<br>Carrying 60,000 yuan deposit disappeared<br> <br>□ reporter martial arts<br> <br>WASHINGTON Terrace Housing Demolition Co. Hohhot Hohhot TEDA house demolition to the limited liability company paid a $ 60,000 deposit demolition, the demolition contract, mended to charge a deposit of Hohhot TEDA house demolition limited liability company even from human "evaporate." After being taken Hohhot Terrace housing demolition Limited anger will Hohhot TEDA house demolition to Hohhot limited liability company to a new District People's Court, won the case. This is a reporter yesterday learned information.<br> <br>It is understood, March 11, 2008, the plaintiff Hohhot Terrace housing demolition Limited and the defendant Hohhot TEDA house demolition Co., Ltd. signed a "commission demolition contract", commissioned by the plaintiff to the defendant agreed to Hohhot food factory dormitory Party regulations buildings and ancillary facilities will be dismantled within the range.<br> <br>November 10, 2008, the defendant expressly agreed in the contract in addition to the removal of deposit 20,000 yuan in full charge, also charged 40,000 yuan removal fee and security deposit to the plaintiff, its representative Xi whole silver write receipt. After the defendant be charged a total of 60,http://androg.seesaa.net,000 yuan deposit, but all kinds of excuses not to the plaintiff started slow, dragged, and finally trying to shift the site of the office also moved,woolrich sito ufficiale, Xi whole silver also could not be contacted. After understanding the multi-plaintiff, the defendant did not have the mandate and authority of this demolition. After know fooled, September 8, 2010, Hohhot Terrace Housing Demolition Co. sued New District People's Court,moncler soldes, requesting the court shall order the defendant Hohhot limited liability company TEDA house demolition demolition double the return of the plaintiff 40,http://www.yashima-tanuki.net/cgi-bin/tkbbs1/tkbbs1.pl?page_num=1]?????????????????????????????,000 yuan deposit demolition charges and deposit deadline for the return of the plaintiff charged 40,000 yuan,nike tn, 4,322 yuan to pay interest on the loan over the same period.<br> <br>New District People's Court accepted the case, according to the hearing in public. The court held that: the plaintiff and defendant signed the "commission demolition contract" is a voluntary act of the parties, the parties shall perform in accordance with the contents of the contract. The plaintiff paid the defendant demolition by about fees and margin 60,000 yuan,piumini woolrich outlet,http://freeworld.webcrow.jp/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=15366072, to fulfill the contractual obligations. However,http://www.hiyou360.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=98320, the defendant was charged after the plaintiff's expense, not according to the contract the houses will be demolished to the plaintiff, in violation of the contract, it shall bear the liability, to compensate the plaintiff corresponding economic loss. The plaintiff agreed in the contract as the removal of 20,000 yuan deposit, requiring the defendant to double the return,http://www.postyourasian.com, but the contract is $ 20,000 bond or cleared land use fee agreement is not clear, and no other evidence to support the plaintiffs their claims,http://bowling.s52.xrea.com/i/epad/epad.cgi?res=7800, and therefore the plaintiffs request the margin is less than double the return of the evidence, the other plaintiff requests the court to support.<br> <br>In accordance with the relevant provisions of "People's Republic of China Contract Law", December 6, 2010,woolrich parka,http://w.xyiyi.com/news/html/?43931.html, the new District People's Court ruled that the defendant Hohhot TEDA house demolition limited liability company to return the plaintiff Hohhot Terrace Housing Demolition Ltd demolition costs 60,000 yuan,she" target="_blank" style="text-decoration: none;">http://maximum.room.ne.jp/bbs/yami/yybbs.cgi/http>she, to pay the plaintiff interest on bank loan losses over the same period 4322 yuan, 954 yuan case acceptance fee borne by the defendant.<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
September 8
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.