DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

Buyiburao in embarrassment to the government

(1 post)
  • Started 10 years ago by olpsdf036571

  1. Played nearly two years of litigation, the inner side Ji macro office instruments on Billboard's case has piled up the hill. Support of Zhejiang Provincial High Court of Hong Ji allow parties feel the power of the law.<br>April 18, 2011, Hangzhou, Jiangsu businessman Fang Ji macro section "101" times here, as happened here together "without legal formalities demolitions billboard" dispute rushing. This time, Fang Ji macro administration finally got a verdict by the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court, the verdict is determined Jianggan District People's Government administrative action to force the removal of three generous advertising billboards illegal, this judgment allows parties Ji grand Daimatsu the tone. Fang Ji macro is a generous person in charge of advertising, this time from the time of the demolitions occurred in June 2009 has been nearly two years, he said he finally harvested "fair."<br> <br>In the past 700 days and nights,http://tuonela.s138.xrea.com/lightbbs/light.cgi?res=9950, Fang Ji macro from demolitions around this event hit consecutive multi lawsuit, coming and going of various legal instruments piled up half the height,http://www.forestia.org/sunbbs/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=27&page=1%3C/a%3E, from inadmissible to accept, from the first instance and then remanded to the second instance until judgment, Fang Ji macro never give up, even if by some people in the back called a "shyster." Lawsuit hit now, he has gone from a simple an explanation, evolved into a kind of faith and war. Just because he believed - Chinese law is just, fair might be late, but it definitely will not see. That time the sun shone through the heavy clouds, hit him in the face,http://www.8264.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, but also a season of spring.<br> <br>Government demolitions billboards<br> <br>Looking back at the cause of this demolitions, in fact, anti-aircraft guns but from highway advertising campaigns to a government-led. It happened in June 2009, when the Jiangsu generous advertising company in Jianggan District erected a roadside pond prepared three anti-aircraft artillery billboards, because the Riverside area highway improvement needs, the district government established the Riverside area highway renovation Office ( hereinafter referred to as high whole Office), organized urban management and other departments tried to tear down the company's three generous advertising billboards.<br> <br>As generous advertising company responsible manner Ji macro Jianggan District Government's approach to disagree, he insisted that only in high office presented the whole legal procedures, had just agreed to do the whole high dismantle billboards. But from June 11, 2009 it has been deadlocked until June 17, the entire high office has not provided the appropriate procedures.<br> <br>And many newspapers demolitions similar case, the two sides back and forth in the entanglement of matter, on the occasion of the negotiations, June 18, 2009, high whole organization, including the Riverside District Office of Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau, Public Security Bureau Jianggan District, Riverside District Urban office, dozens of people Jianggan District majority of the Town government staff, police, including joint law enforcement team, to be generous in Jiangsu billboard advertising demolitions.<br> <br>Demolitions staff also did not show any formalities, generous advertising company Liu Yi left at the scene to stop the demolitions in the process of being hit, and subsequently detained by police scene, leaving their vehicles were smashed at the scene law enforcement personnel, vehicles are also immediately Jianggan District traffic police brigade detained, of course, the scene of billboards have been dismantled there is no suspense.<br> <br>Regardless of the cost according to activists<br> <br>Fang Ji macro decided to seek justice, he tried to hire a local lawyer to resolve the matter in Hangzhou, but a lot of Hangzhou, a lawyer with the local government to destabilize heard, meaning there is retreat. In desperation, Fang Ji, Wang had to hire legal workers Zhu Yuhuai Jiangsu with its rushing for that matter.<br> <br>Fang Ji macro combing the whole process of the demolitions of events, that the presence of four major problems demolitions event. One: Remove billboards no procedures; Second: the public security organs in their employees Liu Yi was beaten not only identified after the fact, but to Liu Yi obstructing the grounds of his administrative detention; Third: Liu Yi was beaten, vehicle smashed wrongdoing; Fourth: the traffic police to detain vehicles were smashed and it is illegal.<br> <br>With four major problems, Fang Wang Ji began to select the channels one complaint, petition the local authorities, the mayor's hotline, the public security department of the complaint bodies are all waiting for him to come, but the effect is not obvious, do not forget such things? Someone gave him Weapon, we can take some drastic measures to make things blow up, causing widespread concern in public opinion to resolve the matter. There are also some sympathy for Wang Fang Ji Hangzhou local lawyer advised: look for relations, all ways, find senior care about, and lose money even if the reduction of point losses. what to do? Fang Ji macro bitter to the night, to give up these recommendations and made a surprising decision: he wants to pass laws to have a say,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/ebest-dvd/0000000659511.html, for at any cost.<br> <br>After Zhu Yuhuai and hired lawyers to negotiate, Fang Ji macro decided to issue the proposed four demolitions event into four parts complaint eleven courts, that is since then, Fang Ji, Wang et al., Became Zhejiang Jianggan District Court, Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court of Zhejiang Provincial High Court of regulars.<br> <br>Nearly two years, Fang Ji macro times I went to Hangzhou, more than 50 times, with other people's forensics number of times to Hangzhou, more than 100 times. From the generous advertising company located in Zhejiang, Hangzhou, a round-trip distance is 700 kilometers, self-deprecating side Ji macro lawsuit rushing to distance over the long march, if not involved in the energy into the lawsuit transport costs had already exceeded 10 million.<br> <br>Prosecute illegal demolitions wins<br> <br>The first lawsuit, but also the largest demolitions billboards event crux - the legality of the demolitions. August 2009, Fang Ji macro to the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court filed administrative complaint, asking for confirmation Jianggan District People's Government of 18 June 2009 the specific administrative act "forced removal" of illegal billboards, and compensation for billboards removed the actual loss caused by the billboard 1 million yuan and 7500 yuan loss of vehicles.<br> <br>But the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court made the subsequent administrative ruling to the parties Ji macro blow. In this (2009) by the beginning of the word Zhejiang Hangzhou No. 30 administrative ruling, the Court finds that the forced removal behavior generous advertising company petitioned the Department of the fact that conduct, the prosecution asked the court to confirm the action is illegal and damages, should be administrative authorities dealt with first, generous advertising company directly proceedings,tn reuqin pas cher, does not meet the conditions placed on administrative cases, the people's court, so the case inadmissible.<br> <br>"I do not believe it!" Fang Ji Wang said he desperately queries law, according to activists found his way and did not finish.<br> <br>September 18, 2009, Jiangsu generous advertising company filed an administrative appeal to the Higher People's Court of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Provincial High Court in accordance with the requirements of the Supreme Court on the 8th [2000] judicial interpretation of the provisions of Article 68, the revocation of the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court The administrative ruling, instruction Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court accepted and placed on file the trial verdict.<br> <br>This time, Fang Ji macro win, in February 2010, Zhejiang Provincial High Court made a final ruling, the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court designated received generous advertising companies filing lawsuits.<br> <br>After another period of relatively lengthy court trial, in September 2010, Fang Ji macro got the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court of first instance verdict, the first instance verdict Jianggan District People's Government "forced removal" specific administrative act of illegal billboards, at the time the compensation is smashed vehicle repairs, but the removal of billboards loss compensation request is not supported.<br> <br>"Received the verdict, my more emboldened, and I believe that in the framework of the law rights, things always can be resolved." Fang Ji Wang said. He received the first instance verdict did not take long, generous advertising company Xiang Zhejiang Provincial Higher People's Court of Appeal, claiming losses dismantle billboards.<br> <br>December 2010, Zhejiang Provincial High Court once again to make an administrative ruling, revoked the administrative decision made by the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court in September, the case was then sent back to the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court for retrial, January 18, 2011, the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court re-filing.<br> <br>April 18, 2011, Jianggan District Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court ruling government "forced removal" specific administrative act of illegal billboards; demolitions cause vehicle damage compensation costs 6,510 yuan; after compensation for the loss of the three were removed billboards cost 500,000 yuan; court costs 50 yuan by the Riverside district government.<br> <br>Prosecution - inadmissible - Appeal - Specify accepted - the first instance verdict - Appeal - retrial verdict, "forced removal" billboard also handle their own behavior from the executive,http://www.bilaterals.org/spip.php?article22779, to determine executive administrative act as illegal, then compensation for losses caused by administrative violations, Fang Ji macro that such change is the victory of the law.<br> <br>"Although we award compensation of 500,000 yuan, but our actual losses of 150 million, then I will appeal," Fang Ji Wang said.<br> <br>Fang Ji macro in the above case kept running in the courts at the same time,moncler outlet italia, several other lawsuits are also in progress. In July 2009, in support of side Ji macro, generous advertising company employees Liu Yi Jianggan District of Hangzhou City Public Security Bureau in administrative detention on the grounds wrong, which sued Jianggan District Court.<br> <br>Liu Yi-related cases also more paradoxical. "Forced removal" billboard that day,piumini moncler sito ufficiale, Liu Yi will be parked at the Billboard demolitions prevent law enforcement officers, law enforcement officers with stones smashed cars, resulting in vehicle damage, while wishing to get off the beaten drag Liu Yi, Liu Yi then start the car I want failed to escape,moncler outlet milano, still dragged off beaten meal. Later Liu Yi was also in law enforcement against being the scene of the Riverside District Branch of Hangzhou Public Security Bureau on suspicion of obstructing police officers in the name of the implementation of administrative detention (29 November 2009 SEVEN magazine Modern Express reported on this in detail).<br> <br>Administrative detention after Liu Yi, Fang Ji macro immediately call the mayor's hotline, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province Public Security Bureau, Hangzhou Public Security Bureau of telephone complaints: a war without legal formalities demolitions behavior, stop it, actually turned into obstructing! Immediately, administrative reasons detained by the police from "obstructing official business" into a "way of intentional butt car deliberately harm others."<br> <br>After Liu Yi prosecution, Jianggan District Court on September 23 the same year made a verdict, the court finds that the evidence Jianggan District Hangzhou City Public Security Bureau to provide sufficient proof of intentional butt Liu Yi to drive way, intentionally causing bodily harm , so to maintain the administrative penalty decision public security organs. Liu Yi Fang Ji macro support will be the case soon appeal to the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court, March 30, 2010, the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court made a final decision, upheld the Jianggan District Court verdict.<br> <br>"Liu Yi hide in the car, smashed cars and make the other side is dragged off to fight Liu Yi, Liu Yi car tried to run, the other big lock up again let Liu Yi run and drove in the process of three people slightly injured, The results said Liu Yi hit his car. they do not smashed cars not hit, Liu Yi how you drive? "For the verdict, Fang Ji macro and satisfied, he said it would appeal the High Court of Zhejiang.<br> <br>Buyiburao comic lawsuit<br> <br>After the "demolitions incident" occurred, Liu Yi driving<br> <br>The vehicle also detained local police department. Until August 2009, Fang Ji, Wang et al., Got the Jianggan District Management Office to mention car note, the local traffic police department had just returned to the buckle of the vehicle. Together illegal "demolitions" deduction has become their bargaining chip, which in turn is what reason? For the same reason, Riverside Hangzhou Public Security Bureau Traffic Police Detachment brigade immediately became a defendant.<br> <br>The claims were dismissed Jianggan District Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court and the Court. Fang Ji macro immediately filed a complaint with the Zhejiang Higher People's Court of Zhejiang Provincial High Court in turn go to the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court to review the case. May 6, 2010, the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court issued a notice to the applicant rejected the retrial Ji Wang et al., But the side Ji macro has filed a lawsuit.<br> <br>At this point, Fang Ji Wang et al., Demolitions event had carded four major problems have been three legal action, fourth and Liu Yi was beaten, smashed vehicle problems, Fang Ji, Wang et al., Choose one to start is the police, the public security departments in accordance with law Liu Yi was beaten to investigate, the vehicle smashed cases. However, the claim was soon public security organs do not meet the conditions placed on the ground refused, and issued a notice of not filing.<br> <br>But Fang Ji Wang et al studied the law and found that the criminal case does not make a decision of the investigation public security organs after no way out. First, they can file a complaint to the court, but the court upheld the decision to quickly public security organs. Then they decided to bring criminal private prosecution in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations. April 28, 2011, received a generous advertising company Jianggan District Court sent the notice, saying the lack of criminal private prosecution case two private prosecutor and the defendant's identity material identity materials, need to be supplemented. "Recently the supplementary material will be sent in the past, I believe the case will have a result." Fang Ji Wang said.<br> <br>"Shyster" or according to activists?<br> <br>In addition to the first case side Ji macro where generous advertising company won the other three from lawsuit judgments are other Ji Wang et al unfavorable, but Buyiburao square Ji Wang has not given up, coming and going of various legal instruments in the side Ji macro office piled up half the height. In addition, Fang Ji macro also filed a complaint with the Hangzhou People's Congress, the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court misjudged cases there may be a problem in the trial of the case, requiring the program to start investigation into misjudged cases.<br> <br>It is also because of this reason, someone behind the side Ji macro called "shyster." In fact, regardless of the court, the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court of Zhejiang Provincial High Court or relevant staff of the Riverside area, Fang Ji macro for this case, as well as side Ji macro himself, are impressive.<br> <br>Recently, reporters were calling the above three courts, for understandable reasons, the other party has refused to promote discipline, interviewed relevant staff of Zhejiang Provincial High Court even has support side Ji macro appeal also politely said no comment.<br> <br>Insider evaluate the case, "said the demolitions event" is not complicated, after nearly two years of back and forth as long confrontation, self verdict Jianggan District People's Government "forced removal" specific administrative act of illegal billboards and compensation after the whole case has basically come to an end. As Fang Ji macro own behavior, of course, controversial. "Some people think that in fact side Ji macro is to seize a number of governmental agencies, Buyiburao in embarrassment to the government, is a typical 'shyster' also suggested that regardless of the party in the end Ji Wang is how to think,http://karua.at.webry.info, as long as he is in now There are legal under the law for their own rights, it is not to mention illegal, the court in accordance with the relevant provisions of the law as long as you can. "<br> <br>"Power" must obey the law<br> <br>After "His approach is consistent with the spirit of the rule of law." SOUTHERN Jiangnan University professor told reporters yesterday heard expressed related.<br> <br>SOUTHERN said that through legal rights is a very positive thing, but it should be the whole society should actively promote things. Only if we all believe that the law, by the law to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, to be able to reflect the value of the law, reflect the "power" in the spirit of the rule of law must obey the law.<br> <br>SEVEN dialogue<br> <br>Many people like me, and do not dare to abuse of power<br> <br>Reporter: In order to file suit, spent nearly two years, the transportation cost is more than 100,000, it's not a matter of effort involved, what support you?<br> <br>Fang Ji macro: Because I believe that the law will give me an explanation,louboutin soldes femme, at the beginning there is always a lot of people and I say, and the government is not going to win a lawsuit, litigation time-consuming, not as good as in other ways,http://bell.room.ne.jp/~geki/guestbook/apeboard.cgi/, but I do not think so.<br> <br>Reporter: It is said privately the other party has tried to mediate before?<br> <br>Fang Ji macro: I never agreed to mediation. I started a lawsuit to seek justice for themselves, and later my main aim is to make those law enforcement long memory. How do you say? Annual government to bring the taxpayers so much money to raise so many government officials, the government has been promoting administration according to law, and that officials should be according to law. Let me run into the administration of the law no matter, I'm going to teach them a lesson, telling them not so good flicker ordinary citizen, you do not administration, it is a price to pay. So the next time they make any move at the time, it is necessary to think more, so my goal is achieved.<br> <br>Reporter: Some people think you are loopholes, a "shyster."<br> <br>Fang Ji macro: I think the reason more debates, more debates law clear. The past two years I was able to go all the way, have a sound appreciation of the law, the first law gives me enough relief approach, followed by claims litigation process, we can find one of the appropriate legal basis in the program, that why I do not put lawsuit crushed it? And if it is not my insistence,http://baimaclub.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=3558, why I was able to get the final verdict administrative violations and reparation result?<br> <br>I once again proved that China's lawsuit is still speak the rule of law, administration according to law and the road will become wide. In this way, we need to continue to pay all citizens, so that the owner's do their own masters, do public servants do public servants, so as to really change things. Today's society is a society of democracy and rule of law, we should promote the Chinese legal process a force. To have the courage to say no to those unscrupulous people and things to be corrected behavior. Just like me, many people, who will not abuse of public power with impunity abuse of public authority, administration according to law in order to fully implement.<br> <br>Reporter: For this matter, what is your greatest feeling?<br> <br>Fang Ji macro: the greatest feeling is to have legal weapons wherever will not suffer. I started to rush this thing, a lot of people actually in contact is very arrogant attitude, and later we touch down, I found out that the old parties have understanding, attitudes will slowly change, do not say to me better, best At least everything can be a businesslike. So now I would like to thank most courts judges involved in this litigation, no matter how the court sentence, at least they are in accordance with the normal public hearing of the case to clear, even though I have a different opinion on the decision, it is also for the law understand the problem, rather than rely on their power to force me to go how how.<br> <br>Reporter's notes<br> <br>Faith in the law, is to respect the "rules of the game"<br> <br>Interview for so many years, hit government illegal administration is not the first, but Fang Ji macro such as the law demands directly addressed, and rare. Under normal circumstances, ordinary people run into government illegal administration, the first reaction is to look for the media, hoping to create public pressure. Similarly, in order to put pressure on the government, many people choose, such as by "jumping show", "Dulu" and other ways to express more intense.<br> <br>Frustrating is that such behavior is often really be able to resolve the matter, but also sometimes conflicts intensify, the party became a "petition households", the government forced to take more drastic ways to deal with the problem, which In fact, the greatest tragedy is the law.<br> <br>In the side Ji macro story, whether it is square himself, or the courts of Zhejiang Province and even accused the court of Jianggan District People's Government and other government departments, we are trying to solve the problem in the framework of the law. Why is this sentence, which according to the law, in the judgment of the Court in the instrument are clearly written. At least from the current level, the case can be disclosed, we did not find too much interference of public power of a court decision.<br> <br>A modern society, should be a legally faith community, all members of society should work under the rules of the game that is legal. Such and such, social justice can only be achieved with the minimum price.<br> <br>□ Express reporter Kim Jin Chen Chao<br> <br>Photo coverage<br> Microblogging Recommended | today's hot microblogging (edit: SN047)<br>

    Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.