reported « DavidCadogan.ca Forums

DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

reported

(1 post)

Started 10 years ago by nkswhm35636

Tags:

nkswhm35636
Member

Abandoned more than a decade in the Beijing-Tianjin garden villa Core Tip: & nbsp; 2004 August Beijing and Tianjin Development Industrial Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Beijing and Tianjin Industrial), former general manager Wang Xiangning in the outgoing audit found suspected of job occupation of state-owned assets of about 10 million yuan, after the Langfang City, Guang Yang District People's Procuratorate prosecution to the court, after hearing seven times (Ben June 2 has reported, reported, "company executives suspected of job occupation not hearing many of judgment"). June 3, Langfang City, Guang Yang District People's Court of first instance verdict, found four facts constitute Wang Xiangning job occupation are insufficient evidence, so the prosecution alleged offenses can not be established. Wang Xiangning sentenced the accused not guilty. & Nbsp; "It is really baffling verdict! -? A misappropriation of company property, nearly a million people hit by legal acquittal Is that such combat crime and protect state assets" Recently,moncler pas cher, Beijing and Tianjin Industrial agents,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/spark-inc/kit-70wu-h4rl-501.html, deputy general manager of Surin Call Ben, dwell dissatisfaction and doubts on the judgment of the trial proceedings. & Nbsp; Surin told reporters: "Beijing-Tianjin Co. joint-stock companies in 1992 to set up private placement, at present about 70% of the company is directly under SASAC central enterprises hold for such a ruling,air max femme, the company shareholders' does not. promise 'requires us to follow the proceedings continue to fight for our rights "& nbsp..; "Who gave the court the power to press the case without trial" & nbsp; The provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law, the court case of public prosecution shall within one month after accepting the verdict, not later than one and a half; the provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities Higher People's Court approval or decision may be extended by one month; even Procuratorate extension hearing the application, the longest trial period only nine months. & Nbsp; Surin said:. & Nbsp; "case May 8,moncler pas cher, 2007 Prosecutor's Office for prosecution, the trial should have been completed according to legal procedures, but Guang Yang District Court of First Instance which lasted more than two years, the case turned out to be the first trial in July 2007 May 11, this time has been more than a half of the people's court jurisdiction limits longest, but without hearing the case,louboutin homme, is not eligible for an extension to the High Court and the People's Procuratorate has no right to apply for an extension trial. That is, the case In the first trial had been illegal,http://www.weipengyou.net/home.php?mod=space&uid=378, the prosecution to trial within this time, Guang Yang District People's Court in doing who gives them the power to press the case without trial & nbsp??; Against the judgment of the & nbsp; "on the case to the higher court hospital for a consult," Surin think, "Even if there really need to consult the problem, the superior court should be completed within the statutory jurisdiction limits reply I did not see which law. the provisions of the lower court asked the report on the work between the statutory reason to extend trial periods of "& nbsp.; "Who gave the court the power to hear the case again" & nbsp; In accordance with the "Code of Criminal Procedure" provisions, the prosecution case through the courts should be reviewed after the verdict. And case in August 9, 2007 has completed the trial, Wang Xiangning I also made a final statement in court, however, the courts have been slow to sentencing law. Since Guang Yang district court jurisdiction limits seriously overdue, a direct result of Wang Xiangning was released on bail. & Nbsp; October 28, 2008,http://webquest.infoespacio.net/spip.php?article17, Guang Yang District People's Court in the absence of any justification and the reopening of the case on the grounds that "Procuratorate add new evidence." Since Guang Yang District People's Court decided to reopen the case, resulting in Wang Xiangning and his defenders retracted in court on multiple charges of public prosecution against supplement their vulnerability. & Nbsp; May 21, 2009 the last trial, Wang Xiangning again for a prosecutor to testify add the appropriate file, and lead around the contradictory evidence and the defense. & Nbsp; Surin told reporters: "In the case set aside the process, Wang Xiangning and their attorney to move around, to obstruct the case according to law and fair trial, and the use of their personal property holding company, the real reason for the rapid transfer of the case dragged on it.!" & Nbsp ; The performance of the courts of such disorders, several head of Beijing and Tianjin Industrial's really do not understand: "First, regardless of the case at this time has exceeded the statutory jurisdiction limits, if not exceed, the new evidence should only be cross-examined evidence, without The case should be re-hearing who Guang Yang District People's Court to grant the right to re-trial of the case "& nbsp.?; "Verdict: guilty of evidence adopted by all who have made acquittal" & nbsp; ! "Verdict is simply incomprehensible" Surin proposed several questions for the verdict: & nbsp; First, a lot of guilt evidence provided by the prosecutor in court, but was not listed in the verdict, naturally without the full court of review. In China, the law expressly provides that: all the evidence on cross-examination must be reviewed by the court, Guang Yang District People's Court why the only evidence of guilt reviewed, their real intention is to what? & Nbsp; Second, the trial record without appearing before the Beijing-Tianjin Industrial By reading confirms that, as a basis for decisions. Violation of the "Code of Criminal Procedure" provisions. Why court court records to hide? Such records also the credibility of it? As the basis for a judgment can be reassuring it? & Nbsp; Third,http://cutyayu.sakura.ne.jp/cabbs/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=120&page=%25,woolrich outlet, the verdict did not make any arbitrary reasoning on the conclusions of the defendant not guilty. Case the Supreme Court has been advocating enhanced verdict that reason, and even in the case of the judgment of the evidence the prosecutor presented all be adopted, without any analytical reasoning, but made the guilty verdict. Adopted all the evidence of guilt, nor refuted acquittal, acquittal why make it? & Nbsp; "What is leadership satisfactory reply" & nbsp; Wang Xiangning defense lawyer Li pile repeatedly claimed in court: "I Hebei provincial leadership office, talk to the principal leaders of the provincial party committee the case, the provincial party committee and the Politics and Law Committee leadership's attitude is very clear, we agree with the views expressed, and has issued Politics and Law Committee indicated to the Langfang "Beijing-Tianjin Co. official said:." We do not believe a defense lawyer Li Zhuang remarks, but what is puzzling is that after be prosecuted,http://www.youzhiyin66.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=24295, Langfang Municipal Committee has repeatedly called Langfang public prosecutor, three scheduling of the case on the grounds that 'superiors say in this case' for a trial period dragged "& nbsp..; Judge to delay the case from hasty judgment, court staff person in charge of Beijing and Tianjin Industrial speaking: "Recently a secretary of the Hebei Provincial came in person to Langfang, asked us before he left Langfang case would give him a satisfactory reply. "Surin said he does not understand what is leading a satisfactory answer. & Nbsp; "Procuratorate pressure" Throughout the trial of the case, the prosecution has a distinct attitude against the defendant Wang Xiangning constitute a crime. The prosecutor's indictment last opinion is that the facts are clear, there is ample evidence, the defendant constitute a crime. & Nbsp; After the guilty verdict issued by the Beijing-Tianjin Co., filed complaints to the prosecution application, Guang Yang District Prosecutor's Office also drew protest to higher offices. But now, from the time the verdict has been over two months, the first instance verdict in force. Surin told reporters, relevant sources said that even if the protest is difficult to win, I hope Beijing and Tianjin Industrial understanding, let judgment becomes final reply is concerned. Surin told reporters that prosecutors have been a lot of pressure in the prosecution process, even by defense lawyers intimidated, threatened: April 2,http://7pf.hk/albums/displayimage.php?pid=3893&page=10, 2009, after hearing the end of the hearing, counsel for the prosecutor pile Li Li Chunlei (Guang Yang District Procuratorate indictment woman chief ) said: "You still have time for my soft serve, in the future when state compensation I can give you plead, otherwise I will let you do not prosecutors." out of court after the public prosecutor, Lee suddenly pile driving on the sidewalk to hit over , the clerk stop after stop, then quickly left the scene by car. & Nbsp; Prosecutors court was hit by a car intimidate lawyers, this is rarely heard in the country. This reporter Li Chunlei privately to understand the situation. Li Chunlei, while expressing reluctance about the matter, but this experience is recognized. The stronger female prosecutor said: "This case after three years of prosecution, to get this result, shocking, but helpless." State-owned holding company of questions & nbsp; "Why so arrogant defender? The case is a trial, the defense counsel in advance to determine how the case will end up doing acquittals need for state compensation? Who is the verdict in the trial of unfinished advance to know in advance and told counsel?" Beijing Tianjin Industrial question of succession. & Nbsp; Finally, again Surin told reporters that Beijing and Tianjin Industry does not recognize the court's decision,http://d-ura.info, the judgment unclear facts, insufficient evidence and will affect the company's next stage of development. Currently, some shareholders emotional that may affect social stability. Beijing and Tianjin Co. will continue to use legal means to protect their own interests,http://www.pg666.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=310690, to protect state-owned assets are not misappropriated. 

Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.