<p> after the Hebei High Court to prevent lawyers access to dossiers on the "very strange",giuseppe zanotti pas cher, actually give birth "to do good conscience before ghosts Mengen" speculation, but also makes the case correction with a distinctive "rule of man" mark. All slightly strange phenomenon in the past behind, in fact,http://www.xmarks.com/s/site/www.tadayumi.sakura.ne.jp/apeboard_plus.cgi/, can be attributed to error correction within the judicial system thinking errors that case correction must be "virtual certainty",http://cand.qee.jp/link_p/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=viewres&target/;/, only that it is the wrong case before the judiciary hundred percent start correcting process,hollister magasin, or not You can easily start. Since the decision relates to the fairness of the stability of authority and entities, in practice the judiciary appear to be relatively more cautious. This thinking is also reflected in the error correction retrial start of the provisions of the law is very strict conditions.</p>
<p> My point is: should these typical cases,nike france,http://www.zzklv.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=91341, reflection judicial practice of "suspected crime conviction can from there, error correction must be a certainty," the error of thinking, to establish the rule of law from the law from the "conviction must clinches, error correction should suspect as innocent "judicial philosophy. View Nie Shubin case reasons for the delay can not enter the retrial procedure, it is because we are too concerned about the substance of the results retrial procedure,http://www.sharebbs.org/thread-60535-1-1.html,peuterey online, while ignoring its first judicial proceedings as independent value. Referee in force what is not wrong case,http://www.ceszttc.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=309429,barbour lyon, the most authoritative judgment but to restart the judicial process,barbour femme, in strict accordance with the law of the trial were determined according to the law. As long as there is ample evidence,woolrich milano, the process is open and transparent, legitimate judgment evidence, even if the original decision is not wrong,http://vshine.dl.net.cn/forum.php?mod=forumdisplay&fid=47&filter=typeid&typeid=73, it is a family member of the defendant in terms of procedural fairness, for society is a response mechanism. Nie case, his mother thought, "I have the greatest wish is to retrial," it seems the result is not so important, the retrial could give a logical,air max pas cher chine, eliminate all sorts of doubts the legitimacy of the conclusions here,hogan online, even more important. Unfortunately, this is always difficult to demonstrate due process,hogan outlet, instead it is the elusive "internal opinions." What starts in which part of the card which level? Despite public opinion called for justice is still showing a color mysticism. For example.</p>
<p> whether the courts or procuratorates,louboutin pas cher, retrial will need to find effective judgment "really wrong" and for the "definite error" of subjective perception,barbour france, often need higher than the previous conviction evidentiary requirements. That is, if it is not evidence of a hundred percent wrong case,hollister california, are generally not easily start the retrial. And correction of exculpatory evidence emphasize the opposite extreme,hogan scarpe, criminal justice evidentiary requirements for a conviction are more relaxed,tn, often take "Doubtful from the" thinking. Perhaps misjudged cases occurred each have their own rhyme or reason, but common reasons are lower standards of evidence, leading to the fall of justice. Legislation,peuterey sito ufficiale, our country set up "sufficient evidence" standard of principle,http://bbs.innotown.cc/home.php?mod=space&uid=391, but in the specific conviction process,piumino moncler,http://80china.com/space.php?uid=514486&do=blog&id=1543700, what is consistent with the "really adequate" requirements,basket louboutin femme, often influenced by prevailing local criminal policy against crime. So in practice, the evidence is not so "really adequate" cases, it may be based on the reality of the need to combat crime and lower standard of proof.</p>