<p> The main reason for this situation is not public ownership of land, but there are other relevant systems and management deficiencies, especially the land requisition system and compensation system is unreasonable,zanotti femme, imperfect. The solution should deepen the reform of land system, improve relevant systems and regulations and strict law enforcement,chaussure air jordan pas cher, strengthen supervision and management principles and determine a reasonable proportion of land value-added income distribution,Giuseppe Zanotti, really protect landless farmers to be compensated. 5. Chinese farmers lose land privatization will last a support line. Chinese farmers before and after the reform and opening are new Chinese industrialization, urbanization and economic development has made tremendous contributions and sacrifices,moncler italia, and now "three rural" issue prominent, agriculture is still relatively backward, increase farmers' income is low and difficult to compare poverty in rural areas, In this case, the establishment of farmers' social security system should be primarily the responsibility of the government, not long on the land, relying on protection of the farmers themselves. But China has 800 million farmers (including more than 200 million migrant workers), the farmers need the basic social security fund is a huge number, it is difficult to raise them in the short term, not to mention now the government is still limited financial resources,hollister california, so in a unified social security system the case has not yet been established, maintaining public ownership of agricultural land,barbour paris, land that farmers generally do not lose a final support line, making the farmer workers in cities and towns after business failure.</p>
<p> especially in the case of individuals and families themselves can not be guaranteed, it is up to the community to protect. Social security is mainly the responsibility of the government, the government should strive to establish a unified whole society reasonably sound social security system, but in such prior to establishing a sound social security system, people will have to rely first on themselves and their family protection, farmers are able to own or A total of land for protection. Establishment of farmers social security system is largely the responsibility of government, not long on the land, relying on protection of the farmers themselves,piumini peuterey, but in the stage of building a well-off society, the farmers have to rely to a considerable extent on land protection. Land privatization is that farmers risk losing this article can not live without support line.</p>
<p> could have serious adverse consequences. three Whether it is to achieve a reasonable scale operation from land, agricultural modernization, improve the efficiency of land use,abercrombie france, or from clearing land of corruption,giubbotti peuterey, promote the healthy development of industrialization and urbanization,basket louboutin, to solve the "three rural issues" From the fundamental point of view, the privatization of land is not a way out. 1. The land privatization is not necessarily beneficial to the scale of operation and infrastructure. A few years ago, China's rural irrigation infrastructure degradation in many places, not only in disrepair and few new, 30-year eating capital construction of farmland water conservancy infrastructure before the reform and opening up. In recent years,barbour international, the state has increased investment in this area, mainly due to the implementation of the household contract responsibility system, after sub Tiandan dry,barbour femme, collective economic strength has been greatly weakened, and often no interest but also unable to be responsible for public infrastructure.</p>
<p> there is a way out - home farm. When the international financial crisis in 2008,hogan outlet online, tens of millions of migrant workers return, if not to,nike air jordan pas cher, no way out,pigalle louboutin, the consequences would be disastrous! Foreign media predicted that China was going to happen upheaval,giubbino peuterey uomo, results are basically safe. Some scholars believe that protect farmers supposed to be the government's responsibility to farmers to use their land to protect themselves is to "to" land security 'instead of social security, the responsibility of the State to push to farmers. " I think,parajumpers homme, security and social security are two distinct different concepts. Here that the "protection" refers to the social residents (including farmers) life (mainly survival) security, that people daily life, illness and death, weddings and marriage basic needs,tn requin, education, employment, income and other aspects of satisfaction or guarantees, first should by themselves to protect individuals and families, and then the social security.</p>
相关的主题文章：
- http://geesb.com/news/html/?19463.html
- http://pp.papaxiong.net/home.php?mod=space&uid=94036&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=11110060
- http://pp.papaxiong.net/home.php?mod=space&uid=145656&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=11086030
- http://jz.sysoft.cc/news/html/?192728.html
- http://bbs.tt919.com/read.php?tid-293888.html/read.php?tid-293888.html/post.php?fid=326?fid=326
- http://eye.catfood.jp/kousin5/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=40//�?/
- http://www.qupaijie.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=29576
- http://pp.papaxiong.net/home.php?mod=space&uid=138512&do=blog&quickforward=1&id=11110878