<br>Ms. Qi after restaurant employees and company labor relations, not out hostel. Two days later, she was liquefied petroleum gas leak caused by deflagration in the bath,air max 90 outlet, she was severely burned. She will be the company to court,http://birthome.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=488274, claims 37 million yuan, the Court of First Instance sentenced awarded 30 million yuan. The company refused to accept the appeal,http://www.buchiyama.com, the case yesterday in the City Intermediate People's court of second instance.<br> <br>Ms. Qi claimed that: May 2,piumini moncler outlet, 2008, she entered the Nanshan District, a Seafood restaurant tea any member. During her service, the restaurant has been living in staff quarters, the same year on May 30,peuterey outlet,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/frogberry/won065.html, the restaurant due to poor management,http://www.88822.com/#03666/read.php?tid=980, then lifted the labor relations with her. She was allowed to continue living in the dormitory, until re-find a job.<br> <br>In the same year at 17:30 on June 1, Ms. Qi ready to shower in the dormitory,air max pas cher, the landlord lived on the south side because 301 toilet liquefied petroleum gas cylinders connected to one of the hose is not connected, the leakage of liquefied petroleum gas in case of fire caused by deflagration cause she was severely burned. The hospital diagnosis: her body multiple burns Ⅱ ° -Ⅲ ° 85% (especially severe), and the body was badly disfigured face. By Shenzhen Second People's Hospital forensic clinical forensic identification, Ms. Qi has been assessed to seven disability.<br> <br>After the incident, Ms. Qi the restaurant's original corporate and operators Leung, now an investment operators Group Limited, an asset management Limited to court, requesting the court to order the defendant to pay Ms. Qi three medical expenses, transportation , care, food subsidies, lost income, disability compensation, mental solatium total of 37 million yuan.<br> <br>Nanshan District Court of First Instance that, May 2, 2008, the former restaurant operator Leung and an investment company,http://jrecin.jst.go.jp, a management company to terminate the contract negotiations, and on the same day signed a "transfer of the book" and handed over a list of items,moncler femme pas cher, and water, electricity, List of gas settlement. Ms. Qi official work is May 3, 2008, the actual restaurant managers involved an investment company and a management company. Proof issued by the police also confirmed that the accident occurred when the fire Ms. Qi live in housing is an investment company's staff quarters. So Leung nothing to do with the case.<br> <br>The hospital was made verdict: an investment company, a management company should compensate Ms. Qi medical expenses, care,http://www.cecyteo.edu.mx/site/index.php, food subsidies,http://www.e-tud.com, lost income,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/waiwai/lwa-m141d-4ajf.html, disability compensation, mental damages totaling 30 million yuan.<br> <br>The company first instance verdict against two defendants, appealed to the City Intermediate People's Court.<br> <br>The two companies believe that the incident was not the company's dormitory staff quarters, it is Mr Leung lease. Ms. Qi labor contract between the company and has ended, the company has no obligation to miss any liability for injuries suffered aligned. Ms. Qi hurt place is in a residential area, does not meet the compensation or compensation according to the conditions of labor relations.<br> <br>In addition, Ms. Qi also exist negligent fault. Its deal with all the responsibilities. The company is given for humanitarian Ms. Qi 10,000 yuan compensation.<br> <br>Ms. Qi and his lawyer that, although she and the two companies have lifted the labor contract, but the restaurant dormitory administrator agreed to be laid off staff in the hostel a few days before, until the move to find work again, this is reasonable. Poor management of the company dormitory security, LPG leak causes explosion, so she suffered serious injuries, should bear the liability.<br> <br>After hearing the judge presided over the mediation. Company lawyer expressed intention of mediation, but did not put forward specific proposals.<br> <br>Currently, the case is still under further investigation.<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
lost income
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.