Provide another way for Xia Junfeng's defense lawyers in recent days to see some decision support people comes a question, is Xia Junfeng there is no evidence they are justifiable defense, but the reality is that two people created in his hand. Yes, this way of thinking, but to apply the usual event, suitable for special event would be a problem. We might as well from the "evil law is illegal" (posted in the US) to consider: people usually think in "I carried out the orders of his superiors I is no crime, the crime on it", people think that this kind of thinking is correct, so the unconditional implementation of the orders. If we turn to think about: "what kind of method should you perform?" This shift is different. Similarly, people used to think of "who stated, who bears the burden of proof", this is true in general, the equality of conditions, it should be who statement, who bears the burden of proof. However, when one has no right of people is power in a totally impossible to provide evidence that the environment, providing evidence is not weak, but also not weak can provide the,, but should be a party to provide powerful evidence of his innocence. Have a lot of the reverse side teaching material, like hospitals, prisons, reeducation through labor...... (for example: a horse three prison scandal), they control everything, they committed crimes will use "power" and "Mei An" camera camera "bad" and so on slanting reason to defend themselves, in fact,Converse Chaussures, this defense is without any reason, also cannot be used as evidence. In this present everywhere camera era, people are monitoring the P era, the Department has a reason to cover up their crimes are not established. That is to say, if the power side doesn't have that no evidence of the crime,Converse, all the weak say can be used as evidence. This post has been edited in 2013/9/28 8:44:10
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
[original] evidence Xia Junfeng had
(1 post)-
Posted 12 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.