<br><br> <br>It has your signature. You forged my signature.<br> <br>Zhang Ye painted<br> <br>Ectopic pregnancy surgery,According to the prosecution allegations, the hospital did not say hello in the case of put salpingectomy, Nanjing Lishui Hu Rongrong public consultation fails to find a hospital, the hospital to court. Preoperative and postoperative hospital said had communication with patients,EGO3bOF5wh, and patients with a signature, but the patient said non-own signature label. By handwriting, the signature was forged. Recently, the court Hospital, Hu Rongrong compensate for the loss of 8 million yuan.<br> <br>Patients: hospitals without the consent of my fallopian tubes cut<br> <br>August 2010, Hu Rongrong found his body some strange, that to "aunt" could not come,the heart is very low self-es, then appeared the symptoms of vaginal bleeding. Hu Rongrong very worried facilitate year on September 15 in the afternoon to the hospital. After the hospital examination, that the likelihood of ectopic pregnancy is large, there is always the risk of bleeding, it is recommended Hu Rongrong quickly hospitalized laparotomy. Condition after doctors communicate with Hu Rongrong, Hu Rongrong expressed understanding of the disease, requiring surgery. On that day, the two sides reached agreement with gynecological surgery patient communication memo, then underwent surgery hospital Hu Rongrong. Surgery, the doctors found the right fallopian tube thickening Hu Rongrong, umbrella blood clots blocking the left ovary increased, then the removal of the right fallopian tube and left Hu Rongrong accessories. The evening of September 27, because Hu Rongrong surgical wound dehiscence, doctors Hu Rongrong was secondary suture.<br> <br>Hu Rongrong said that until then,collane tiffany, she and family members know that the surgery on September 15 in her right fallopian tube, left side of the attachment is removed. In this regard, she and her family are exceptionally angry,Xb1cwGFH9J, they find the hospital to seek explanation. But the hospital insisted that the whole process is in line with medical practice, there is no fault. Because the two sides at loggerheads over the hospital to find the local people's mediation center to coordinate the contradiction between the two sides, but in the end no agreement was reached because the amount of compensation issues, Hu Rongrong party requests compensation 80,000 yuan, but the hospital only agreed to pay a twenty thousand. Hu Rongrong then the hospital to court, that the hospital did not fulfill this obligation lead to surgical error, causing great harm to their physical and mental. "I want a second child. Until now I have not do discharge procedures, my medical card still in the hospital." In the complaint, Hu Rongrong asked the hospital to compensation for the loss of 22,012 yuan for medical expenses, are dependent for living expenses, disability compensation ,moncler outlet, mental injury solatium and other expenses (to be identified later to determine the specific amount) as well as legal costs.<br> <br>Forensic Sciences: Hospital patient forged signature on the memorandum<br> <br>For Hu Rongrong sue, the hospital respondent said Hu Rongrong related to organ removal because of its organ damage occurs undue consequences disease, not the doctor during surgery due to misbehavior. Hospital before surgery, sufficiently informed and obtain consent Hu Rongrong, intraoperative communication with their families, after they communicate with Hu Rongrong by its own signature. Hu Rongrong diagnosis and treatment of all processes are in line with medical practice, without any errors, and did not cause any adverse consequences, Hu Rongrong also healthy and discharged. To prove his claim, the hospital submitted a medical record data, gynecological surgery and doctor-patient communication memo released. So far, all the evidence tends to support the hospital's statement, Hu Rongrong in a very unfavorable situation. However, one copy of the evidence, leading to the emergence of the whole situation very large turn. The evidence is the doctor-patient communication memorandum of September 16. The memo states, the doctor explained the disease, Hu Rongrong expressed understanding and signature confirmation. However, the authenticity of this evidence, Hu Rongrong not recognize, she said, not her signature on the memorandum signed by himself, the hospital forged. In this regard, the hospital has insisted that Hu Rongrong own signature.<br> <br>In order to clarify the fact that the application by the parties,even if the parents can live to be 85 years old, the court commissioned forensic institutions were handwriting, they concluded that: "Hu Rongrong" signature handwriting and handwriting samples tend to think not written by the same person. This conclusion means that the signature on the memo line Hu Rongrong hospital side forged. Identification of the conclusions of this part, the hospital side said they did not recognize, "Hu Rongrong signature on September 16 is not approved for signature before the surgery she recognized. Commission identified the signature on September 16, and Hu Rongrong the samples are she offered no signature on September 15, September 16 for comparison because Hu Rongrong signing on September 15 is the preoperative,we have applied for a car with the government, was sitting on the desk signature, and September 16 The signature is in the post-operative sleep on the bed writing, signed by the environment is not the same position twice, it will lead to the signature of the difference between the two. Our treatment process without any fault, requesting the court shall dismiss the other's claims. "<br> <br>Court: hospitals have misjudged their compensation 80,000<br> <br>"You kept saying that inform, but in fact you did not inform, and that this is not the reason to inform and no exemption, because Hu Rongrong did not appear imminent danger, surgery, her husband has been in the operating room door, Doctors told Hu Rongrong fully qualified and their families, if the hospital found that the right fallopian tube and left attachment lesions can be quickly frozen sections, but the hospital did not do slices. "Hu Rongrong's attorney that the hospital violated the normal diagnostic and treatment practices, because clearly defined clinical diagnostic criteria, salpingectomy indications is bleeding and shock,collane tiffany,should not be liable for dama, tumor Hu Rongrong left attachment of 6 cm or less in accordance with the provisions need not be removed, and that also provides diagnostic and treatment practices such surgery if there is no menopause for women, To obtain the consent of patients, these hospitals did not do it. The hospital in knowing violation of informed consent when their own rights, is still surgery the next morning Hu Rongrong forged signatures, should compensate for the damage they caused to Hu Rongrong.<br> <br>Subsequently, the court commissioned forensic institutions for Hu Rongrong disability rating and other matters were identified. After identification, Hu Rongrong line right fallopian tube resection, left attachment resection constitute seven disability. The court found that hospital patients need to be found when Hu Rongrong organ resection, did not fulfill the necessary obligations to inform their families Hu Rongrong, Hu Rongrong deprived of the right to decide the choice of treatment programs and physical integrity, Hu Rongrong constitute seven disability caused damage as a result of. By handwriting, the hospital after surgery fake hospital patient communication memorandum signature, are obviously inappropriate, so the effects of damage to Hu Rongrong hospital should bear the full liability. For Hu Rongrong advocates are dependent for living expenses,They reach out and touch the , comprehensive Hu Rongrong injury and surgery type,moncler outlet, its ability to work the extent of damage is not obvious, so the Hu Rongrong not support this request. After calculation, the court Hospital,canada goose femme, Hu Rongrong compensation disability compensation, mental damages, the total amount of compensation for damages for medical expenses 84,752 yuan. (Paper party pseudonym)<br> <br>Correspondent Li River Law<br> <br>Yangzi Evening News reporter Luo Shuangjiang<br> Share: welcome to comment I want to comment microblogging Recommended | hot microblogging today<br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
hospitals have misjudged their compensation 80
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.