louboutin vente « DavidCadogan.ca Forums

DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

louboutin vente

(1 post)

Started 10 years ago by ybie99pk1i9

Tags:

ybie99pk1i9
Member
 Yesterday, the Morning News "to the high altitude parabolic say 'no'," a series of reports published the first chapter, "85-year-old man was killed by white bottle thrown at high altitude." Today,hogan outlet milano, following the high altitude parabolic causing casualties,ceinture 2015 nouvelles arrivées, the Morning News focus is altitude parabolic caused property damage. July 13,chaussures louboutin, 2014, a front windshield Minhang district residents chai car was smashed pots,cappelli 47brand, they can not find the perpetrators, he had to put the pots might throw together 26 owners to court. This year on April 15, Minhang District court, the economic losses 26 accused Sarkozy vehicle smashed flat result. Morning News reporter Ye Songli &#160,coach bracciali; Case hearing Plaintiff: Provide evidence of the fact of infringement three samples &#160,cappelli jordan; 2014 July 13 night, live in the district of another building chai plaintiff in the small car parked downstairs Minhang District, a district south of the 14th, 133 parking spaces, front windshield of a vehicle is one of aloe pots hit. Police Department crime scene found that the accident caused upstairs threw a flower pot of aloe vera. Because no one admitted that he threw pots, chai had their own car to the repair shop, maintenance costs for the 1758 yuan. Because no one recognized the perpetrators, so Sarkozy will likely throw pots,chapeau hip hop, 2nd Floor, Building 14, the 14th floor to the owners to court. To this end, chai to query real estate registration information, resulting in a 130 yuan inquiry fee. In court,louboutin pigalle pas cher, Mr. Qi provides the following evidence: First, the public security department received a report 1 single receipt to prove that the public security departments have been documented material plaintiff is falling flowerpot hit the vehicle of the above facts, Building 14; the second is the above inquiry form,gioielli tiffany, prove that the defendant is the owner; the third is the scene photographs to prove that the plaintiff's vehicle was hit pots facts. To this end,fendi lunette de soleil, the court requested chai: 1, the defendant in proportion to compensate the plaintiff maintenance costs because of high altitude parabolic car hit the front windshield caused the plaintiff 1,758 yuan; 2, the defendant in proportion to compensate the plaintiff Chadang costs 130 yuan. Defendant: &#160,chapeau 47brand; 7 people reply but did not provide evidence According to the verdict, there are seven defendants reply. The defendant argued that a written consent process by the court according to the law, the remaining six have denied themselves thrown pots, reason to deny vary: some emphasize no subjective intent, some explanation from the physical point of view can not throw home by themselves out,ed hardy bracciali, while others indicated that they do not support and do not often live plants. One of the defendants also argued that: 26 people indeed may cause this result, someone other than the 26 people may also cause this result, the house number of other people may also cause this result, other people can also enter the 14th floor. Written notice fingerprints on pots on the property, can be determined by identifying who threw way. However, despite the above-mentioned defendants reply, but did not provide evidence and cross-examination were issued an opinion on the evidence provided by the plaintiff. Court: You may not need to prove the infringement before the perpetrators Disclaimer The court held that, throwing items from the building or objects falling from the building causes damage to others, it is difficult to determine the specific infringed, in addition to outside can prove that they are not infringed, the person may harm of compensation for use of the building. In this regard, the Court analyzed as follows: on the one hand, combined with the specific location and time of the incident the case of vehicles damaged parts of the vehicle parked front windows windshield system, the location of the damaged vehicle is located below residential building defendant; at the same time , the vehicle left the scene also damaged the vehicle in front of the tree leaves, which can be extrapolated accident pots thrown or falling from the Department of the building caused by the defendants live: On the other hand, according to the plaintiff damaged vehicles stay there is the fact that the leaves, by the hospital site investigation, the tree and the defendant lived on the first floor of buildings in parallel,new balance femme, combining residential parking position and accused the distance between the buildings, the likelihood of infringement is sufficient to exclude the first floor of the owners. Based on the above analysis, the Court finds that the defendant in this case the burden of responsibility should be compensated for the loss of the plaintiff reasonable. April 15 this year,chaussures nike pas cher, after three trial, the court judgment into effect in 10 days, 26 defendants each compensation chai 72.61 yuan. 25 yuan litigation costs, chai pay 4 points, and the remaining 26 defendants to pay 0.96 yuan per person. After the trial reaction Plaintiff: &#160,spaccio moncler; "Court to pay more than 1,800 yuan." Sarkozy admits that, at the beginning he did not intend to sue, but through communication property and neighborhood, he found a lot of people this is a matter not related to their attitude,chaussures nike, even people he had misunderstood, so he decided to seriously , for those who like a parabolic aerial alert. Because the case is relatively small, so there is no lawyer. Sarkozy also their own money into the real estate trading center in Minhang property registration information for each user to print out buildings, a lot of trouble before you get ready material. "This lawsuit, we can not from the money point of view, in fact, I was playing this lawsuit, to pay far more than more than 1800 yuan of money." Chai bluntly,louboutin, he would like to take the case to the owners reminder: altitude parabolic damage other people's property, never smashed white hit! Sarkozy said he would entrust the collection of the relevant departments of the defendant's compensation, "after the appeal period, if they do not pay, I will apply to the court for execution. Execution of this behavior, we will deepen their understanding on this matter." Defendant: "I would not give this money." For chai practice, those accused of residential property owners have to see how A woman on the 12th floor, said: "Oh, you 70 yuan of money, as long as someone closing the door, I will give our consumption can not afford this time." The lady said, adding that her family never kept a flora. Since the court sentenced so, certainly according to the law, she had to accept it. A woman on the 10th floor, said she was very satisfied with this decision:!! "The money I would not give if I gave the money, people will think this is really bad I did not have my family flower pots, balconies are sealed with, where we have to throw pots Where thrown down " &#160,giubbotti moncler; One not to say that they lived a few floors Mr. said that the first hearing, he went to court, but the court provided a witness innocent excuse, but the court held that the lack of evidence, inadmissible. But the gentleman said he supported the lawsuit: "flowerpot this building who certainly thrown to, that person does not always stand up, his heart will always be subjected to torture,armani occhiali da vista, let him go remorse!" (Original title: pots airborne smashed cars,modelli moncler, building owners had to pay 26) Edit: SN117 
相关的主题文章：
Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.