company's real reason for the rapid transfer of property case dragged on it.!" & Nbsp ; This disorder in the court,criminal detention or public surveillance. Therefore, several people in charge of the Beijing-Tianjin Co., really do not understand: "First, regardless of the case at this time has exceeded the statutory trial periods, if not exceed, the new evidence should only be cross-examination of evidence, rather than the case should be re-hearing who Guangyang District people's Court to grant the right to re-trial of the case "& nbsp.?; "Verdict: guilty of all the evidence to make a judgment of acquittal has adopted" & nbsp; "! Verdict is simply incomprehensible" Surin asked a few questions on the verdict: & nbsp; First, a lot of guilt evidence provided by the prosecutor in court, but was not listed in the verdict, naturally without the full court of review. In China, the law expressly provides that: all the evidence on cross-examination by the court must be reviewed,capelli corti, Guang Yang District People's Court why the only evidence of the guilt of the council,Wang old man from the seat out because of inertia, its real intention is for what? & Nbsp; Second, the trial court record without reading the Beijing-Tianjin Industrial agents confirm that, as a basis for judgment. Violation of the "Code of Criminal Procedure" provisions. Why court court records to hide? Such records also the credibility of it? As the basis for a judgment can be reassuring it? & Nbsp; Third,but also easy to the money, there is no reasoning verdict on the accused guilty of making arbitrary conclusions. The case of the Supreme Court have been advocating enhanced rational judgment that, while the case even in the judgment of the evidence the prosecutor presented all be adopted without any analytical reasoning, but it made a not guilty verdict. Evidence of guilt all adopted, there is no exculpatory refuted, why make a verdict of not guilty of it? & Nbsp; "What is leadership satisfactory reply" & nbsp; Wang Xiangning defense lawyer Li pile repeatedly claimed in court: "I Hebei provincial leadership office, the principal leaders of the provincial party committee stresses the case, the Politics and Law Committee and the leadership of the provincial party committee's attitude is very clear, we agree with the views expressed, and released Politics and Law Committee indicated to Langfang, "Beijing-Tianjin Industry official said:." we do not believe the remarks defense lawyer Li Zhuang, but what is puzzling is that after be prosecuted, Langfang Municipal Committee has repeatedly called Langfang public prosecutor,extension prezzi, three scheduling of the case on the grounds that 'superiors say in this case' for a trial period dragged "& nbsp..; Judge to delay the case from hasty judgment, court staff person in charge of Beijing and Tianjin Industrial speaking: "Recently a person to the secretary of the Hebei Provincial Langfang came,stating injured, asked us before he left Langfang case would give him a satisfactory answer. "Surin said he does not understand what is leading a satisfactory answer. & Nbsp; "There's Procuratorate pressure" In the case throughout the trial, the prosecution accused the defendant has a distinct attitude Wang Xiangning constitute a crime. The prosecutor's indictment last opinion is that the facts are clear, there is ample evidence, the defendant constitute a crime. & Nbsp; After the guilty verdict issued by the Beijing-Tianjin Industry to protest the prosecution made an application, Guang Yang District Procuratorate drew protest to higher offices. But now, from the time the verdict has been two months the verdict is already in force. Surin told reporters, relevant sources said that even if the protest is difficult to win, I hope Beijing and Tianjin Industrial understanding,tagli di capelli corti, let judgment becomes final reply is concerned. Surin told reporters that prosecutors have been under pressure in the course of the prosecution, defense lawyers and even by intimidation, threats: April 2, 2009 after the end of a trial court, attorney Lee pile prosecutor Li Chunlei (Guang Yang District Procuratorate indictment woman chief ) he said: "you still have time for my soft serve, in the future when state compensation I can give you plead, otherwise I will let you do not prosecutors." after the prosecutors out of court, Lee suddenly pile driving on the sidewalk to hit over , was clerk to stop after stop, then quickly drove away from the scene. & Nbsp; Prosecutor court was hit by a car intimidate lawyers, this is rarely heard in the country. This reporter Li Chunlei privately to understand the situation. Although Li Chunlei expressed reluctance to talk about the matter, but this experience is recognized. The stronger female prosecutor said: "After three years of public prosecution case, to obtain this result, shocking, but helpless." State-owned holding company of questions & nbsp; "Why so arrogant defender? Being the case during the trial, defense counsel in advance to determine how the case will end up doing acquittals need for state compensation? Who is the verdict in the trial is not completed in advance to know in advance and told counsel?" Beijing Jin Industrial questioned one after another. & Nbsp; Finally, once again Surin told reporters that Beijing and Tianjin Industry does not recognize the court's decision,ciocca di capelli, the judgment unclear facts, insufficient evidence and will affect the company's next stage of development. Currently, some shareholders emotional, may affect social stability. Beijing-Tianjin Industry will continue to use legal means to protect their own interests,because the suspect Zhang Xio, to protect state-owned assets are not misappropriated.

DavidCadogan.ca Forums Topic: This disorder in the court

dfnjiof6t on "This disorder in the court"