<br>Hua Daily News (reporter Ji Jing Hua Fan intern) Two young men know soon after the registration of marriage, during preparations for the wedding, the two sides because of a trivial trouble collapse, eventually playing divorce. It requires the return of the man the woman married bride and some expensive jewelry purchased and a total of about 15 million. Yanta District Court recently divorce judgment, and the judgment to return the man part of the woman and the man to the woman bride price money mortgage and credit card payments totaling $ 50,000.<br> <br>Marriage registration week, the two sides canceled because of a trivial conflict wedding<br> <br>Wei Qiang (pseudonym) and Huang (a pseudonym) was introduced in March 2014 met. During the two exchanges, Wei Qiang's father to its name there are 100,http://www.hacosuke.com/hacobbs/hacobbs.cgi,000 yuan a bank card to a little yellow. Since then, Wei Qiang and Huang used the card several times spending cash, including setting banquet,http://www.wifigx.com/forum.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, purchase home and so on. In addition, Wei Qiang also small yellow repay mortgages and credit card debt four months a total of 10,000 yuan.<br> <br>Both September 24,http://www.postyourflasher.com, 2014 registration of marriage. In the same year on October 1,moncler soldes, the two sides during the preparations for the wedding because of a trivial conflict,http://www.sangmacollege.com/forum/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2739386&fromuid=30167, for which canceled the wedding. After several rounds of consultations,http://bbs.yioyou.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=6923&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=234280, but there are differences on returning betrothal gifts items. Eventually forcing Xiao Huang Wei taken to court to require the return of bride price Xiao Huang 100,000 yuan in cash for the purchase of expensive jewelry and more than 30,000 yuan, and the plaintiff to the defendant to repay mortgages and credit cards 10,000 yuan, a total of about 150,000 yuan . Yanta court accepted the case.<br> <br>The Court found that the plaintiff and defendant both parties during the exchanges as well as the registration of marriage,http://harako.qee.jp,canada goose pas cher, once used Wei strong consumer has his father's bank card, cash several times, the card have remaining 10,465.45 yuan. The Court also identified the plaintiff gave the defendant bought a diamond ring, gold bracelet, necklace and other valuables, and other electronic products, these items are in the defendant. The plaintiff gave the defendant under the name of housing mortgage and credit card fees are also a total of 10,000 yuan.<br> <br>The court finds that: the defendant should be returned to the plaintiff on behalf of its mortgage and credit card fees<br> <br>The court held that the plaintiff and defendant both sides met after hastily without fully understanding the registration of marriage, when planning a wedding because of a trivial and dispute,woolrich outlet italia, leading to both emotional breakdown, the plaintiffs asked for a divorce, the defendants also agreed to divorce, so divorce to support demands for the prosecution Both sides divorce.<br> <br>As for the plaintiff requested the defendant to return 100,000 yuan bride price issue, the court held that the money is actually the plaintiff and defendant jointly and severally consumption, has been identified at the defendant was only 40,000 yuan in cash, ruled that the defendant should be returned; for others had been consumed expenditure, the legal basis of no return, it can not be the actual return; the plaintiff to the defendant to repay mortgages and credit cards 10,000 yuan, because before love and registration of marriage, the defendant shall be returned; plaintiff returned other items,http://xia.mods.jp/cgi-bin/ph/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=viewres&target=789/, because it is the original defendant at the time of registration of marriage love and some consumer resistance gift, not a bride price,http://demo.gztzsoft.com/news/html/?60791.html, it will not support the claim of the plaintiff.<br> <br>After receiving the verdict,nike air max pas cher, the plaintiff Qiang Wei said yesterday refused to accept the verdict, he thought the time was 100,000 yuan bride price money to the defendant as a wedding, and now the court returned the other only one of 40,000 yuan,air max femme, which he can not accept. At present, Wei Qiang has appealed to the Xi'an Intermediate People's Court. & Nbsp;<br> <br>Edit: SN123<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
ruled that the defendant should be returned
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.