<p>Zhang liked the female leader of a company in Beijing, after the confession but was rejected each other repeatedly. Since then, Zhang has four times to the front of the company's trouble,barbour catalogue, smashed the company access attendance,barbour soldes, but just to attract the female leader of "concern." Recently,nike running, the Beijing Intermediate People's Court on the admissibility of the three together so because of emotional problems and intentional destruction of property in the second trial of criminal cases. Accused of repeatedly smashed belongings According to the prosecutor accused the defendant Zhang in between August 2014 to September, due to personal emotional problems.</p>
<p> four to the front of a building company in Beijing smashed a company access attendance,barbour paris, after Zhang was seized and brought to justice. Public Prosecution that the defendant Zhang's behavior constituted the crime of intentional destruction of property,http://www.balunya.com/news/html/?251330.html,veste moncler homme occasion, it shall be held criminally responsible. During the first trial, defendant Zhang facts to the prosecutor accused of no objection, but argued that its conduct,louboutin femme, administrative offense, not a crime. It was during bail,barbour france, Zhang also ignore the court warned that the victim once again to destroy the company implemented fiscal behavior. Court of First Instance by the trial,http://cand.qee.jp/link_p/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=viewres&target/, the defendant is found Zhang guilty of intentional destruction of property and sentenced to detention for four months. After the first instance verdict against the defendant Zhang refused to accept the three Court of Appeal. He argued that want to attract attention III Court upheld the hearing that the defendant Zhang and a legal representative Lee Department of classmates. Zhang since 2013 began to pursue Lee,http://1973523.info/cgi/warp/apeboard_plus.cgi//”/,scarpin louboutin pas cher, but Lee has been on Zhang explicitly rejected. Zhang then began to SMS, email,louboutin france, etc. harassment intercept Lee,http://www.wifigx.com/forum.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, which makes Lee miserable. Trial, Zhang argued: "Because she is the legal representative of the company, I deliberately destroyed the company access attendance is to attract her attention, and I know their actions illegal, but in order to give me a she clear answer,http://x.mamiclub.org/home.php?mod=space&uid=1396664, I can only do that. " During the second trial, Zhang still think their actions did not result in serious consequences.</p>
<p> the circumstances are obviously minor,abercrombie, did not meet standards conviction does not constitute a crime. Three in hospital after hearing that the Court of First Instance on the facts appellant Zhang crime,giubbotti woolrich, the nature of the crime, the circumstances and the degree of harm to society for the decision made,scarpe nike, the facts are clear,abercrombie soldes, the conviction and the applicable law is correct,http://www.infocrystal.com/alink/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=10/, appropriate sentencing,nobis jackets,http://jade1.cn/news/html/?20730.html, the final three in the hospital Zhang rejected the appeal,http://www.xilaileqp7.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=51652,air jordan pas cher, upheld the final ruling made. According to the contractor case the judge trader Gordon Yu introduced, according to the Supreme Procuratorate,jordan 5 retro, Ministry of Public Security "on the public security organs under the jurisdiction of the criminal prosecution standard filing requirements (a)" provides more than three times the destruction of public or private property, it should be placed on file prosecution. "Personal feelings of this regulation is not the object of the law,toms outlet, but if things made with feelings,comprar air max baratas, certainly when it comes to the law will face punishment." Suppliers Teng Yu said the case of the defendant Zhang insisted that the pursuit of feeling perfectly justified.</p>