<br>Beijing Times (Reporter Sun Siya) because of that the Construction Committee lax review, so that their marital property into a jointly owned property, Mr. Ma will live Construction Committee to court, and his wife added as a third case,http://www.postyourflasher.com, requesting Undo the two now co-owned property real estate license. Yesterday, reporters learned, Changping District Court hearing of the case.<br> <br>Ma, 48, is divorcing his wife, he will be the Beijing Municipal Commission of Housing and Urban sue Changping District Court. Ma claims, June 17, 2009, he paid 150,http://www.ynhjfc.com/bbs/read.php?tid=140381,000 down payment, bought a town located in Changping District, South of a house. By the end of June,http://www.masologne.org/spip.php?article176, he and Lee registration of marriage. After marriage,doudoune moncler,http://montpel-libre.fr/spip.php?article2426/, husband and wife Lee use, in the process of housing network to sign and registration procedures, forgery total agreement,http://www.fp21.cn/news/html/?89868.html, the house is registered as a total of two and a half and 50% share. Municipal Construction Committee reviewed the application materials submitted by Ms. Lee, eventually housing all warrants issued.<br> <br>Ma believes Construction Committee carefully reviewed the application for registration no identity,hogan outlet, he did not obtain the consent of premarital buy houses will be registered as matrimonial, it is clearly wrong. "All things are she signed, I did not sign over power of attorney is forged her." Ma said.<br> <br>On the court, Ms. Lee recalled, July 30, 2009, she took her husband's attorney wrote Ma,http://115.28.5.85/discuz!/viewthread.php?tid=75546&extra=, to live Construction Committee for the relevant house transfer procedures,louboutin outlet, materials and there are still a total submission agreement,moncler outlet, agreed the house is The two sides common property, and signed by both parties.<br> <br>Tripartite uncompromising, the case is no court verdict.<br> <br>& Gt,https://eetdpubs.lbl.gov/search/node/; & gt; The defendant claims<br> <br> <br> <br>Municipal Construction Committee according to regulations without fault<br> <br>Municipal Construction Committee told the court that the registration authority for application materials were reviewed and found to comply with the relevant provisions of the Housing transfer of registration of property, were legal and valid registration, the legitimate rights and interests of Mr. Ma is not compromised, should be maintained. Municipal Construction Committee said that they are handled in accordance with normal procedures, there is no fault.<br> <br>Lee agreed to jointly owned property before marriage<br> <br>On the court, Lee said the two men are being divorced,http://www.ifengbj.com/service/feedback_look.php?id=19451, have this property disputes. Before marriage, both sides say good housing for the common property, "Now he is vexatious,moncler femme, do not want to put 50% of the house to me." Ms. Lee said, if not the 50% home ownership, then I would not marry him.<br> <br>(Original title: Men sue for rescission of real estate license Construction Committee)<br> (Edit: SN123)<br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
the case is no court verdict.
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.