,http://101.200.1.91/apps.php?q=diary&a=detail&did=89177&uid=3337<p> the Full Court said: Ren did not provide evidence that 300,000 yuan funding sources and amounts set forth in the delivery of a promissory note, written IOU advocate Cheng stated sum was gambling,louboutin femme pas cher, which submitted Jeong the testimony of witnesses, audio and video recording, and obtain a court Cheng, Lee witness the public security organs interrogation transcripts,http://www.itanon.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=761316,nike air max outlet, Zheng and the fact that he and other evidence of financial dealings details. Comprehensive case the available evidence, suspects the existence of the case, the court rejected the prosecution of Mr. Ren Cheng, and transferred to public security authorities. Interpretation Why refer the case to the public security organs Zhen Jieying Full Court presiding judge in this case, in accordance with the Supreme Court issued the "People's Court on Several Opinions lending cases" in the provision, private lending refers to the loan dispute lending disputes between natural persons.</p>
<p>000 yuan,http://www.pk-w.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=134602, 300,000 yuan Ren requirements issued IOUs Jeong,abercrombie paris, Lee came forward to negotiate the matter, after 180,000 yuan to Lee Cheng checks, Lee Lee commissioned employees,air max pas cher femme, and gave Zhou Ren after cash. Zhou employees as witnesses to testify of the check to cash the relevant circumstances. The trial, Mr Cheng also produced recordings and video, audio and video, Mr. Ren Cheng reminder repay gambling debts, Mr Cheng said the gambling lose money themselves recognize,louboutin soldes, but the amount is too high,chaussures giuseppe zanotti pas cher,http://www.yyxww.net/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=152353, the possibility of grace. In another section of the recording Cheng submission,http://sjh.bbs.windplay.cn/forum-53-1.html?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, the fact that he threatened to Mr. Zheng's wife. Second instance court dismissed the prosecution case there is suspicion that the crime In the second trial process, by Cheng apply to a judge in the Court of Haidian Branch of Beijing Public Security Bureau police station Manjuji,woolrich donna,http://1973523.info/cgi/warp/apeboard_plus.cgi//, the transfer of the public security organs to report Ren Cheng opened ball Trang report record of inquiry, a judge in the Court also to bank, collect the details of Mr Cheng and the fact that he carried money exchanges,http://vshine.dl.net.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1120067, the two sides have been frequent funds. In recognition of the fact that he was sitting in the authenticity of the evidence,zanotti homme, but to prove the contents were not recognized, funds for frequent exchanges between the two sides, the fact that he said that debtor-creditor relationship,http://www.xmarks.com/s/site/www.tadayumi.sakura.ne.jp/apeboard_plus.cgi/os/,abercrombie france, but do not have the promissory note or receipt. Mr Cheng also stated in court its conduct Internet gambling by Ren process: "Yim give me a user name and password, the maximum amount is 50,000 yuan gambling, no more than 50,000 yuan if the amount of gambling, the two sides is that every Monday, win or lose the case settled last week. I bet all the time in every virtual money, just in time to re-calculate the settlement of winners and losers. Handicap odds different for each, such as the odds are 0.78,nike air jordan, then I bet 10000 Yuan, even if I can only get win 7800 yuan,air max pas cher pour femme, as long as I bet, Yim will extract money from betting interests in proportion. " One hospital after hearing the verdict.</p>
<p> In addition, Lee Cheng has been repaid through an intermediary 17 million debtor-creditor relationship does not exist between the two sides, it does not agree with the fact that he claims. Court of First Instance judgment in February 2014, recognized the fact that he submitted IOU to prove the existence of civil legal relationship between its lending and Cheng,zanotti femme, Cheng argued that although there is no relationship between borrowers and lenders,air jordan, because gambling form involved IOU The debtor-creditor relationship, but this did not submit Jeong valid evidence to prove that it argued that the evidence is insufficient,2014 Scarpe Hogan, the hospital inadmissible. Mr Cheng also argued its payments owed 17 million, and have all been repaid,giubbotti woolrich, but this did not submit evidence to prove that it argued, the hospital also inadmissible. Who owed gambling money to appeal against sentence Cheng refused to accept the judgment of first instance courts,outlet nike online, appeal to the Beijing Intermediate Court. During the second trial,nike france, Mr Cheng submit a number of supplementary evidence. Among them, the witness Lee on June 19, 2014 to testify, said the fact that he and Lee are friends, relations,abercrombie fitch, Lee knew the fact that he opened the ball Zhuang, Cheng would like gambling, will introduce two know, after two self-Contact gambling issues. By the end of 2012 or early 2013 Mr Cheng telephone contact Lee said Yim gambling because gambling owed 170.</p>