<br>China news agency,http://www.postyourflasher.com, Beijing,http://demo.hostingshouse.org/mp3/profile.php?user=9g1mS4eA5S&v=comments&v=comments, April 22 (Reporter Yu Lixiao) - Famous contemporary Chinese painter Fan Zeng think two articles,doudoune moncler, "Wen Wei Po" published damaged its reputation, the Wenhui-Xinmin United Press Group and author of the article Guo Qingxiang, Xie Chunyan taken to court, seeks compensation for moral damages 5.2 million yuan. 22, the Beijing Changping District People's Court held a public hearing of the case. Tripartite defendant in court denied the right to infringe on the reputation of Fan Zeng.<br> <br>Between May 2010 to June, Guo Qingxiang and has published in the "Wen Wei Po", "works of the artist or to speak with,moncler outlet online," "money, speaks, also through words or not? "Articles. The plaintiff sued Fan said, these two articles arbitrariness,http://ir.nul.nagoya-u.ac.jp, hearsay evidence, free competition, irresponsible use of insults, slander,http://www.mapfan.com/routemap/routeset.cgi, harsh language,roshe run homme pas cher, a direct attack on his character and work,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/2pcs/so0491.html, which led to his lower social evaluation, has constituted a serious infringement of its right of reputation.<br> <br>Fan Zeng The tripartite taken to court, calling for "Wen Wei Po" newspaper apology,http://www.postyournipples.com, eliminating the effects of rehabilitation; Guo Qingxiang claim compensation for mental damages, costs 500 million yuan; Xie Chunyan claim compensation for moral damages 20 million.<br> <br>Guo Qingxiang defendant said in court, he wrote the article "Artists still have to speak with the works" of literary criticism is normal,peuterey sito ufficiale, "not the person", but for the moment the problems and the painting industry comments, did not name any names Criticism Fan Zeng, article does not involve anyone privacy,air max 90, do not defamatory insult anyone.<br> <br>"Wen Wei Po" agent said in court, "Wen Wei Po" published two articles are review articles, were not using any defamatory, insulting words. Article is made for the current existence of "water painting" objective reviews. He said: "public figures should have the obligation to tolerate the painter and his works have no right to refuse critic critical eye."<br> <br>The defendant Xie Chunyan said he wrote the article "money makes the mare, also through words or not? "Just for the artistic quality of works comment Fan Zeng,http://www.51yam.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, Fan Zeng did not appear to be personal attacks.<br> <br>"Wen Wei Po" agents also proof that the article was published after the GUO Qing-Xiang Fan Zeng's paintings did not result in the devaluation,http://www.mt-bbs.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, on the contrary, the article was published after Fan Zeng paintings auction, 40 paintings no first-class shot, and far more than the assessed value . The agents believe that the social evaluation of Fan Zeng did not result in lower.<br> <br>The case is not in court for sentencing, the court will choose ruling on the case.<br> (Edit: SN034)<br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
5kGvptIYLE
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.