but the enemy did more and more « DavidCadogan.ca Forums

DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

but the enemy did more and more

(1 post)

Started 10 years ago by jkajc85542

Tags:

jkajc85542
Member

 Wen _ the correspondents & nbsp; & nbsp; Zeng Hui & nbsp; & nbsp; from Beijing Fang being in transgenic looked "science" when an unexpected person - cui stand out detonated war. Since "Fang Yuan" pinch frame, from genetically to the Foundation, from the network to the courtroom, the two sides exchanged fire efforts at all levels. This time, he was not to challenge others, but opponents to Sike. "Cui to ruin my reputation." Honest Outlook: Cui you sue, claim 300,000 yuan. From the announcement to put into practice, the process is very fast. Fang: I said, then it will be honored, let alone after I declared him but intensified. 300,000 yuan is not wild speculation, which can be considered common price for defamation lawsuit, (claims) high court will not support, would not achieve the punishment for his role too. I do not agree with the so-called "one-dollar lawsuit," it does not make sense. The evidence is obvious, as long as the court fair trial, I have no problem winning. Honest Outlook: You accuse cui rumors, slander, can you say the same when the online response to some "outrageous", then how can it count? Fang: disinformation, defamation of thing is not a sentence or two, he called me from beginning to end in the "elbow", "disgusting liar", "cult leader", "Hitler" and so on, as long as some people say bad things about me on the Internet He will be forwarded. Have claimed that I spent $ 680,000 to buy a house in the United States, he would be forwarded to say "the money is lying to." This is not the usual ridicule and irony, his subjective intention is very obvious, just want to discredit me, ruin my reputation. I also had to fight back, but but are factual, but also he is a first-name basis, there has been no personal attacks. I'm just the right sense of proportion in this, it's not in order to avoid legal risks, but that is not necessary. Honest Outlook: There withdrawal possible? Fang: If his apology, and the spirit is willing to pay compensation, I certainly can not litigate. But he has put it, that we must press down on me, I can only fight in the end. Honest Outlook: now on "Fang Yuan war of words," the topic is beyond the scope of the transgene. This will allow people but lost to GM issues concern itself? Fang: I think the outside world, "war of words" is biased. Cui provoked the whole thing is, he knows the issue of genetically modified fight with me is of himself, he began to discredit me. Throughout all he scolded me one, I gave him back a block, there is no initiative from provocation. This topic between me and him could have marginalized, but does not mean the debate on GM will stop here, there are still many people in academic circles for its "name." Even if I and his lawsuit was over, I am afraid (transgenic) will fight it. Honest Outlook: Why did you quite genetically? Fang: 1996 Americans began to cultivate genetically modified products, then I'm still the United States, it has been contacted, know that it is safe and can be promoted. The mainstream view is that biologists agree that the scientific community most people is "quite turn". Of course, there are very few people who engage in physical in "reverse",nike air max 90, but they do not understand biology. Honest Outlook: But in this debate, Cui investigator plays a role, but you have been standing preaching position. Some people say "no investigation, no right to speak",http://classetice.fr/spip.php?article266, how do you see? Fang: cui to the United States to do the survey, known as spent 500,000, but that is totally funny. He thought go to the supermarket and see, go and ask the farmer to do to understand the genetically modified? He himself does not know English, holding a bag of stuff written GMO-free, but do not know, adding that "in this supermarket to see things that are not labeled if they contain genetically modified ingredients." When to cui assistant, is pushing the "water to oil" of Chen Yiwen,http://www.acoh-re.jp/post_mail/postmail.cgi, deliberately does not necessarily translate to blind him. I certainly have the investigation. Transgenic final analysis of biological knowledge, I understand how it works. I was still online access to a document of the US State Department, found that they did in large-scale cultivation of genetically modified products and food. Honest Outlook: You used to say, "not the person", if the matter aside, how would you rate on Cui? Fang: I and the number of dealings with him much. In the past he did "tell the truth", the invitation I went to two shows, which aired the one, the other is pinched off the stage. Another time, there is a site to do a survey, 90 percent supported me, Cui turn on the microblogging this result, he said "I'm the one." At that time I told him a good impression,http://zazna.com/selection/index.php?item/create_form/1, that he is a man seeking truth, dare to sound science. But then I realized that maybe just his appearance. Cui do not understand the real science, but also to defend unscrupulous error. Now he has gone to the extreme, even quit work,http://www.yuyuwang.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1174198, single-minded to deal with me. I'm not interested in how high Han Honest Outlook: You seem to have a selective crackdown, based on what you choose when you consider? Fang: I do not have anti-counterfeiting team, I have always been a person, so it does not have so much energy to take into account all aspects of the matter. I take the initiative to play, in general, have a certain academic content,http://www.88822.com/#87788/read.php?tid=980, others will not fight. Another one, I try to choose some relatively large influence, misleading and may cause more serious harm to public figures. Such as playing academic fraud, I would focus on a number of academicians, well-known professors, teachers and students of the ordinary I do not want to control. Also, I am not like to join in the fun, like the Red Cross, cooking oil this topic, there are many professionals involved in long ago,http://www.wifigx.com/forum.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, and things are clear, I will not have to come forward. Honest Outlook: Who can appear to be normalizing you play who is to hype yourself? Fang: In fact, by my fake people,piumini woolrich outlet, many just happen to hit the muzzle it. Such as Han, when he declared war Catcher forward, at first I did not care, then there are a lot of people! I am only concerned about this matter, he puts his work pulls out of view again. Whether or not I take the initiative to fight, and if they find this person really a problem, I will expose. For example, Jimmy Lin, also the friends told me that he was a product endorsement, let me see. I see, is not that just played collagen before it? So for him, of course, will not let go. I know some people say I counterfeiting to hype. Why can no one to emulate it? This shows that it is not a good method known. To be honest, counterfeiting does make me a reputation, but also makes me play more clout. The same problem, others to play and I play, really is quite different. Caltech Albert in "Threads" on the question Jun Tang, no attention. Very occasionally the day, I saw someone asked Tang qualifications microblogging, because I edited the article Albert, it unhesitatingly back saying "education is false", the results lead to big stir, even I I have not thought of. Honest Outlook: No map name, is it profit? Fang: I have artificial rumor that I was the spokesman for US GM companies. I "quite turn", Americans should hate my son. Because I was very Chinese agricultural colleges and two self-developed transgenic varieties, it is to talk to them to come up with the competition. I do not derive benefit penny, if you insist a little economic benefit, at most, I wrote some introductory book transgene resulting royalties. I know that in cui take my "Security Fund" that matter. In this Xu Yu-PRO donate 3 million before me, a total of more than 100 million are spent on all these years for my personal security. The money at the time of establishment, we have declared, not announced details of use. Overheating that took this thing to attack me, then he invited Beijing land tax, the Economic Investigation, vigorously engage in a fan survey have not found any problems. I played so many years of false, do all public acts. Honest Outlook: You have to Han's height inquisitive, but also in the public interest? Fang: It was just policy, I told him I did not in the end how high interest. The reason why throw this question is so obvious in order to prove the things he did not dare to face correctly described the man lying by nature. Honest Outlook: You have played false in various fields. Do you think with their knowledge, be able to support such a broad question it? Fang: This is really a contradiction. I questioned a little, someone said I was selective; more question, and that I was in charge too wide. In general, when I counterfeiting very cautious, like something scientific,hogan outlet donna, I have basic literacy, but still do not know to ask more professional friends, sometimes enthusiastic users to help provide clues, I will carefully verify. Not all industries are in need of professional knowledge to false identification. Like you said on plagiarism and academic literature, I put two articles were compared and found a whole section to repeat, which at a glance. "I put a horse Chengpeng" Honest Outlook: With so many people debate over, who do you think you can be called a real opponent? Fang: say "rival", then, strictly speaking, they are wrong, no way to challenge me. But some people can see the situation, like Kai-fu Lee, Xianshibumiao quickly apologize, I will no longer be held. Li Chengpeng also apologized, although the lack of sincerity, but I still put him on a horse, he is very clever. Honest Outlook: You can not go wrong when? Others questioned the taste you feel better? Fang: I certainly made some small mistakes,moncler soldes, in the writing,woolrich sito ufficiale, or the fact that there have been some clerical error, but not with the subjective bad faith, be regarded as flaws it found that even after all soon corrected. The biggest mistake is to confuse the fake objects - two people of the same name, and the same year at the same university. Fortunately, one hour later I discovered the problem, immediately delete it, and also made an apology. Overall, those who question me, find any mishap. Honest Outlook: fewer and fewer people have not found support for you? Fang: I do not think fewer supporters, but the enemy did more and more, because you hit a person, actually offend gang. Of course, there are some people lost, we call that "front powder", these people now call me all day posting, became the most authentic "black square." In fact, they supported me when already mixed with personal purposes, or to my understanding is superficial. Really understand the science of man is not going to leave me. Honest Outlook: You are Dr. biology, why the crackdown as a career, rather than engage in academic, to do research? Fang: I do is science, writing articles, do site, counterfeiting is only one part. I think the Chinese do science more meaningful than engage in scientific research, if I really engage in research, scientific research may be just an ordinary person, this country does not lack talent. Science not only to popularize scientific knowledge, but it is important to spread the spirit of science and the scientific method. I was a no unit, not involved who can be independent to do these things, I do not expect people to like me. Honest Outlook: So you think the lack of scientific spirit of Chinese society? Fang: in China, talking about weak science environment. Our emphasis is on traditional culture moderation, not seriously, which is a natural antagonism scientific spirit. Two years ago, China Science and Technology Association of data that only three percent of people have the scientific literacy level of the West 20 years ago, I think this data may have been posted gold. Talking about science, the first is to speak up. I have worked with Professor Crick, his professionalism, let me admire. Scientists like China are rare, it has died Zou Chenglu should count as one. He is known as the "fake fighters", Pente shelling, endless. His battle over legal circles He Weifang, literary Han, Zhong Nanshan Overheating, the medical profession business community ...... Recently, he and Cui wrangling. He is Fang. In his report to the court on the day, and Honest Outlook for reporters in Beijing he conducted an exclusive interview with him. [Interview Notes] walked Fang from leasing office, to which he appeared ten minutes, the reporters have been thinking, how to follow the "old world" in his opening remarks. According to media presentation look past the point of view, I interviewed a man emotionally intense, Cheng Yong aggressive. Outside suddenly heard rapid footsteps. A face with a tired, tall and thin men just a door, then held out his hand to say hello. A closer look, it is not exactly Fang? Taking advantage of warming awkward greeting, reporters straight into the subject. We talked from the "Fang Yuan Wars", "fake fighter,http://www.lqwhg.com/Review.asp?NewsID=54," talk from transgenic to cognitive science, I have been careful to "beware" of his expression of Sharp, but he did not enraptured from start to finish, nor generous remarks, but politely patiently talking about all topics. Reporters tried to give him a "prick", and asked him fake motives, and asked him to be argumentative mood. Surprisingly, the face of these tricky issues, he does not shy away, unhurried to answer. Reporters feel that I have to face this Fang very normal, not radical, nor crazy,http://www.51yam.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, while he had a recognized for his dedication, or stubborn. About crackdown, maybe he does have some of the reasons for the heart is still hidden, perhaps he has not the right place to judge. But in the community, "false" too much, too few people dare to speak out bluntly, his maverick is even more valuable. Fang also because of those eyes, a public figure was more discipline, more "be careful." Fang crackdown, love grabbing hold problem will naturally be offended many people. But our opinion, Yung had so many "false", can not tolerate a truth-seeking people? (Edit: SN086) 

Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.