DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

hogan roma on the contrary

(1 post)
  • Started 10 years ago by xiklpsdew

  1. xiklpsdew
    Member

    <p> the ownership of all agricultural land redistributed to individual farmers, so that each farmer can be assigned to the same amount of land. This will enable China's rural public ownership economy turned into the private economy,hogan sneakers, resulting in multiple serious economic and social consequences. 3. The land privatization can not guarantee "land to the tiller." "Land to the tiller" is the farming or farmers who own land, farming is all his land. "All of their lands," the saying goes,hogan donna, it can be cultivators land owned by individuals or families, can also be common to all of the land cultivators. Cultivator farming someone else if all the land,hogan rebel donna, including the land rented to others or to be employed to someone else's land or farm farming and so on, is "no Gengzhe its field." Almost all those who advocate the privatization of land. On both land privatization can do that only land to the tiller. The reality is precisely the private ownership of land to the tiller can not do, or even possible to make the concentration of land in a few hands of people who are not farming, resulting in no other field cultivators. China thousands of years of feudal society, many farmers little or no land of historical fact is proof. Even through the land reform of the landlords private ownership of land converted to private ownership of land by individual farmers or family, there is also the phenomenon of farmers because natural risk,hogan donna, market risk, operational failures, personal and family tragedies and other reasons lost in bankruptcy. Private ownership of land landowners farm laborers, tenant farmers, based on private ownership of land capitalist farms or family farms in agricultural workers are cultivators, are not its field; on the contrary, collective or common land cultivators all able to guarantee public ownership land to the tiller,scarpe uomo hogan, cultivator farming because they own land in common, in addition to the special circumstances of the country is reasonably necessary and was illegally deprived of expropriation,hogan outlet online, farmers generally can not lose a total land. The land privatization can not make the most of the farmers to get rich by selling land. Implement the privatization of land.</p>

    <p> so farmers have indeed complete land ownership, in accordance with the most favorable way since that free use, disposal and transfer,hogan outlet, it was only from the so-called "economic common sense" that land privatization to protect farmers' legitimate equity.</p>

    <p> making it difficult to transfer of rural surplus labor. Them where to go, what to do, how to survive? Although they are not the "three noes" farmers but "two noes" farmers (landless,spaccio hogan, unemployed),hogan uomo, but hundreds of millions of "two noes" farmer to live on social security,hogan online, social security,scarpe hogan, afford it? Can it last? And how to get rich? Some scholars have suggested,scarpe hogan outlet online, so that the privatization of agricultural land,hogan scarpe outlet, so the land to farming capable hands of the gathering, rehired by their peasant farming, for large-scale operations and intensive management,hogan sito ufficiale, greatly improving agricultural productivity, rural economic prosperity. The problem is the implementation of large-scale intensive management of private farm land or farming experts can not hire a large number of landless peasants, let alone private farms or farming experts to implement a more efficient management of mechanization of agricultural production, information technology, automation, socialization,hogan rebel junior, will a significant reduction in the use of and demand for agricultural labor, privatization and agricultural scale operation will not solve most of the way out of the problem of landless peasants. Moreover,hogan baby, the privatization of agricultural land privatization and capital are not the same. China's capital is not primarily through the privatization of public capital will be assigned to individuals to achieve, but allow,hogan scarpe, encourage private investment and attract foreign investment and the formation of capital is not fully privatized,hogan spaccio, but the partial privatization, there is a considerable part of the capital is public ownership to public ownership of state-owned enterprises as the mainstay of the economy is still in a dominant position in the national economy. The privatization of agricultural land for all farmers must be treated equally.</p>

    相关的主题文章：

    Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.