"I was driving the vehicle at the vehicle lane

DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

"I was driving the vehicle at the vehicle lane

(1 post)

Started 10 years ago by hjsab56007

Tags:

hjsab56007
Member

 Chengdu Chinese Commercial News reporter Zhang Bingyao Car 40% liability ye identified Second instance court found that "Jetta car when cornering, no road non-motorized fulfilled within a reasonable duty of care." "Although it is impossible to confirm the identification of Justice whether the two vehicles contact, but can confirm that in the event of accidents, Jetta cars and horse distance Very close. During this short distance electric horse fell to the ground will be affected oncoming vehicle. Therefore, electric horse fell to the ground and there is a causal relationship between the Jetta. " 15 million yuan compensation counted out loud noise The Court confirmed that the driver of a small river horse power for the loss of more than 19 million. And because the Jetta has been off to pay high insurance protection, the Jetta driver Rowe required to compensate 120,450 yuan a small river in the cross-strong insurance liability limit, then the remaining more than 70,000 yuan and then bear 40%. The total amount of compensation more than 150,000 yuan. November 2, 2013, with the Cheng Huang Sec Jinniu Jiefang East Lane junction with the road accident. When he was 18-year-old riding a river about electric horse roses, pour in the front right side of the Jetta sedan, the accident caused a small river nine disabled. Over the past two years, this accident after the first trial, the second trial after a few days ago, the High Court has issued a formal notice of acceptance of the civil case for retrial, the case will enter the retrial process. Special is that this accident, forensic results can not be determined electric horse and Jetta have been in contact. For this play can not determine whether the contact accident, first instance court found no fault Jetta party without bear responsibility. Court of second instance is found, Jetta party bear secondary responsibility, the need for compensation of 15 million yuan a small river. Event Playback Electric horse fell in front of the Jetta can not prove that the two vehicles contact At 13:50 on November 2, 2013 Xu, public Rowe driving a Jetta sedan, traveling along the Ring Road, Sec direction Jiefang Gate Bridge from the north direction,scarpe hogan, to probe into the intersection of East Lane, in the light is green When the left turn lane to enter the front by a small bus lane. At the same time, a small river driving electric horse along the Ring Road, Sec Jiefang Gate Bridge north direction in the right direction bus lane road entering the intersection. Eventually,hogan outlet, the two cars in the road with the case of the bus. Rowe brake brakes to stop at a small river electric horse in the front right side of the Jetta sedan fall. After the incident, a small river was quickly rushed to hospital. 143 days after the treatment, medical expenses spent about 60,000 yuan. Among them, Mr. Rowe pad pay 16,900 yuan for medical expenses. Last April 18,http://monsteressays.com, was identified, a small river constitute nine disabled. Including disability compensation,http://www50.atwiki.jp/mmbrazil/contact, etc., the court finally confirmed, this traffic accident, the loss of a small river of 19 million yuan. For that from road traffic accidents, Municipal Traffic Management Bureau issued two branch road traffic accidents proved clear, the existing evidence does not prove that the two vehicles come into contact, can not determine the parties responsible. Identification of Sichuan Ding Cheng's Forensic, said: "can not determine whether the Jetta sedan and electric horse had contact occurred." Why such a sentence,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/lens-deli/5-fairyq-ari.html? First Instance: car not bear responsibility Cause: Unable to prove the existence of illegal behavior left Jetta cars, horse then seize the motor vehicle lanes and other irregularities exist After fruitless negotiations, a small river to the Jinniu District Court prosecution request for compensation. The trial, a small river,louboutin femme, said he was observed in 20 meters outside the Jetta at the intersection turn left,http://www.railroadpix.com, "not to let themselves go straight to traffic turning left when the Jetta sedan, should take full responsibility." Mr Lo said that was not his own horse power The hit, "I was driving the vehicle at the vehicle lane, intersection indicator shows a green light after the fight started after the lights turn left turn vehicle into the bus lane just started, when the rear is still small lane when you see the electric horse coming fast. I stopped on the brakes. electric horse was also Jicha, but not stopped it down in my car in front of the front wheels. " Ultimately, the Court of First Instance finds that, according to available evidence, can not prove the existence of illegal behavior Jetta car at the intersection turn left. On the contrary, there is horse power motor vehicle lanes and other irregularities seize. "The plaintiff said that in about 20 meters away already observed Jetta left turn,http://acneshoponline.com, according to the normal function of the electric car is fully capable of normal speed or slow amble avoid brake to avoid the accident." The court found the Jetta sedan assumes responsibility for the accident. Second instance: the car need bear 40% secondary responsibility Reason: Jetta did not do to a reasonable duty of care; two vehicles very close, electric horse fell to the ground vehicle impact is bound to be coming,http://my.5754.cn/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, so electric horse fell to the ground and there is a causal relationship Jetta Second trial Neither submit new evidence. However, judgment is required to bear 40% of Jetta secondary liability, "Jetta when cornering, no non-motorized road fulfilled within a reasonable duty of care,http://www.q8788.com/read.php?tid=102, so that the Jetta is not enough time in the process of moving to electric horse with children of pre-sentence and to respond. "" Although it is impossible to confirm the identification of Justice whether the two vehicles touch. But the two sides describe the parties and the traffic police team investigating the accident material point of view, it was confirmed that in the event of accidents, Jetta cars and horse children very close. During this short distance electric horse fell to the ground will be affected oncoming vehicle. Therefore, electric horse fell to the ground and there is a causal relationship between the Jetta. " Why pay so much? Jetta has de Paul, the need for compensation in cross-strong insurance liability limit, the remaining 40% loss and then worry Since the time of the incident Jetta pay high insurance has been off Paul, according to Road Exchange Act of judicial interpretation, "not legally insured to pay compulsory insurance of motor vehicle traffic accidents causing damage,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/gion/dh-gmhd14e15dr.html, the parties request the insured obligation to make compensation in cross-strong insurance liability limit, the people's court should be supported . "Accordingly, Mr. Rowe small river in addition to the need for compensation to pay high insurance within the range of 120,450 yuan, the remaining 70,louboutin femme,000 yuan and then bear 40%. The total amount of compensation more than 150,000 yuan. Because of the second trial refused to accept Mr. Rowe for retrial. Recently, the High Court to respond, the case has officially entered the retrial process. sound Road liability cases involving border issues In addition to the contact can not be determined, the case is another focal point for the Jetta sedan driving process, in addition to pay high insurance escape outside, and there is no other traffic violation. And to pay high insurance liability adjustment escape an administrative category, and in this case no causal relationship tort liability. Therefore, when the court of second instance and ultimately implement attribution in whether to make reasonable avoid duty above. Lo retrial stage agent, Sichuan Heng and letter Lawyer said that under the direction of Jetta car at the traffic lights turn left in the driveway, there is no fault. Jetta saw electric horse coming, take the initiative to drive their own car stop, and no fault. "This accident, should belong to a unilateral accidents, electrical accidents do not belong to the two sides between horse and Jetta." Therefore, Qiu Wenfeng said that the greatest significance of the case is that it involves a responsibility to identify the boundary road, where is the question "If the responsibility for expansion without borders, every traffic participants may all feel uneasy. Even though he has done as much as possible according to the law to drive in accordance with regulations." Accidents are not We are in contact with the premise collision An unnamed judge said that in real life is often easy to form a misunderstanding, that is the formation of traffic accidents are required to contact the collision as a precondition, "but in fact, as long as the vehicles on the road due to the fault or accident others personal injury, also constitutes a traffic accident. However,woolrich outlet, the responsibility conclude that there must be based on whether the fault, the fault of the size to be determined. " 

Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.