<br>Zhang set up a private drug rehabilitation centers in the home, at which drug to Lee, the two sides signed a "security agreement", Lee also paid 20,000 yuan to buy detoxification drugs. Out that soon, Lee relapse again. "Detoxification unsuccessful," security agreement "is fraudulent Zhang used to sell drugs." Lee Zhang court will request a refund of 20,000 yuan drug money. Recently,woolrich parka, the court ruling on the case.<br> <br>Lee said the plaintiff, last September 22, he went to the old city area of Yunnan Province Zhang sardines "personal addiction treatment center" detoxification, and detoxification and Zhang signed a "security agreement", Protocol 8 agreement: detoxification patients 15-20 days drug treatment, after the first medication,http://www.tushen.net/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1576, drug detoxification pay costs 20,000 yuan, if not successful withdrawal,http://bbs.whxphoto.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=20560, Fenwenbuqu refund 20,nike tn pas cher,http://cjdc.cc/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=55401,000 yuan. After the agreement is signed, Zhang paid 20,000 yuan drug money to buy the drug drug use, drug played a role, and soon, Lee left the Zhang family. Available March 14 this year, Lee has relapse drugs, and because of drug use in Jinping County public security authorities arrested and sent to the forced isolation treatment Honghe Prefecture.<br> <br>Later, Lee will be Zhang court. On the court, Lee's agent that the defendant did not obtain gainful detoxification services related qualification certificates and business licenses to engage in paid detoxification services,http://marvelous21.sakura.ne.jp/enkaijoh/light.cgi?res=308, its illegal. Secondly, the use of cure when the defendant under the guise of using fraudulent means to sign a "security agreement" with Lee. "We are asking the court to revoke this" security agreement ", order the defendant to refund the fees charged 20,000 yuan detoxification, and assume the case costs."<br> <br>And Zhang argued that Lee is voluntary drug to its place,air max femme pas cher, "security agreement" signed by both parties has indicated drug-related matters, the plaintiff in his residence after detoxification week, due to family problems,http://www.serow250.com, with 15 days of medicine left . Thereafter, the accuser's mother had called his son on the phone has been successfully rehab to cure his disease. "I have long been engaged in civil detoxification, only charge the cost or free, there has been no publicity and gainful treatment services. I sold the drug product is a pure Chinese medicine, is in line with national standards."<br> <br>The Court held that "security agreement" signed between Lee and Zhang are based drug rehabilitation contract under the plaintiff, the defendant in the case entered into drug treatment services. Although drug control is a shared responsibility of the whole society,http://www.matsue-yado.com/otoku/clip.cgi??, the state encourages scientific and technological research Narcotics, promotion of advanced detoxification methods,http://www.tukipie.net/camera/index.cgi, but the contract must be established by law drug to take effect. "Zhang carried out in the absence of relevant state departments approved the rehabilitation of medical services,air max femme pas cher, and signed with the plaintiff Lee" security agreement "constitutes a breach of the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations of conclusion of the contract, so the original contract signed by both parties accused invalid, are not legally binding for detoxification drug did not obtain approval of the text of the State Food and Drug Administration. "In summary, the court Lee and Zhang signed a" security agreement "is invalid by Zhang returned Lee 20,Piumini moncler outlet,Silva" target="_blank" style="text-decoration: none;">http://vegalta7.s156.xrea.com/aska/aska.cgi/360/1/>Silva,000 yuan. (Kunming Daily correspondent, chief reporter Lei Tung Ching Ting)<br> <br>& Nbsp;<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
f2xps8CeVJ
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.