The Beijing News « DavidCadogan.ca Forums

DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

The Beijing News

(1 post)

Started 10 years ago by v8nS6Aq3Sd

Tags:

v8nS6Aq3Sd
Member

 The Beijing News (Reporter Liu Yang) pilot candidates Xiaogang (a pseudonym) brush at the final hurdle after examination. He believes that record is rejected because he is "Hepatitis B carriers", the Beijing Capital Airlines Limited (inaugural) to court, that the other side exists discrimination in employment, and ask for a public apology, paid 50,000 yuan for mental damages. Recently, the case in Shunyi Court of First Instance hearing, the defendant refused to record Xiaogang said the reason is that the plaintiff failed intelligence test scores, not because it is "hepatitis B carriers." plaintiff Illegal search defendant "HBV" For fear of exposure to privacy, Xiaogang did not appear in court, his agent,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/ebest-dvd/0000001114305.html, attended the hearing. The defendant as "cadet" details concerning grounds of commercial confidentiality does not apply for a public hearing, the Court has not been supported. The plaintiff said that in September 2011,doudoune moncler pas cher,http://www.mysignup.com/cgi-bin/view.cgi, Xiaogang information submitted candidates, candidates inaugural pilots. After the interview, the initial inspection,air max 90 pas cher, etc.,moncler Outlet, when in November, received "through the interview," As a result,http://www.ac-grenoble.fr/ecole/74/ewues1.cluses/spip.php?article554, placed Beijing Civil Aviation General Hospital medical examination. A few days later,http://303310.com/thread-156499-1-1.html, he received notice that his examination showed as "hepatitis B surface antigen positive" (ie, carriers of the hepatitis B virus), the defendant decided not recruiting. The plaintiff that the defendant's conduct is not only a violation of the plaintiff medical HBV markers, but also because the plaintiffs are hepatitis B virus carriers refusing to employ. The defendant's conduct violated the plaintiff's right to equal employment, employment discrimination practiced against hepatitis B virus carriers, affecting the plaintiff life and employment confidence. So, he sued the defendant a public apology,http://www.dukeint.co.jp, compensation for moral damages and 50,http://www.njhxny.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2069712&fromuid=16320,000 yuan tolls and so on. defendant Check the items not set The defendant said the agent, the defendant did not detect violations, the company just as the candidates undergo a medical examination in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Aviation Pilots and the Ministry of Health, which checks the project, location,hogan outlet online, time according to the relevant requirements of the Civil Aviation Authority. Plaintiff's intelligence test score of 28 points, 30 points away from qualifying score difference,http://66.154.116.54, the interviewer does not pass a decision by a comprehensive assessment. Therefore, the plaintiffs were not hired,http://www.m-pep.org/spip.php?article4038, not because the test results of hepatitis B markers. In this process, the fact that there is no infringement defendant. So, I hope the court dismissed the plaintiff appeals. Argument against the defendant, the plaintiffs objected: "The plaintiff passed the interview and initial inspection included all aspects of intelligence test, was the notification examination, otherwise the defendant to the plaintiff is not lawful comprehensive physical examination." The original defendant, the parties do not agree to mediation, the case was not in court for sentencing. ■ focus of the trial Why the candidates refused entries? When the trial in this case, the focus of dispute between the parties is whether the plaintiff was eliminated due to any reason. Plaintiff submitted three sections court record. In which a recording medium, a Zhao Xing Nvzi said, Xiaogang "The reason does not pass the hepatitis B surface antigen positive,piumini woolrich, the other measured the results are qualified." The defendant said that the recording of the Zhao is not the maiden voyage of employees, but the defendant commissioned site staff recruitment. Judge accused in court repeatedly asked: "Suppose that all examination candidates meet the requirements, just examination results of hepatitis B surface antigen positive this one does not meet the requirements, the defendant will be recruiting you?" The defendant replied: "The airlines themselves will not refuse to hire because of this one." The plaintiff admitted that Zhao Xiaogang has been in the recruitment contacts, a recruitment site for employees. (Original title: Pilot rejected candidates called because hepatitis B discrimination) (Edit: SN017) 

Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.