<br>(Reporter Guo Yuhong) "live to see people die to see the corpse,http://notreleben.com/spip.php?article5, evidence? I was the victim!" January 8, much public attention, Fan Siu Yan Jinchang Personnel Yellow River twists and turns throwing child case was underway. After the verdicts that "the sentence too light" Fan Siu Yan changed his mind, a lawyer with "sentencing abnormal weight" as an excuse to Lanzhou City Intermediate People's Court of Appeal, he believes the facts on the part of the Court of First Instance finds discrepancies, criminal consequences It is not clear, requesting the court commuted the law, to make their own sentences.<br> <br>39-year-old former Jinchang Jinchuan District Personnel Bureau cadres Fan Siu Yan, face 12-year-old son of a family of their own remarriage hostile interference can not do anything. In four cried to no avail, the unbearable mental torture to seek ways to solve the pressure he was actually the son thrown into the Yellow River personally subsequently jumped into the river. Fortunately,http://www.postyourasian.com, after Fan Siu Yan survived into the Public Security Bureau gave himself up,http://www.wushengyuanchem-1507143.adminkc.cn,roshe run femme pas cher,http://eye.catfood.jp/kousin5/apeboard_plus.cgi?command=read_message&msgnum=40/"/, but the child is still missing.<br> <br>December 30, 2009, Fan Siu Yan found guilty of intentional homicide, is Lanzhou Court of First Instance sentenced to life imprisonment and deprived of political rights for life. After the verdicts,tiffany gioielli, Fan Siu Yan's wife Liu flutter in the stall crying "Zhao Yan, appeal ah!" Fan Siu Yan in the detention room,moncler pas cher, but claiming to be "too light a sentence."<br> <br>January 8 this year, Fan Siu Yan lawyer submitted to the Lanzhou Intermediate People's Court on the petition. He believes that an accurate judgment decisive, but the fact that part of the "Fan Siu Yan on what grounds can not constitute a reason to throw the child and requires a lighter punishment, its behavior contrary to social ethics, the law should be the case in the situation unpardonable" make a determination, and the facts are not entirely consistent - First of all, say the court finds that the "kill children" and does not reflect the case of the whole picture, Fan Siu Yan recognize such behavior indeed greatly violate social ethics, should be punished, but his son Xiao Ming is his best love,http://store.shopping.yahoo.co.jp/imanando/sweat-checker.html, can also do not want to raise their mother, they are in the case of loss of life of courage, a passive,http://periscopewebvideo.com/user/107264/fbconnect, but to make choices and his son die. This is a general intentional homicide, in the subjective vicious, harmful consequences there is a big difference, so the sentencing should also be different.<br> <br>Fan Siu Yan also think that they are also victims. Now,http://www.saigakukan.co.jp, he will bear a heavy psychological burden for life,tiffany gioielli, unable to face their loved ones can not face their own, this invisible punishment even beyond the penalty is life imprisonment. And for their families and loved ones for their own jail undoubtedly an already injured family once again a heavy blow. Fan Siu Yan's lawyer insisted the defense point of view when the first instance, there is no evidence for that case death results Xiaoming again raised objections: such a major fact, the Court alone "incident when the weather is cold, young and no swimming skills, Xiao Ming was thrown into the Yellow River in the heart of "inferred" Xiao Ming could no longer alive, "Fan Siu Yan accordingly finds intentional homicide Accomplished, ignoring the small matter of death has not yet risen to clear legal fact,air max pas cher,http://androg.seesaa.net, this reasoning is defective.<br><br>
DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca
and the facts are not entirely consistent - First of all
(1 post)-
Posted 10 years ago #
Reply
You must log in to post.