but did not give evidence to the contrary to be confirmed

DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

but did not give evidence to the contrary to be confirmed

(1 post)

Started 10 years ago by nkawa712884

Tags:

nkawa712884
Member

 After the hospital in accordance with the doctor asked to do the open lung biopsy, but 53-year-old Lee died in surgery. Families found that surgery to Ms. Lee is an intern, but hospitals also overcharged hospital charges. For this reason the families of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing Union Medical College Hospital (hereinafter referred to Union Hospital) to court, claims 69 million yuan. Reporters learned that morning, the Second Intermediate Court of Final Appeal found the Union Hospital at fault, compensation for the families of all kinds of judgments totaling more than 30 million loss, medical expenses and return the overcharged. Concord Hospital, the deceased's family argued that no fault report In July 2012,roshe run femme pas cher,http://bronestlyonnais.fr/spip.php?article41, Mr. Zhou and Ms. Lee's husband in China Conservatory student daughter Lily (a pseudonym) proceedings. The two plaintiffs, said April 3, 2011,hogan outlet, Ms. Lee because of suffocation after mild activity shortness of breath, coughing to Concord hospital treatment. Two weeks later, Union Hospital, made a left side for a small open lung biopsy. May 11 the same year, Ms. Lee died. The plaintiff believes that Lee is a chronic pneumonia, there is no need for surgical lung biopsy, Union Hospital interns arrangements for the implementation of Lee lung biopsy, and preoperative entirely obligation,http://bbs.mudmiss.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=187357&extra=, Lee pneumothorax after surgery, nor try to appropriate treatment obligations. The plaintiffs believe that there is no fault, Union Hospital, Union Hospital claim compensation for medical expenses, death compensation and other 69 million yuan, and the return of the medical expenses of 390.50 yuan overcharged. Union Hospital argued that Union Hospital Lee's death diagnosis of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary infection,http://www.chrisadamsperfumes.com/index.php?item/create_form/1, acute respiratory distress syndrome,piumini woolrich outlet,http://framasoft.net/spip.php?article5235, multi-organ failure,canada goose solde, left pneumothorax,http://www.radio-gresivaudan.org/spip.php?article2393, nodular goiter . Union Hospital believe they are not at fault, nor the existence of the problem of excessive checks. In addition, Union Hospital have objections to expert opinion, I do not agree with the plaintiff's claim. Forensic Sciences: Concord clinics exist four fault During the case hearing,http://web1031.webmall.hostdns.cc/news/html/?39768.html, the court commissioned the Beijing Hua generous Swiss judicial evidence identification center for identification. Since then issued identification center expert opinion that the presence of four wrongdoing Union Hospital in the treatment process: First,http://www.fjvip.org/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, medical writing is not standardized; second, failed to fulfill the obligation sufficient; third postoperative thoracic drainage is not fine, processing Measures Taken inappropriate; four highly cautious not entirely to duty of care, implementation of the small open lung biopsy indications, inadequate risk assessment. Identification of submissions that there is no causal relationship between paragraph 1, item 2 and the consequences of the damage in the medical fault behavior of Lee; and there is a certain causal link between the item 3, item 4 and the consequences of the damage . Identification of the view that the medical side negative secondary responsibility, participation grade C (theoretical coefficient of 25%). In court, the parties,nike air max pas cher, although there are objections to the expert opinion, but did not give evidence to the contrary to be confirmed, it would be adopted by the court expert opinion. Final judgment Concord lost 300,000 refund the overcharged for medical expenses Court of First Instance held that, Union Hospital,http://www.radio-gresivaudan.org/spip.php?article1768, there is no fault, causing the plaintiff's mental anguish, emotional distress and therefore the plaintiff requests the court to support, and at the discretion of the amount of the actual situation. In addition, the court held that the calculation of Union Hospital length of stay is wrong, more charged medical expenses, and should therefore be refunded. Court verdict to compensate the plaintiff, Union Hospital, more than 30 million, of which the spirit of solatium 25,000 yuan, while also refund the overcharged for medical expenses 390.50 yuan. After the verdict, Mr. Zhou appealed. Chow believed that his wife's condition and physical condition is not suitable for lung tissue biopsy, Union Hospital for patients with thoracic biopsy led to its death, Union Hospital should bear full responsibility. Union Hospital patients and their families without permission from the expansion of the size of the biopsy is the leading cause of death in patients. Asking the court commuted. The Concord hospital agreed in the original judgment. Second Intermediate People's Court, after hearing that Zhou advocated Union Hospital patients before surgery to mislead, conceal surgical risk, without expanding the size of the biopsy, but did not provide sufficient evidence to prove its claims, the court inadmissible. May 8, 2014, the Second Intermediate Court of Final Appeal ruling, dismissed Chow appeal and upheld the original verdict. Text / Reporter Hung snow & Nbsp; (Edit: SN086) 

Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.