<br>(Reporter Pei Xiaolan) yesterday, is called "the first civil antitrust case" "LiFangPing lawyer to sue Beijing Netcom does not give foreigners preferential case" in the Second City Court trial. Because Beijing Netcom made a case involving trade secrets, the court is not a public hearing.<br> <br>14:00 yesterday,http://by.qee.jp/cgi_kuyo/bbsk20/joyful.cgi, Li Fangping and its appointed lawyer Liu Xiaoyuan came to the Second City Court second trial area. August 1 last year after the implementation of anti-monopoly law, namely LiFangPing sued,moncler outlet milano, saying under Beijing Netcom "customer service contract", because he did not Beijing accounts,moncler Outlet, if you do not apply the appropriate security procedures, in Beijing Netcom reported loading landlines only select the "prepaid services", the corresponding public have Beijing accounts can apply for the "post-paid business." And said the two businesses have considerable differences in a series of tariff concessions activities, such as he can not handle many discount packages of "Family 1+" business. The case was accepted Chaoyang Court in September last year, about a month after the transfer to the Second City Court.<br> <br>LiFangPing that Beijing Netcom with its absolute monopoly status in the Beijing area,hogan outlet, for prepaid users implement differential treatment,http://sibsolidarnost.ru/index.php?option=com_xijc&view=captcha, contrary to the fair, equivalent to civil law principle of good faith, but also in line with the AML Article 17, paragraph 6,http://r-cube.ritsumei.ac.jp, of monopolistic behavior, that "There is no justification for the same conditions of the transaction relative to the differential treatment of people on the trading price and other terms of the transaction." LiFangPing sued for illegal confirm Beijing Netcom, Beijing Netcom accept the decree for "Family 1+" business applications,http://www.021jx.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=33241, and compensation for 1 yuan.<br> <br>Last November 6, Beijing Netcom pleadings submitted to the court, said the reason why the software platform upgrade engineered technology limitations, "Family 1+" business only after paying platform, and Beijing Netcom reason why after applying paid service Users make household registration installation conditions, it is safe from the business point of view, not inappropriate, but not illegal. Because LiFangPing signed a service agreement with Beijing Netcom is in March 2007,http://mizu-masa.sakura.ne.jp/yokkaichi/movie/sunbbs2/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=2014&page=2, was not implemented anti-monopoly law, confirmed that the agreement is illegal is not applicable antitrust laws, I hope the court rejected all appeals LiFangPing.<br> <br>LiFangPing appointed lawyer Liu Xiaoyuan told reporters yesterday the trial, Beijing Netcom basic stick above the respondent comments and stressed that it has no monopoly, no consumer discrimination. Beijing Netcom pointed out that from January 1 this year began,http://yuzukko.room.ne.jp/~yuzuou/okuruuta/yybbs.cgi, not Beijing accounts for foreign users, after paying a 500 yuan stored calls,louboutin pas cher,http://www.usrcyclisme.fr, too, can apply for paid services and "Family 1+" business. In this regard,nike tn pas cher, Liu Xiaoyuan believes that this change in the premise or discrimination, "There are people you do not need Beijing accounts stored calls, the company's service should not be to the account as a basis for discrimination."<br> <br>Yesterday,http://www.goti-death.com/ayane/BBS/apeboard_plus.cgi/http://www.goti-death.com/ayane/BBS/apeboard_plus.cgi/, the trial proceeds to 16:30, the case is not in court for sentencing.<br> <br>Related reading:<br><br>Beijing Netcom alleged violations of antitrust official filing<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
YYJP2NWCCv
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.