<br>□ Evening News correspondent Cheng Yi correspondent Yankee yuan<br> <br>Posting on the home computer, said Xu et 3 "public funds tourism, eat a maintenance fund,http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/photos/search.cgi, is corrupt when killed,woolrich outlet milano," the court. Although Ms. Chen advocated Posted than their own,piumini moncler, but it argues it has not been accepted. Recently, the Minhang District court verdict, Ms. Chen a written apology, as Mr. Xu three rehabilitation and compensation for moral damages solatium 1000 yuan each.<br> <br>"Corrupt elements," said one trigger litigation<br> <br>April 4 this year,http://tuonela.s138.xrea.com/lightbbs/light.cgi?res=1840, network people called "old Abba" published a post in online forums, the main contents are: "March, the district director of the industry,http://www.mapfan.com/spotdetail.cgi, the Commission, together with all the members of the industry committee and Mr. Xu and other three people together to Hong Kong,http://associationflainoise.fr/spip.php?article76, Macau, is junket? travel at their own expense? Our maintenance fund has been a lot of black, as if the owners were plucked chicken hair, trampled upon. abominable corrupt elements, when killing Finish? "<br> <br>The public security agencies in the investigation, found that the terminal post in Chan residence. Ms Chan said, may be when a neighbor came to play with the computer send a message. July 14,http://www.ad.cyberhome.ne.jp/~k-morita/clip/papalani.cgi, the public security organ finds Chan illegal facts are not established, no administrative penalties.<br> <br>Mr. Xu and other three people think that they simply have not been to Hong Kong tourism. Post content makes a lot of users thread, regarded them as corrupt, people keep calling home even questioned, abuse, physical and psychological harm to them. They sued Ms. Chan ordered the immediate cessation of reputation infringement, a written apology and publicly posted in the district for their rehabilitation apology, eliminating the effects, while compensation for moral damages solatium three people each 20,000 yuan.<br> <br>The defendant argued that the post of non-own hair<br> <br>Chan argues that the post text is divided into three sections, the content in question are the owners' committee, rather than the other three people asked Mr. Xu, which has not accused Mr. Xu et 3 people mess with maintenance funds to travel. After the post was published, only one thread. In fact, before this post was published,louboutin soldes femme,http://www.lib.city.saitama.jp, existing residential property owners within the industry, the Commission took the money to the Hong Kong Tourism rumors, but in the case of the accounts of the owners 'committee are unclear,scarpe hogan, the owners have the right to challenge the owners' committee led to Hong Kong is at public expense or at their own expense. I Department of residential property owners, although Mr. Xu and other three alleged not own published articles,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/kaguyahime/a-118.html, but the content of my post also involves the interests of, so please Mr. Xu et 3 shall be made clear on a number of economic questions answered. Dismiss petition.<br> <br>The court held that constitute defamation<br> <br>The court held that the public security organs verified, involving the Department of Posts issued by the home computer terminal Chan, Chan for computer holder or manager directly, in others there is no direct evidence of use or theft of their computer case issued the disputed posts next,piumini moncler sito ufficiale, it can be assumed they issued the disputed post system, Ms. Chen should bear corresponding civil liability. Ms. Chen provided written proof his mother only solitary card, lack of appropriate evidence. Ms Chan said in late April 2009, before its shared network cable and neighbors, but after the public security organs interrogation transcripts, but never talk about that part of the contents of this Court is also inadmissible.<br> <br>Upon review, the object pointed to post content is clear, the person who posted the question and answer approach to identify Mr. Xu and other three people use maintenance fund travel for corrupt elements. To delete from the report, the post continued in the forums some time, enough to make the audience especially for residential property owners and three personality Xu doubt, social assessment was reduced, damaged reputation. Ms. Chen is now no objective evidence that the content of the post is true,http://www.szkjcm.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=112000, so Xu et al claim 3 Chan bear corresponding civil liability petitioned the court to support.<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
cMP3eyG9av
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.