<p> the text of a Tsinghua University "days of arrogant woman" simply because the identity of women, from the outset it was part of the employer to exclude it from consideration. Employment gender discrimination overtly or covertly, in society seems to be spreading, and even became a certain degree of "convention" that women are suffering in a job search, only reluctantly grown accustomed to. Some people may question the court's decision interfered with the employment of free enterprise, after all, most companies know what kind of talent they need, both true respect for market selection, so that enterprises prefer men from the economic optimum angle,hogan roma, what is wrong? Such specious excuse really. Objective differences exist between men and women physiological structure, but this does not generally constitute grounds for female employment disadvantage. Indeed, there are some such reality miners, loggers, firefighters and other unsuitable because of the special nature of women in the profession, but in areas such as etiquette empathy, care and other men are rarely involved. However, in the more modern economic structure created by the out of the white-collar occupations, the "brains" instead of "muscle" is the determining factor, there is no significant gap between men and women which, so then set the threshold for women is a kind of gender discrimination. Throughout today's job market, "threshold" reasonable differences from less, and more from unreasonable discrimination. If the recruitment is not the beginning of the study of women included in the vision, essentially equal opportunities between the sexes in the destruction of employment, so women will not be faced with how to stand out from the competition in question, but there are not eligible to participate in the issue of competition - - and this qualification is a constitutional law gives every individual's fundamental rights. This is like the playground in the competition.</p>
<p> not touch "car owners' interests. In some parts of the government blocked the issue, the government's priority to convenience, rather than the fairness and effectiveness of the system. So the idea is basically blocking rule: a, bus and private car, the first thought limit private cars; Second, local cars and foreign cars, Priority think of limiting foreign cars; Third, limited number or limited license, limited license preferred. Although the current car limited license to facilitate the government in the long term and realistic look, but it undermines the economic and social development. Automotive industry is still one of China's pillar industries.</p>
<p> limited license directly undermine the pillars of the status of the industry, many important related industries and consumption chain have a ripple effect, consumption, employment, auto repair industry, steel industry, etc. will decline, these It will be directly reflected in the decline in the GDP figures. In some parts of the problem is easy to deal with extremes GDP: GDP is from the past is the only all look GDP figures, as long as the GDP go up, developing what industry, how much environmental damage, how much damage can be ignored. Of GDP in reflection and adjustment, the emergence of another kind of extreme views, is the nothingness of GDP, from "only GDP" slide "anti GDP". Although GDP has many drawbacks, but still the most important index to reflect the current economic development, it is not an option, behind the numbers can not be ignored jobs. GDP growth by one percentage point each, it will pull millions of jobs. The automotive industry as a pillar industry shrinking, is visible behind the disappearance of jobs. Rule blocking is important, but the government blocked the process, the need to take into account the limited license to bring the chain reaction. As representative bodies, local people's congresses need to stand in the position of the public interest, some local governments to curb the arbitrary licensing restrictions. (Original title: Congress can not condone government arbitrarily limitedVideo loading, please wait .. AutoPlay & nbsp; play sexism ills which female students play forward or backward in the candidates was discriminatory � companies can have a cost-conscious economic accounts.</p>
<p> if it is as good as others since when convinced, but if at first no stand on the same starting line, and even never even qualified to stand on the same track, the so-called "freedom" on nothing but wanton presumptuous of a fig leaf. "No remedy is no right," the court's decision is a clear signal that the rights written on paper does not mean just look bluffing "paper tiger." Enterprises can have a cost-conscious economic accounts, but the state can not be vague account of their rights.</p>
<p> but the state can not be vague account of their rights, legal account in the maintenance of social value and opportunity equality. Recently, Hangzhou Xihu District People's Court Xiao Huang v. Female College recruiters unreasonably "limited recruit male" constitute employment discrimination case won. It is this verdict, declared the constitution unambiguous gender equality, labor law prohibiting sex discrimination in employment in black and white, these fundamental rights is not just a nice slogan. However, this is also from the media dubbed "the first case of sex discrimination in employment, Zhejiang," the rise rights, fair employment again in recent years, pain onto the table. Last winter, a "job Oh, please do not we get in the door", aroused strong resonance female students in colleges and universities in the country.</p>
相关的主题文章:
- http://0zk1.cn/news/html/?24649.html
- http://kaito1412.com/kid/bbs/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=viewres&target=801162/
- http://www.china-bygc.com:8071/news/html/?101776.html
- http://sjh.bbs.windplay.cn/forum-53-1.html?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=
- http://211.86.128.2/gjjl/Review.asp?NewsID=595
- http://mm.kaiye.la/plus/feedback.php?aid=37
- http://eye.catfood.jp/kousin5/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=40/�Kenapa/
- http://bbs.1277yx.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=1037