DavidCadogan.ca Forums » DavidCadogan.ca

scarpe hogan investment institutions

(1 post)
  • Started 10 years ago by 6xirnsngm3

  1. 6xirnsngm3
    Member

    <p> "dual track" is unreasonable. However, this does not mean that the "dual track" Bounce is progress. Endowment is wrong with a wrong thing to rectify another wrong thing,zanotti 2015, does not mean that is correct. Endowment is a bottomless pit, swallow social wealth and reduce economic competitiveness, people involved in the social pension of the more damaging effects of such enormous. Leaving aside the "social justice" Do not say,air max bw pas cher, and universal social pension compared to the "dual track" for the destruction of the economy and society is actually greatly reduced. The only correct approach is to remove the government-led,moncler italia, mandatory participation in the social insurance system. But it is not easy to do. Therefore the "dual track" Bounce will eventually become the inevitable choice. Mankind on the path of social pension, must not hit the brick wall does not look back, even if not beaten but hit a brick wall does not look back. China because of the large population.</p>

    <p> This is for those who pay the insurance benefits the insured person is not plunder? 5 Q: What is a good pension choice? A person exactly how much of their income in part to save up for retirement purposes is reasonable, it all depends on the person's living conditions and values. For all, set a minimum percentage of participation in the social pension system, and for them to set the minimum proportion of spending on lodging or transportation,moncler donna, are extremely unreasonable. Individuals how to spend their own resources, have the final say. The ideal is to abolish government-led compulsory social insurance, pension savings instead, raising children for old age, and based on investment banking, commercial insurance,Giuseppe Zanotti Paris, comprehensive insurance system market. Commercial insurance, investment institutions are not the same, it can be passed to sons and grandsons of the shares of enterprises,nike tn, they can also sell in the market. But to become chairman of the board of commercial insurance, investment institutions,moncler piumini, you have to inject in the enterprise, betting, to catch his life. Government-led pension fund compulsory participation is clearly not the case,hollister femme, their behavior will be fundamentally different. Do not socialized, but it should rely on market-based investment banking and commercial insurance to provide. Six Questions: "dual track" Bounce is progress? China has implemented the urban and rural social endowment "dual track." From the sense of social justice.</p>

    <p> what is the cost of benefits. Also clear what practical constraints faced. Ideal is good, but the reality is often cruel.</p>

    <p> the road is not a bad number more slowly. Engage in social pension, pension account deficit appear sooner or later,barbour pas cher, you can use the sale of state assets to cover pension account,woolrich milano, you can also increase tax revenue by fiscal transfers to cover pension account,air max mujer, you can also send money to cover pension accounts, but which ultimately can not to maintain, to the last time delay pensioners will become the inevitable choice. Cause further delay,Giuseppe Zanotti, to finally give up the social pension will choose it? Will,barbour femme, economic laws are hard constraints, the benefits outweigh the cost of things can not go on forever. Seven Q: What can the government do? Not completely exclude the government. The Government only provides guaranteed minimum living standard, which is social assistance, not social insurance. Fee collection should be called social insurance,air jordan 4 retro rouge noir, but should explicitly be called social assistance payments. Of course,louboutin pas cher, providing this assistance is not only the government. Various charitable organizations in this regard is also promising. To this end, the Government should encourage the building of various social organizations. From the humanitarian point of view, we want everyone to live a decent life in old age. If a decent living standard, how to solve a huge moral hazard problem? A person would have the ability to work, but because of social insurance,abercrombie paris, he does not work or reduce the level of effort, he really needs to identify how social insurance or social insurance take a ride in it? A few years ago Mr. Mao Yushi appeal not to build low-cost housing private toilet,soldes louboutin, built only public toilets,barbour femme, not for people to understand. We do not understand this is not a do not care about the poor, the poor do not want a good life, but low-cost housing built well, and it may fall to help people not really need the hands. Endowment versa, people who really need help are not privileged pensions. Who does not like welfare? But the problem is that welfare must clearly come from.</p>

    相关的主题文章：

    Posted 10 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.