Studies have shown that resume photo beauty looks normal or did not get more than women interviewed photo probability is low. (Information)<br>China Daily May 19 electrical (letter of) beautiful women who can look to get a lot of things,http://www.wwj68.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=79791, however, did not seem to find a job in this column. According to the British "Daily Mail" reported, the survey showed,http://bbs.langsin.net/home.php?mod=space&uid=981232, resume photo of beauty get more than looks normal or not attached photograph women have low chances of interview.<br> <br>On the contrary, it looks handsome men to resume attach a photo if they successfully enter the next part of the screening probability increases.<br> <br>Investigators believe that this is likely to be pretty jealous because women candidates candidates already working in the unit, they are afraid of their threats. In the past 18 months, Canada and Israel investigators to 2500 job offers submitted contrast two resumes,piumini moncler sito ufficiale, respectively.<br> <br>These resume information is falsified, each candidate has a wealth of experience and good quality, very suitable for job recruitment.<br> <br>Each group has a copy of your resume looks pretty or attach a resume ordinary photos. Investigators guarantee, looks absolutely beautiful candidates who generally looks much more beautiful than that.<br> <br>Previous studies have found that looks pretty seekers will make people think she is very smart, trustworthy. They are also easier to get a decent job,http://www.jbnh.cn/_new_shuidao/home.php?mod=space&uid=7482, a higher salary.<br> <br>However,nike tn pas cher, the survey results show that the resume is not attached photos to get the highest rate of female job interview, followed by attaching a photo but looks ordinary women, resume photo of beauty came in last.<br> <br>Factors nature of the work, the ability of candidates, public relations work and so can not explain this phenomenon. Wilfrid Laurier University in Ontario, Canada researcher Bradley Lafleur believes that this is because the candidates grown too beautiful. Research shows that most are engaged in recruitment of young, single women,moncler outlet milano, Lafleur think recruiters jealousy is the reason behind this phenomenon.<br> <br>He said: "The woman in charge of the recruitment will be jealous beautiful young women candidates,http://www.021yjq.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=87019, these candidates will be fighting for the opposite sex with them,http://sdseed.com.cn/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=256754, or at least it can be said,http://sns.14xi.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=612456,louboutin soldes femme, fighting heterosexual colleagues' attention."<br> <br>He added that beautiful women are usually seen as a "social magnet",piumini moncler sito ufficiale, easy and reduced efficiency. Alternatively,http://www.hyjtsoft.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=2857, male recruiters for fear of discontent caused the other half do not want to hire beautiful women.<br> <br>But for male candidates,http://www.ichongguan.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=24415, the handsome men attach a photo to get the most interviews, not accompanied by photos of male candidates the opportunity to get the candidates, followed by an interview attach a photo looks ordinary men have been the least.<br> <br>Lafleur said that looks ordinary male candidates need to cast a chance to get an interview than twice as many handsome candidates can resume.<br> <br>This phenomenon is even worse in the recruitment agency, at the same professional quality of the situation, they will make a choice based on the photo. In order to leave a good impression on the employer company, recruitment agencies tend to phase-out looks ordinary candidates.<br> <br>In China, the law requires candidates to attach a photo on your resume. Now in Britain, a growing number of candidates on a resume attach a photo.<br> <br>(Original title: beautiful photo should resume recruiters jealous or reduce their interviews - Chinese International - China Daily?)<br> <br>Edit: SN069<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
xeNBcY8Iqh
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.