DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

scarpe hogan outlet " the vindication of two passwords

(1 post)
  • Started 10 years ago by d3i221izsrp

Tags:


  1. d3i221izsrp
    Member

    <p>" It is extremely rare low-probability event, in our country is well-known public cases are: Case of She Hubei, Henan Zhao Zuohai case and so on. "Murderers" reproduction,hogan 2015, often together can become rehabilitated injustice decisive factor. However, the case of Nie Shubin Hebei, Inner Mongolia and Huugjilt pattern, when the "murderers" to emerge, despite surging public opinion, to review for many years still no clear conclusion. This year, in the implementation of the new Criminal Procedure Law and the central emphasis on "individual justice" in the background, more than vindicated old injustice and correct the wrong case, there were still more than a major mystery is reviewed, pending. The court system also expanded to reflect top-down, Shen Yong, executive vice president of the Supreme Court of the pro-essays, "How should we guard against miscarriages of justice," spread far and wide. Concern that Beijing Chang Lin Feng case, Henan Li Huailiang case, Fuqing Commission for Discipline Inspection and other bombings case acquittals, is considered to break the "Chinese-style miscarriage of justice," the vindication of two passwords: "murderers reproduction" or "returned from the dead "Implementing the Criminal Procedure Law had clearly" the Conflict "judicial philosophy. "Li Huailiang style" Correction April 25, Pingdingshan Intermediate People's Court sentenced Li Huailiang guilty. Lee's lawyer Mr Patrick Wong noted that the sentencing court, four prosecutors absent. It is reported that the public prosecutor in the court acquitted after I heard the news.</p>

    <p> and timely investigation and come out and acquitted, either for himself or for public confidence in the administration of justice is concerned, it will be less damage. " "This time, we take the initiative to set off this 'bomb'." Zhang Yong said, has always been seen as vindication of injustice scandal of the Court, however, the value of case that "the Conflict" to implement the concept of justice, sense of shame and then courage, Or is it to strengthen the "presumption of innocence" another opportunity in the judiciary. According to media reports, since Zhao Zuohai case, the Court of Henan Province, three facts are unclear, evidence insufficient to hear more cases in accordance with law, shall be declared hundreds defendant guilty. Evidence "black hole" Criminal cases into doubt, and eventually link to redress in the courts, are derived from facts are unclear, insufficient evidence. In an interview with reporters more than injustice wrong cases.</p>

    <p> collective retire. May 8, Pingdingshan Municipal People's Procuratorate informed that the results for Li Huailiang innocence, prosecutors believe implement the "the Conflict" judicial philosophy, and therefore respect the verdict, decided not to protest. For the prosecution, it was a tough decision. According to reports, after acquittal, the prosecution enormous pressure on whether to protest, Pingdingshan's Procuratorate to make the biggest fight possible, several prosecutors night work, in order to find sufficient grounds to draw the protest, eventually, Henan Province People's Procuratorate shall not protest guidance. In Henan, Li Huailiang case is considered to get rid of the "Chinese-style miscarriage of justice," the vindication of two passwords: "murderers reproduction" or "Return of the Dead", to implement the Criminal Procedure Law had clearly "the Conflict" judicial philosophy. For case, Henan Provincial High Court president HUBER Reflection Road, Pingdingshan Intermediate People's Court in May 2007 requested case back after investigation, has not issued a formal legal instrument, resulting in cases of long-term stay in the court session, "if we Zhao Zuohai After misjudged cases occurred in big investigation, major corrective activity was carried out.</p>

    <p> such as Zhao Zuohai case, case, Zhang's nephew case, bombings and other Fuqing Commission for Discipline Inspection, the reason the court initially convicted are "basic facts clear, the evidence irrefutable basic" (referred to as "two basic "). This "two basic" settle a lawsuit the concept began in the early 1980s, and in the subsequent criminal trial to be widely used, especially prevalent in several crackdown. In the judiciary and academia, "two basic" has been controversial. Experienced many incidents of injustice defense counsel that the "two basic" is not a legal concept, the law has never been such a statement, from 79 to 97 CPL CPL to the implementation of the new Criminal Procedure Law this year.</p>
    相关的主题文章：

    Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.