but the latter has not to be returned « DavidCadogan.ca Forums

DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

but the latter has not to be returned

(1 post)

Started 10 years ago by bg5nS0aA1S

Tags:

bg5nS0aA1S
Member

 Southern Rural News reported, "the lawsuit played so many years, we won twice, but still can not get ownership of two pieces of land." April 24, the northern slope of the town of Zhanjiang Suixi village frame frame Tian Tian order Order Tsai Village group of villagers Li Yang holding court verdict said. Li Yang said the two fields located in the frame to make Tsai Village, rack Luo Wancun east,nike air max pas cher, an area of about 28 acres, is the holder Tin Tsai village groups and make Suixi County Forest Experiment years of controversy woodland. Is borrowed is to give? Land ownership and uncompromising After the founding of the disputed forest land belongs wasteland. November 22, 1959, state-run farms and plains of North County recorded under mine field make people's commune brigade frame (frame field that is now to make the village) signed a "deal with land rights agreement", containing the disputed land, including 4735 Plain acres of land allocated to the state farm management and use. After the state plains state farms incorporated Qianjin Farm. August 1, 1963, forward farm and Suixi County Forestry Bureau signed a "breakout Long live the plains on the receiver housing land transfer book", agreed to the above-mentioned 4735 acres of land, 165 square meters houses handed over to Suixi Forestry rack Tian order nursery farm management, the same month on the 15th to complete the handover. Thereafter, the test site by the Suixi forestry nursery management frame fields to make use of. Accordingly, Suixi County Forest Experiment Station believes that the land in dispute all to himself. But stand Tin Tsai village group thinks so, the land in dispute was only lent Suixi County Forest Experiment Station Nursery management frame fields make use, land ownership is still vested in the village all. A written March 12, 1959, stamped with "Suixi County Forest Experiment Station," the official seal of IOU villagers show: "In order to greening the motherland,http://www.xbyhr.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=21412, seedling production and other needs, is to make the frame Tin Tsai Village, by a land parcel , place names: Large groups ridge, high village Chai Ling, wild boar quiet east ridge, you stand Tin Tsai Village masses when you want to make, I returned to the nursery to (what) is. " The villagers said that since 1972, they repeatedly asked Suixi County Forest Experiment Station Nursery frame field to make restitution, but the latter has not to be returned, "1977, 1978, aircraft Tian Tian order nursery field and frame make Aberdeen Village also in respect of the land dispute had been consulted. " However, in 1982,http://www.menqiu.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, Suixi Suixi County People's Government to make Forest Experiment Station Nursery frame Field No. 0,005,256 issued a "Suixi forest warrants," said the dispute to the first ridge with a large group of names registered in the permit third column. 1992, Suixi Suixi County People's Government gave Forest Experiment Station awarded including the above plots, including "then the country with the word [1992]" No. "state-owned land use right certificates." Illegal procedure State-owned land certificate is revoked In 2006, aircraft Tin Tsai village groups so dissatisfied Suixi Suixi County People's Government to issue administrative acts Forest Experiment Station, "state-owned land use right certificates," the administrative proceedings to Suixi County People's Court, requesting revocation of the certificate. Suixi County People's Court that Suixi County People's Government awarded to Suixi Forest Experiment Station of the "state-owned land use right" without the announcement, certification procedures illegal. October 17, 2006, Suixi County People's Court "at the beginning (2006), then French Line No. 25" executive judgment,air max femme,http://www.kkr-nagoya.jp, withdrew "then the country with the word [1992] No." "state-owned land use right certificate." May 18, 2007, aircraft Tin Tsai village groups make mention again Suixi County People's Court administrative proceedings, requesting an order Suixi county government land in dispute shall be given the right to do. Suixi County People's Court on June 12 that year to make "(2007), Law No. 16 then line early word" executive judgment, judgment Suixi County People's Government decision to take effect in 60 days, to stand Tin Tsai Village make land tenure indeed the right decision to deal with the application. However, until August 25, 2011, Suixi County People's Government before making a "town on the northern slope of Suixi village frame field order, so Tsai Tian rack villagers group, rack Luo Wancun people group with Suixi Forestry Research field controversy woodland decision "(hereinafter" the decision "), confirmed two controversial land owned by the state, using all ownership Suixi Forest Experiment Station. For Suixi County People's Government to make the above-mentioned "decision" to make shelf Tin Tsai village group pleaded, administrative proceedings Zhanjiang City Intermediate People's Court. March 22, 2012,http://findplan2.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1700530, Zhanjiang City Intermediate People's Court ruled that the jurisdiction of the Lianjiang City People's Court for trial. May 8, 2012, Lianjiang City People's Court "(2012) William Law No. 7 line early word" executive decision, maintaining Suixi County People's Government to make "decision" on August 25, 2011 Administrative behavior . Subsequently, the frame field so that young group of villagers appealed to the Intermediate People's Court of Zhanjiang City. September 13, 2012, Zhanjiang Intermediate People's Court made "(2012) and France row Cham final word No. 101" Final verdict: First, remove Lianjiang City People's Court (2012) No. 4 line early word inexpensive method, first the 7th administrative decision; second, the revocation of the appellant Suixi County People's Government on August 25, 2011 to make "on the northern slope of Suixi County town village frame field order, so Tsai Tian frame of villagers, the people stand Panel and Suixi Forest Experiment Station controversial decision woodland "specific administrative act, limit appellee Suixi County People's Government to re-specific administrative act. White sue sue? County before determining ownership Although once again won the case, but the rack Tin Tsai village still so happy. Some villagers said that as the disputed land is indeed the right power in the hands of the county government, "when the government will give Woodland land ownership dispute, we can only seek legal means, but the court was unable to land the right to do directly We even Gao Ying,moncler pas cher, the best result is indeed the right to re-sentence the county; and when the government will once again land is indeed the right to forest, farmers and had to seek legal remedies "Some villagers worry, so the cycle, they are. rights is already caught in a bandy among "so that we may never have to not return land, but only in vain to catch the time and money." In this regard, Suixi forest dispute mediation Office Yechun said that to solve forest rights dispute is indeed a long process. Under the current laws, the villagers made by the Government if the forest is indeed the right decision made,http://sportsfan.jpn.org/cgi-kban/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=174&page=1, may apply for administrative reconsideration, such as the re dissatisfied may file an administrative lawsuit to the people's court, "If the court decision the government needs to make a new administrative act, the government will be under dispute new evidence raised by the further verification. "" Like shelf Order Tian Chai village groups and Suixi County Forest Experiment Station this age-old forest rights dispute verification takes a long time, some eight or ten years forest rights dispute can not be resolved. "Yechun said. For villagers said,moncler femme, "do the right land power in the hands of Suixi County People's Government, they want to determine who will determine to whom to give," saying, Ye Chun has denied. He said that due to the controversy involving woodland located in Suixi County jurisdiction,http://karua.at.webry.info, according to the "Guangdong Province forest forest land ownership dispute mediation approach" Article: "Governments at all levels responsible for the administrative areas of the law mediate disputes on forest property" "Power to the frame so that Tsai Tian village groups and Suixi County Forest Experiment Station land ownership dispute indeed Suixi County People's Government in the hands, but certainly do not want to give whoever is indeed correct to whom, are carried out according to the law. " ■ Editor Suixi county may wish to "avoid arousing suspicion." In a sense, the Suixi county government to come forward to make mediation shelf Tian Chai village groups and the county Forest Experiment Station of woodland and determining land ownership disputes, more like a "athlete and when the referee," the bizarre game. Whatever Results are difficult to eliminate onlookers booed. Because 30 years ago, it Suixi county forest land is indeed the right to refer a dispute to the Suixi County Forest Experiment Station; 30 years later, although often lost in the administrative proceedings, but let Suixi county government revoked what they have awarded out that Zhang Shanlin warrants, easier said than done. The reason does not lie in whether there is self-denial Suixi county courage and wisdom, and more importantly, the dispute mediation process,http://wx.jazzsynth.com/wxcgi/kizai/sunkizai.cgi?mode=form&no=43&page=2, Suixi county government has been very difficult solitude independent, impartial third party can become a mallet tuning of . The so-called third party, should be the event itself has no interest, no interest in the subject demands. On the surface,http://www.mmjp.or.jp/p-box/contact, Suixi County can indeed take on such a role, but its premise without notice, on to Suixi County Forest Experiment Station, including the controversial issue of land including the "state-owned land use right certificates," has its ability to allow people to uphold the position in this dispute mediation from the mountains, and had doubts. This kind of "deficiencies", and has been strengthened in the current dispute mediation mechanism in the mountains. Since the forest dispute mediation is considered an administrative function, although farmers may rival in the county court, but disputed land ownership rights firmly determine reality in the hands of the county, so that the villagers efforts ultimately embarrassing predicament . It should be said, in this were the case, whether it is the court,louboutin femme, or the government, are in their duties, no one has crossed the line, but why farmers still clinging walking in the road rights? Have to say, the role of dislocation forest dispute mediation body is one of the root causes. Just Suixi county government in this matter is difficult to get rid of stakeholders, regardless of their dispute mediation to decide how to make the evidence, it is difficult for farmers convinced. In view of this, in the future forest dispute mediation, we can try to land ownership by the special powers of arbitration or on a people's government. After rationalize the procedural issues, the forest fair mediation of disputes before they have the basic logic of the premise. 

Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.