<br>(Reporter Zhang Yuan) Five years ago, Songzhuang artist Wanghong Zheng please shoot nude mannequins,doudoune moncler pas cher, and create paintings based on photographs. Model hear painting to be auctioned,http://maximum.room.ne.jp/bbs/yami/yybbs.cgi/http:/yybbs??U?��??I?, the prosecution claims 500,air max femme pas cher,000.<br> <br>Recently, Xiangtan Yuhu District Court trial of a painter compensate 300,000, the present case has entered the second instance.<br> <br>Now a teacher prosecuted model<br> <br>It triggered the lawsuit is a series of works called "dust",http://hyper5.amuser.net/~youknow/limelight/kobato/bbs6/custombbs.cgi/DRPldiZFBkMRs/, the Department of painter Wanghong Zheng creation, and was invited to participate in the China Millennium Monument's "Ninth School" First Oil Painting Exhibition.<br> <br>Plaintiff Xiaomei (a pseudonym) is now a teacher. She claims that in early 2011 to hear friends, colleagues and talking to her parents, she learned to themselves as the prototype of nude painting in a number of exhibitions and magazines published and a public auction in the market.<br> <br>Xiaomei believes that this act against his own portrait, reputation and privacy, requiring immediate painter Wanghong Zheng newspaper apology and compensation of 500,000 yuan.<br> <br>Proceedings,http://cgi.waka.h.mepage.jp, Xiaomei also invited two witnesses confirmed that after painting was published, Xiaomei many colleagues,moncler femme, parents evaluation of her very bad, that its "behavior" and the teacher of the people's identity disproportionate.<br> <br>Model had to pay 2000 yuan<br> <br>Yesterday afternoon, still appeal to everyone's attention on the matter on microblogging.<br> <br>He said that in 2007 the creation of this group of works Shihai in graduate school. Then through a friend, models and other selected human models,http://chuanzhang.hkhost54.asia/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=73726&extra=, eventually chose three people (Xiaomei is one of them) as a reference prototype.<br> <br> said that, since "we all know", "as a painter is very emotional" and did not enter into an agreement between him and Xiaomei was, simply took a group of nude photos. After he paid about 2,000 yuan, Xiaomei left.<br> <br>He said that was "out of anger" when it receives a court summons, "like a stealth bomb."<br> <br>A trial painter pay 300,000<br> <br>For this case,http://www.fufufu.tv, Xiangtan Yuhu District Court of First Instance that, although the artist considered painting as compared to photo is a greater difference Xiaomei, but also into the charge of the works to create, but the evidence provided Xiaomei has been able to prove its own portrait painting consistency,http://www.democratie-socialisme.org/spip.php?article3523, it is "copying paintings" and therefore a violation of portrait rights.<br> <br>In addition, the court found naked Xiaomei belong to their privacy, painter on unauthorized leave without permission constitutes infringement, but also to undermine his "teacher of the people" a good image, it is also a violation of privacy and reputation.<br> <br>According to the court painting public auction price was 24 million yuan, the defendant published the oil paintings and other circumstances, as appropriate, the amount of compensation 300,000 identified.<br> <br>After the verdict,indian remy hair, Wanghong Zheng appealed, the case will be held on March 30 of second instance.<br> <br>■ similar cases<br> <br>12009, the Chaoyang Court hearing had been a model v Press to discuss the case of the right of portrait sketches, the Court considered other forms of image Portrait sketch of this painting in the form of objectivity, photos and other carriers compared with the original character quite different, He dismissed the claims model.<br> <br>21989 First National Art Museum of China Oil Painting Exhibition human body, after painting the model prosecute organizers that the exhibition and catalog of violation of their image rights and privacy. This case until the late 1990s until the end of the trial, ruled in favor of the plaintiff's legal rights.<br> <br>■ ask<br> <br>Industry practice is what?<br> <br>Professor at the Central Academy of Fine Arts, vice president of urban design, said Wang, international and domestic industry practices are rarely clear sign works with mannequins range, "the most labor protection agreement."<br> <br>He believes that this is not because the arts community awareness of the law behind,louboutin soldes, but their spirit is not the same as economic demands. Wang had contact with some other countries of the former Soviet ballerina, "volunteered to do a model, that is the artist selected is an honor." And in recent years with the prosperity and economic interests of the domestic art market was instantly development was a result of an increase in such cases, so artists by surprise.<br> <br>In the end is not infringed infringement?<br> <br>Law School Dean Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, civil law expert Long Wei ball that,http://juan.linkko.com/node/add/article, even if there is no written agreement, oral agreement is still valid, and infringement on criteria including whether the parties have agreed on the scope of work at the time (which is still on display assignments have no exceptions), if on the face and so were portraying and other circumstances. He believes that, in general, if there is no special agreement shall be deemed to mannequin prototype works created as a public work of art,http://www.infini.fr/spip.php?article47, "art than to protect the right of personality."<br> <br>Interprovincial service is appropriate?<br> <br>According on the microblogging broke the news that one of the reasons he is dissatisfied with the outcome of the case, the judge of first instance courts have to bring people to their studio in Beijing Songzhuang served with a summons, "violent action" so that he suspected investigators have interests involved among them. In this regard, yesterday, the reporter failed to contact the judge to verify.<br> <br>Beijing law firm lawyers believe Yi Shenghua, according to "Civil Law", directly serve litigation documents difficult, may entrust another court on behalf of the delivery or by mail. But the Civil Procedure Law does not prohibit a judge "provinces", "personally" served, in reality, some of the litigants also welcomed this "service", disgusted phone call to get the party summons "take over."<br> Share: welcome to comment I want to comment microblogging Recommended | hot microblogging today<br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
the reporter failed to contact the judge to verify.
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.